COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PVM AND MPI FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF PHYSICAL APPLICATIONS IN PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS

Q3 Computer Science
Srikanth Bethu
{"title":"COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PVM AND MPI FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF PHYSICAL APPLICATIONS IN PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS","authors":"Srikanth Bethu","doi":"10.47893/ijcns.2014.1097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is aimed to explore each of these two Parallel Virtual Machine (PVM) and Message Passing Interface(MPI) vehicles for DPP (Distributed Parallel Processing) considering capability, ease of use, and availability, and compares their distinguishing features and also explores programmer interface and their utilization for solving real world parallel processing applications. This work recommends a potential research issue, that is, to study the feasibility of creating a programming environment that allows access to the virtual machine features of PVM and the message passing features of MPI. PVM and MPI, two systems for programming clusters, are often compared. Each system has its unique strengths and this will remain so in to the foreseeable future. The comparisons usually start with the unspoken assumption that PVM and MPI represent different solutions to the same problem. In this paper we show that, in fact, the two systems often are solving different problems. In cases where the problems do match but the solutions chosen by PVM and MPI are different, we explain the reasons for the differences. Usually such differences can be traced to explicit differences in the goals of the two systems, their origins, or the relationship between their specifications and their implementations. This paper also compares PVM and MPI features, pointing out the situations where one may be favored over the other; it explains the deference’s between these systems and the reasons for such deference’s.","PeriodicalId":38851,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47893/ijcns.2014.1097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research is aimed to explore each of these two Parallel Virtual Machine (PVM) and Message Passing Interface(MPI) vehicles for DPP (Distributed Parallel Processing) considering capability, ease of use, and availability, and compares their distinguishing features and also explores programmer interface and their utilization for solving real world parallel processing applications. This work recommends a potential research issue, that is, to study the feasibility of creating a programming environment that allows access to the virtual machine features of PVM and the message passing features of MPI. PVM and MPI, two systems for programming clusters, are often compared. Each system has its unique strengths and this will remain so in to the foreseeable future. The comparisons usually start with the unspoken assumption that PVM and MPI represent different solutions to the same problem. In this paper we show that, in fact, the two systems often are solving different problems. In cases where the problems do match but the solutions chosen by PVM and MPI are different, we explain the reasons for the differences. Usually such differences can be traced to explicit differences in the goals of the two systems, their origins, or the relationship between their specifications and their implementations. This paper also compares PVM and MPI features, pointing out the situations where one may be favored over the other; it explains the deference’s between these systems and the reasons for such deference’s.
PVM和mpi在并行和分布式系统中开发物理应用的比较分析
本研究旨在探讨这两种并行虚拟机(PVM)和消息传递接口(MPI)工具在DPP(分布式并行处理)中的能力、易用性和可用性,并比较它们的区别特征,同时探索程序员接口及其在解决现实世界并行处理应用中的应用。这项工作提出了一个潜在的研究问题,即研究创建一个允许访问PVM的虚拟机特性和MPI的消息传递特性的编程环境的可行性。PVM和MPI这两种用于编程集群的系统经常被比较。每种系统都有其独特的优势,在可预见的未来仍将如此。比较通常从一个不言而喻的假设开始,即PVM和MPI代表同一问题的不同解决方案。在本文中,我们表明,事实上,这两个系统往往是解决不同的问题。如果问题确实匹配,但PVM和MPI选择的解决方案不同,我们将解释差异的原因。通常,这些差异可以追溯到两个系统的目标、它们的起源,或者它们的规范和实现之间的关系的显式差异。本文还比较了PVM和MPI的特性,指出了其中一种可能优于另一种的情况;解释了这些制度之间的差异,以及产生差异的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security
International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security (IJCNIS) is a scholarly peer reviewed international scientific journal published three times (April, August, December) in a year, focusing on theories, methods, and applications in networks and information security. It provides a challenging forum for researchers, industrial professionals, engineers, managers, and policy makers working in the field to contribute and disseminate innovative new work on networks and information security.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信