{"title":"Abstract 196: Redefining cancer subtypes using multi-omics and deep learning","authors":"A. Akalin, B. Uyar, J. Ronen, V. Franke","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.AM2021-196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cancer is a heterogeneous collection of diseases traditionally classified by the tissue of origin. The diversity of the molecular profiles of cancers has a big impact on the way patients are diagnosed and treated, how they respond to their prescribed treatments, the duration of survival after diagnosis, and factors such as remission, recurrence, or spread (metastasis) of the disease. While such diagnostic and prognostic outcomes are potentially predictable by taking a closer look into the changes of the genome, epigenome, transcriptome, proteome, and various other omics platforms, the contemporary cancer treatments still predominantly don9t make the best use of such multi-omics profiling of patient samples. Therefore, multi-omics profiling of cancers holds great potential to define a molecularly coherent subtype definition of cancers in order to achieve the eventual goal of matching the best possible treatment to the subgroup of patients. However, the current subtypes from consortiums such as TCGA have been defined by heterogeneous methods and molecular markers by different teams. A subset of these studies have not attempted to characterize molecular subtypes, but rather taken histopathologically defined subtypes as the gold standard and tried to characterize molecular features of these subtypes. Here we evaluate TCGA cancer subtypes based on the molecular profile coherence score. This novel metric combines survival statistics, pathways information, tumor purity estimates, and mutational signatures. We expect that subtypes that are patient subgroups should display molecular signature homogeneity. We evaluate TCGA subtypes from 21 cancers using these criteria and compare the subtypes with our own definition using multi-omics data in a deep learning framework. We have refined the several subtypes from multiple cancers towards more molecularly coherent patient subgroups. Citation Format: Altuna Akalin, Bora Uyar, Jonathan Ronen, Vedran Franke. Redefining cancer subtypes using multi-omics and deep learning [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 196.","PeriodicalId":73617,"journal":{"name":"Journal of bioinformatics and systems biology : Open access","volume":"284 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of bioinformatics and systems biology : Open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.AM2021-196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cancer is a heterogeneous collection of diseases traditionally classified by the tissue of origin. The diversity of the molecular profiles of cancers has a big impact on the way patients are diagnosed and treated, how they respond to their prescribed treatments, the duration of survival after diagnosis, and factors such as remission, recurrence, or spread (metastasis) of the disease. While such diagnostic and prognostic outcomes are potentially predictable by taking a closer look into the changes of the genome, epigenome, transcriptome, proteome, and various other omics platforms, the contemporary cancer treatments still predominantly don9t make the best use of such multi-omics profiling of patient samples. Therefore, multi-omics profiling of cancers holds great potential to define a molecularly coherent subtype definition of cancers in order to achieve the eventual goal of matching the best possible treatment to the subgroup of patients. However, the current subtypes from consortiums such as TCGA have been defined by heterogeneous methods and molecular markers by different teams. A subset of these studies have not attempted to characterize molecular subtypes, but rather taken histopathologically defined subtypes as the gold standard and tried to characterize molecular features of these subtypes. Here we evaluate TCGA cancer subtypes based on the molecular profile coherence score. This novel metric combines survival statistics, pathways information, tumor purity estimates, and mutational signatures. We expect that subtypes that are patient subgroups should display molecular signature homogeneity. We evaluate TCGA subtypes from 21 cancers using these criteria and compare the subtypes with our own definition using multi-omics data in a deep learning framework. We have refined the several subtypes from multiple cancers towards more molecularly coherent patient subgroups. Citation Format: Altuna Akalin, Bora Uyar, Jonathan Ronen, Vedran Franke. Redefining cancer subtypes using multi-omics and deep learning [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 196.
癌症是一种异质性的疾病集合,传统上按起源组织分类。癌症分子谱的多样性对患者的诊断和治疗方式、他们对处方治疗的反应、诊断后的生存时间以及疾病的缓解、复发或扩散(转移)等因素有很大影响。虽然通过对基因组、表观基因组、转录组、蛋白质组和各种其他组学平台的变化进行更仔细的观察,可以预测这些诊断和预后结果,但当代癌症治疗仍然主要没有充分利用这些患者样本的多组学分析。因此,癌症的多组学分析具有巨大的潜力,可以定义癌症的分子一致亚型定义,从而实现将最佳治疗方法与患者亚组相匹配的最终目标。然而,目前来自TCGA等联盟的亚型是由不同的团队通过异质方法和分子标记来定义的。这些研究的一个子集没有试图表征分子亚型,而是将组织病理学定义的亚型作为金标准,并试图表征这些亚型的分子特征。在这里,我们基于分子谱一致性评分来评估TCGA癌症亚型。这种新的度量结合了生存统计、途径信息、肿瘤纯度估计和突变特征。我们期望作为患者亚组的亚型应该表现出分子特征的同质性。我们使用这些标准评估了21种癌症的TCGA亚型,并在深度学习框架中使用多组学数据将亚型与我们自己的定义进行了比较。我们已经从多种癌症中提炼了几种亚型,使其趋向于分子上更一致的患者亚群。引文格式:Altuna Akalin, Bora Uyar, Jonathan Ronen, Vedran Franke。利用多组学和深度学习重新定义癌症亚型[摘要]。见:美国癌症研究协会2021年年会论文集;2021年4月10日至15日和5月17日至21日。费城(PA): AACR;癌症杂志,2021;81(13 -增刊):摘要第196期。