Comparison of two scoring method within i-vector framework for speaker recognition from children's speech

Saeid Safavi, L. Meng
{"title":"Comparison of two scoring method within i-vector framework for speaker recognition from children's speech","authors":"Saeid Safavi, L. Meng","doi":"10.21437/WOCCI.2017-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Speaker recognition is a well established area for research but it mainly focuses on adult speech. Recent work on children’s speech shows that not all the findings from speaker recognition on adult speech are directly applicable on children’s speech. There are a variety of applications for speaker recognition from children’s speech, for example it could be used as a safeguard for a child during her/his interactions on social media network-ing websites. It could also be used as one of the main blocks in automatic tutor systems for educational purposes at schools. In this research we have evaluated two scoring method for speaker recognition within the i-vector framework using two simulated environments; in a classroom (contains 30 students) and in a school (contains 288 students). The first method is based on the PLDA scoring approach and the second method is based on the cosine similarity measure. Results show that the first method outperforms the second approach in a simulated school, but it is the other way around for the recognition of a child in a classroom in which the second scoring method performs better. focused on both speaker identification and verification for text-independent mode of operation.","PeriodicalId":91973,"journal":{"name":"The ... Workshop on Child, Computer and Interaction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The ... Workshop on Child, Computer and Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21437/WOCCI.2017-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Speaker recognition is a well established area for research but it mainly focuses on adult speech. Recent work on children’s speech shows that not all the findings from speaker recognition on adult speech are directly applicable on children’s speech. There are a variety of applications for speaker recognition from children’s speech, for example it could be used as a safeguard for a child during her/his interactions on social media network-ing websites. It could also be used as one of the main blocks in automatic tutor systems for educational purposes at schools. In this research we have evaluated two scoring method for speaker recognition within the i-vector framework using two simulated environments; in a classroom (contains 30 students) and in a school (contains 288 students). The first method is based on the PLDA scoring approach and the second method is based on the cosine similarity measure. Results show that the first method outperforms the second approach in a simulated school, but it is the other way around for the recognition of a child in a classroom in which the second scoring method performs better. focused on both speaker identification and verification for text-independent mode of operation.
i-vector框架下两种评分方法在儿童说话人识别中的比较
说话人识别是一个成熟的研究领域,但主要集中在成人言语上。最近关于儿童言语的研究表明,并非所有关于成人言语的说话人识别结果都能直接适用于儿童言语。从儿童的言语中识别说话人有多种应用,例如,它可以作为儿童在社交媒体网站上互动时的保护措施。它也可以用作学校教育目的的自动辅导系统的主要模块之一。在本研究中,我们使用两个模拟环境,在i-vector框架内评估了两种说话人识别的评分方法;在一个教室(有30名学生)和一个学校(有288名学生)。第一种方法是基于PLDA评分方法,第二种方法是基于余弦相似度度量。结果表明,第一种方法在模拟学校中的表现优于第二种方法,但在第二种评分方法表现更好的教室中,对孩子的识别则相反。专注于独立文本操作模式的说话人识别和验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信