Re-Print-A Comparison between Conventional Throat Packs and Pharyngeal Placement of Tampons in Rhinology Surgeries.

H. Alansari
{"title":"Re-Print-A Comparison between Conventional Throat Packs and Pharyngeal Placement of Tampons in Rhinology Surgeries.","authors":"H. Alansari","doi":"10.31579/2692-9562/015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: the aim is to evaluate the incidence of postoperative throat pain, nausea and vomiting in patients that have been packed with either conventional gauze or pharyngeal tampons. Methods: We included adult patients who were booked for a rhinology surgery that needed throat packs. They were allocated into two groups, pharyngeal tampons, and conventional ribbon gauze. They were then assessed using visual analog scales and Post-operative nausea and vomiting impact scale respectively in the 1st, 4th, and 24th hour. Data was analyzed using SPSS software version 25. Results: There is evidence to suggest that using pharyngeal tampons reduces the mean VAS score at 4 hours compared to using Gauze. [t87=3.294, p=0.001), the is no statistical evidence that show a difference in the other Visual analogue scores or post-operative nausea and vomiting scores. Conclusion: The study shows that the use of pharyngeal tampons is associated with decreased pain scores, however, it also shows that there no difference in postoperative nausea and vomiting.","PeriodicalId":79680,"journal":{"name":"Lin chuang er bi yan hou ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology","volume":"34 1","pages":"01-07"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lin chuang er bi yan hou ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9562/015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: the aim is to evaluate the incidence of postoperative throat pain, nausea and vomiting in patients that have been packed with either conventional gauze or pharyngeal tampons. Methods: We included adult patients who were booked for a rhinology surgery that needed throat packs. They were allocated into two groups, pharyngeal tampons, and conventional ribbon gauze. They were then assessed using visual analog scales and Post-operative nausea and vomiting impact scale respectively in the 1st, 4th, and 24th hour. Data was analyzed using SPSS software version 25. Results: There is evidence to suggest that using pharyngeal tampons reduces the mean VAS score at 4 hours compared to using Gauze. [t87=3.294, p=0.001), the is no statistical evidence that show a difference in the other Visual analogue scores or post-operative nausea and vomiting scores. Conclusion: The study shows that the use of pharyngeal tampons is associated with decreased pain scores, however, it also shows that there no difference in postoperative nausea and vomiting.
常规咽喉填充物与卫生棉条在鼻科手术中咽部放置的比较。
目的:目的是评估患者术后喉咙痛,恶心和呕吐的发生率已被包装的传统纱布或咽卫生棉条。方法:我们纳入了预定进行鼻外科手术需要咽喉包的成年患者。他们被分为两组,咽卫生棉条组和传统的带状纱布组。分别于术后第1、4、24小时采用视觉模拟量表和术后恶心呕吐影响量表对患者进行评估。数据分析采用SPSS软件25版。结果:有证据表明,与使用纱布相比,使用咽卫生棉条可降低4小时时的平均VAS评分。[t87=3.294, p=0.001],其他视觉模拟评分或术后恶心呕吐评分无统计学差异。结论:本研究显示咽部卫生棉条的使用与疼痛评分降低有关,但也显示术后恶心和呕吐无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信