PENGARUH METODE PEMBELAJARAN COOPERATIVE TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR INSTALASI BANGUNAN SEDERHANA KELAS X TITL SMKN 34 JAKARTA

Achmad Abi Rafdi, Farried Wadjdi, Massus Subekti
{"title":"PENGARUH METODE PEMBELAJARAN COOPERATIVE TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR INSTALASI BANGUNAN SEDERHANA KELAS X TITL SMKN 34 JAKARTA","authors":"Achmad Abi Rafdi, Farried Wadjdi, Massus Subekti","doi":"10.21009/JEVET.0032.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of cooperative learning methods and learning \nmotivation on results. Learning Simple Building Installation. The population in this study were all students of Class X TITL SMK 32, totaling 64 students. In this study using expost facto method with quantitative approach. Research data is in the form of posttest results of class X students. Data analysis techniques used normality test, namely the liliefors test with a significant level of 0.05 indicating that the data were normally distributed while the homogeneity test using the fisher test showed that the data was homogeneous. The results showed that the fcount value was greater than ftabel with a significant level of 0.05, namely 56.761 <2.5 (Method) so that the first hypothesis which states that there are differences in learning outcomes using the STAD method and the Snowball Throwing Method. The second hypothesis states that there are significant differences between learning outcomes in the upper class and those in the lower class. (Calculate> Ftable; \n9,549> 2,5). The third hypothesis states that there are differences in learning outcomes between learning methods and grade level (Fcount <Ftable; 33.02 <2.5). The results of the study conclude \nthat there are significant differences between learning methods and class levels. \nAbstrak \nTujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui Pengaruh Metode Belajar Kooperatif dan \nMotivasi Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Instalasi Bangunan Sederhana. Populasi pada penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa Kelas X TITL SMKN 32 yang berjumlah 64 orang siswa. Pada penelitian ini menggunakan metode expost facto dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Data penelitian berupa hasil posttest siswa kelas X. Teknik analisis data menggukan uji normalitas yaitu uji liliefors dengan taraf signifikan 0,05 menunjukan bahwa data berdistribusi normal sedangkan uji homogenitas menggunakan uji fisher menunjukan bahwa data bersifat homogen. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa nilai fhitung lebih besar dari ftabel dengan taraf signifikan 0,05 yaitu 56.761 < 2,5 (Metode) sehingga hipotesis pertama yang menyatakan bahwa adanya perbedaan hasil belajar menggunakan metode STAD dan Metode Snowball Throwing. Hipotesis yang kedua yang menyatakan terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan antara hasil belajar yang berada di kelas atas dengan sis yang berada di kelas bawah. (Fhitung > Ftabel; 9.549 > 2,5). Hipotesis ke tiga yang menyatakan bahwa adanya perbedaan hasil belajar antara metode pembelajaran dengan tingkat kelas (Fhitung < Ftabel; 33.02 \n< 2,5). Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa antara metode pembelajaran dengan tingkat kelas terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan.","PeriodicalId":15569,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electrical Vocational Education and Technology","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electrical Vocational Education and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21009/JEVET.0032.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of cooperative learning methods and learning motivation on results. Learning Simple Building Installation. The population in this study were all students of Class X TITL SMK 32, totaling 64 students. In this study using expost facto method with quantitative approach. Research data is in the form of posttest results of class X students. Data analysis techniques used normality test, namely the liliefors test with a significant level of 0.05 indicating that the data were normally distributed while the homogeneity test using the fisher test showed that the data was homogeneous. The results showed that the fcount value was greater than ftabel with a significant level of 0.05, namely 56.761 <2.5 (Method) so that the first hypothesis which states that there are differences in learning outcomes using the STAD method and the Snowball Throwing Method. The second hypothesis states that there are significant differences between learning outcomes in the upper class and those in the lower class. (Calculate> Ftable; 9,549> 2,5). The third hypothesis states that there are differences in learning outcomes between learning methods and grade level (Fcount Ftabel; 9.549 > 2,5). Hipotesis ke tiga yang menyatakan bahwa adanya perbedaan hasil belajar antara metode pembelajaran dengan tingkat kelas (Fhitung < Ftabel; 33.02 < 2,5). Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa antara metode pembelajaran dengan tingkat kelas terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan.
合作学习方法对在雅加达的X TITL SMKN 34年级基础设施学习结果的影响
本研究的目的是确定合作学习方法和学习动机对结果的影响。学习简单的建筑安装。本研究人群均为TITL SMK 32班学生,共64人。本研究采用实证方法结合定量方法。研究数据为X班学生的后测结果。数据分析采用正态性检验,即liliefors检验,其显著水平为0.05,表明数据正态分布;采用fisher检验,采用齐性检验,表明数据同质。结果表明,fcount值大于Ftable,显著水平为0.05,即56.761 Ftable;9549 > 5)。第三个假设认为,学习方法和年级水平在学习结果上存在差异(Fcount ftable;9.549 > 2,5)。hipoesis ke tiga yang menyatakan bahwa adanya perbedaan hasil belajar antara mede penbelajan dengan tingkat kelas (Fhitung < ftab;33.02 < 2,5)。Hasil penelitian menypulkan bahwa antara mede penbelajaran dengan tingkat kelas terdapat perbedaan yang signfikan。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信