Can Universities Help to Satisfy Accounting Practitioners’ Responses of Accounting Academics’ to Accounting Practitioners’ Perceptions of Weaknesses and Strengths of Accounting Graduates in Hong Kong

IF 0.1 4区 管理学 Q4 BUSINESS
Theodore T. Y. Chen
{"title":"Can Universities Help to Satisfy Accounting Practitioners’ Responses of Accounting Academics’ to Accounting Practitioners’ Perceptions of Weaknesses and Strengths of Accounting Graduates in Hong Kong","authors":"Theodore T. Y. Chen","doi":"10.21859/bfup-09012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The waves of modernism which led to minimal liberal stein the first wave, democratic welfare state in the second and post modernismsince 1990s in the third resulted in servant government, reinforcement of civil society and neoliberalism which were followed by global economy and concept of good governance. These changes led to a new approach to administrative law. Due to crisis in modernism and welfare state in 1970, a new approach called “Fundamentalism” or “Yellow Light” Approach was defined as the main objective of administrative law which was the sum of state-centric approach (i.e. red light approach) and citizen-centric approach (i.e. green light or instrumentalist approach). It identified a new concept called “Administrative Justice” which led to fields of administrative control on one hand and efficiency and effectiveness of administrative system as well as attention to its requirements on the other. Citizens and their demands are the priority in this system. It lend to a trend in which the whole administrative system was under constant surveillance to become an accessible, fair and efficient through measures such as devising methods for possible civilian complaints against administrative decisions. The present study aims to examine this modern concept and characteristics of a proper administrative system as well as the association among general principles of administrative law, administrative decisions, good governance and judicial supervision.","PeriodicalId":43721,"journal":{"name":"Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung Und Praxis","volume":"742 1","pages":"13-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung Und Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21859/bfup-09012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The waves of modernism which led to minimal liberal stein the first wave, democratic welfare state in the second and post modernismsince 1990s in the third resulted in servant government, reinforcement of civil society and neoliberalism which were followed by global economy and concept of good governance. These changes led to a new approach to administrative law. Due to crisis in modernism and welfare state in 1970, a new approach called “Fundamentalism” or “Yellow Light” Approach was defined as the main objective of administrative law which was the sum of state-centric approach (i.e. red light approach) and citizen-centric approach (i.e. green light or instrumentalist approach). It identified a new concept called “Administrative Justice” which led to fields of administrative control on one hand and efficiency and effectiveness of administrative system as well as attention to its requirements on the other. Citizens and their demands are the priority in this system. It lend to a trend in which the whole administrative system was under constant surveillance to become an accessible, fair and efficient through measures such as devising methods for possible civilian complaints against administrative decisions. The present study aims to examine this modern concept and characteristics of a proper administrative system as well as the association among general principles of administrative law, administrative decisions, good governance and judicial supervision.
大学能否帮助会计从业人员满足会计学者对会计从业人员对香港会计毕业生优缺点的看法的回应
第一波现代主义浪潮导致了最低限度的自由主义,第二波是民主福利国家,第三波是20世纪90年代以来的后现代主义,导致了仆人政府,公民社会和新自由主义的加强,随后是全球经济和良好治理的概念。这些变化导致了行政法的新途径。由于1970年现代主义和福利国家的危机,一种被称为“原教旨主义”或“黄灯”的新方法被定义为行政法的主要目标,它是国家中心方法(即红灯方法)和公民中心方法(即绿灯或工具主义方法)的总和。它确定了一个称为“行政正义”的新概念,这一方面导致了行政控制领域,另一方面导致了行政制度的效率和效力以及对其要求的关注。在这个体系中,公民和他们的需求是优先考虑的。它促成了一种趋势,即整个行政系统在不断的监督下,通过诸如制定可能对行政决定提出民事申诉的方法等措施,使其变得易于使用、公平和有效。本研究旨在审查适当行政制度的这一现代概念和特征,以及行政法一般原则、行政决定、善治和司法监督之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信