First Successful Application of Casing in Casing CiC Refracturing Treatment in Shale Gas Well in China: Case Study

Yaowen Liu, Yuanzhao Li, Chi Zhang, Yue Ming, Jialin Xiao, Rong Han, Zichao Wang, Jiao Zhang, Changhong Wu
{"title":"First Successful Application of Casing in Casing CiC Refracturing Treatment in Shale Gas Well in China: Case Study","authors":"Yaowen Liu, Yuanzhao Li, Chi Zhang, Yue Ming, Jialin Xiao, Rong Han, Zichao Wang, Jiao Zhang, Changhong Wu","doi":"10.2118/208060-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n With active hydraulic fracturing performed since 2012, the Fuling shale gas field in China is one of the largest shale gas fields outside of North America. Recently, a Casing-in-Casing (CiC) refracturing treatment was successfully implemented, resulting in production beyond expectations. This was the first successful application of a CiC refracturing treatment in a horizontal shale gas well in this region, thus providing a new option for refracturing horizontal wells in China.\n Bullheading diversion refracturing with diverting balls was previously attempted in this field with high initial production observed; however, production was inconsistent and quickly declined. Therefore, the operator decided to attempt a CiC refracturing method in an understimulated candidate well. This involved installing and cementing 3.5-in. casing in 5.5-in. casing to effectively isolate the perforations, which enabled plugging and perforating operations in the reconstructed wellbore for an effective refracturing treatment. A customized refracturing design integrated the production profile, residual recoverable reserves, and the specific 5.5- × 3.5-in. reconstructed wellbore limitation.\n The length of the 3.5-in. casing was optimized to be as short as possible but still cover the original perforations, and high-performance slickwater was used to reduce pipe friction, thus increasing the treatment rate. An engineered breakdown approach was employed for improved fracture initiation. Additionally, more clusters were added between the original clusters and, based on production profile results, some of the original understimulated clusters with little proppant placement were reperforated. To overcome the impact of depleted fractures, a self-degradable particulate diverting agent was used to propagate new fractures, allowing access to new rock to increase total reserve recovery.\n The treatment in the reconstructed wellbore was successful, with 21 stages fractured in 12 days, achieving 100% placement of the designed proppant and fluid. A treatment rate of 7 to 12 m3/min from the toe to heel was executed as designed. Test production of 183,800 m3/D was also achieved with a recovery rate of 88.1%. Production has remained consistent and wellhead pressure has remained steady at a high level throughout the first two months of production.\n CiC refracturing technology helps overcome common disadvantages experienced with traditional refracturing techniques, such as poorly placed proppant and fluid and inconsistent production. CiC refracturing not only allows exploitation of bypassed reserves from original fractures, but also allows precise stimulation of new rock to obtain the highest reserve recovery. The successful implementation of this case study illustrates the reliability of CiC refracturing technology and provides valuable experience to be used during future regional horizontal well refracturing.","PeriodicalId":10967,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, November 15, 2021","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, November 15, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/208060-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

With active hydraulic fracturing performed since 2012, the Fuling shale gas field in China is one of the largest shale gas fields outside of North America. Recently, a Casing-in-Casing (CiC) refracturing treatment was successfully implemented, resulting in production beyond expectations. This was the first successful application of a CiC refracturing treatment in a horizontal shale gas well in this region, thus providing a new option for refracturing horizontal wells in China. Bullheading diversion refracturing with diverting balls was previously attempted in this field with high initial production observed; however, production was inconsistent and quickly declined. Therefore, the operator decided to attempt a CiC refracturing method in an understimulated candidate well. This involved installing and cementing 3.5-in. casing in 5.5-in. casing to effectively isolate the perforations, which enabled plugging and perforating operations in the reconstructed wellbore for an effective refracturing treatment. A customized refracturing design integrated the production profile, residual recoverable reserves, and the specific 5.5- × 3.5-in. reconstructed wellbore limitation. The length of the 3.5-in. casing was optimized to be as short as possible but still cover the original perforations, and high-performance slickwater was used to reduce pipe friction, thus increasing the treatment rate. An engineered breakdown approach was employed for improved fracture initiation. Additionally, more clusters were added between the original clusters and, based on production profile results, some of the original understimulated clusters with little proppant placement were reperforated. To overcome the impact of depleted fractures, a self-degradable particulate diverting agent was used to propagate new fractures, allowing access to new rock to increase total reserve recovery. The treatment in the reconstructed wellbore was successful, with 21 stages fractured in 12 days, achieving 100% placement of the designed proppant and fluid. A treatment rate of 7 to 12 m3/min from the toe to heel was executed as designed. Test production of 183,800 m3/D was also achieved with a recovery rate of 88.1%. Production has remained consistent and wellhead pressure has remained steady at a high level throughout the first two months of production. CiC refracturing technology helps overcome common disadvantages experienced with traditional refracturing techniques, such as poorly placed proppant and fluid and inconsistent production. CiC refracturing not only allows exploitation of bypassed reserves from original fractures, but also allows precise stimulation of new rock to obtain the highest reserve recovery. The successful implementation of this case study illustrates the reliability of CiC refracturing technology and provides valuable experience to be used during future regional horizontal well refracturing.
套管在页岩气井重复压裂中的首次成功应用
涪陵页岩气田自2012年以来一直在进行水力压裂作业,是北美以外最大的页岩气田之一。最近,该油田成功实施了套中套管(CiC)重复压裂处理,产量超出预期。这是该地区首次在水平井中成功应用CiC重复压裂技术,为中国水平井重复压裂提供了新的选择。此前,该油田曾尝试过利用转流球进行井顶转向重复压裂,初期产量较高;然而,产量不稳定,并迅速下降。因此,作业者决定在未充分压裂的候选井中尝试使用CiC重复压裂方法。这包括安装和固井3.5-in。5.5英寸套管。套管可以有效隔离射孔,从而可以在重建井眼中进行封堵和射孔作业,从而进行有效的重复压裂处理。定制的重复压裂设计集成了生产剖面、剩余可采储量和特定的5.5 × 3.5-in井眼。重建井筒限制。3.5英寸的长度。套管被优化得尽可能短,但仍能覆盖原来的射孔,并使用高性能滑溜水来减少管柱摩擦,从而提高了处理率。采用工程击穿方法来改善裂缝起裂。此外,在原来的簇之间增加了更多的簇,根据生产剖面结果,一些原始的未充分压裂的簇,少量的支撑剂被重新射孔。为了克服枯竭裂缝的影响,使用了一种自降解颗粒转向剂来扩展新裂缝,允许进入新岩石,以提高总储量采收率。重建井眼的处理是成功的,在12天内进行了21段压裂,实现了设计支撑剂和流体的100%充填。从脚趾到脚跟的处理率为7 ~ 12 m3/min。试验产量为18.38万m3/D,采收率为88.1%。在前两个月的生产中,产量保持稳定,井口压力保持稳定在高水平。CiC重复压裂技术有助于克服传统重复压裂技术的共同缺点,例如支撑剂和流体放置不当以及产量不一致。CiC重复压裂不仅可以从原始裂缝中开采绕过的储量,还可以对新岩石进行精确改造,以获得最高的储量采收率。该案例的成功实施说明了CiC重复压裂技术的可靠性,为今后区域水平井重复压裂提供了宝贵的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信