Value of preoperative computed tomography and three-dimensional reconstruction of major vascular structures before ex vivo liver resection and autotransplantation for hepatic alveolar echinococcosis

Aini Abudusalamu, Y. Shao, A. Tuerganaili, B. Ran, T. Jiang, Shalayiadang Paizula, Ruiqing Zhang, Q. Guo, Aimaiti Dilimureti
{"title":"Value of preoperative computed tomography and three-dimensional reconstruction of major vascular structures before ex vivo liver resection and autotransplantation for hepatic alveolar echinococcosis","authors":"Aini Abudusalamu, Y. Shao, A. Tuerganaili, B. Ran, T. Jiang, Shalayiadang Paizula, Ruiqing Zhang, Q. Guo, Aimaiti Dilimureti","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate the application value of preoperative computed tomography (CT) and three-dimensional reconstruction (3DR) of major vessels regarding lesion infiltration severity, vascular morphology & function and predict vascular surgeries during ex vivo liver resection and autotransplantation (ELRA) for end-stage hepatic alveolar echinococcosis (AE). \n \n \nMethods \nPreoperative radiological & angiographical, intraoperative photographic and pathological materials were retrospectively collected in 40 consecutive patients undergoing ELRA for end-stage hepatic alveolar echinococcosis from January 2017 to January 2019. Severity of lesion infiltration, morphological & functional status as well as predictive value for surgical planning of hepatic venous system (HVs), inferior vena cava (IVC), portal venous system (PVs) and hepatic arterial supply system (HAs) were estimated, then compared with those built golden standards: angiography, intraoperative diagnosis and pathological examinationss. \n \n \nResults \nEvaluation accuracy of CT and 3DR for lesion infiltration severity, vascular morphology & function and predicting vascular surgeries respectively were 68.1%, 71.9%, 78.9% and 57.5%, 89.2%, 71.1% and all paired data had statistical significance (all P<0.05). Furthermore, CT had a higher certainty of predicting the use of vascular prosthesis during surgery than 3DR (77.5% and 70.0%, P<0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nPre-ELRA CT is recommended for evaluating lesion infiltration severity and predicting corresponding vascular surgery. However, 3DR has more certainty in evaluating vascular morphology & function. Furthermore, CT is more reliable than 3DR in predicting vascular prosthesis during ELRA. However, optional better solutions should be studied for higher assurance. \n \n \nKey words: \nLiver transplantation; Echinococcosis; Three-dimensional computer-aided design","PeriodicalId":9885,"journal":{"name":"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation","volume":"329 1","pages":"205-210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.04.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the application value of preoperative computed tomography (CT) and three-dimensional reconstruction (3DR) of major vessels regarding lesion infiltration severity, vascular morphology & function and predict vascular surgeries during ex vivo liver resection and autotransplantation (ELRA) for end-stage hepatic alveolar echinococcosis (AE). Methods Preoperative radiological & angiographical, intraoperative photographic and pathological materials were retrospectively collected in 40 consecutive patients undergoing ELRA for end-stage hepatic alveolar echinococcosis from January 2017 to January 2019. Severity of lesion infiltration, morphological & functional status as well as predictive value for surgical planning of hepatic venous system (HVs), inferior vena cava (IVC), portal venous system (PVs) and hepatic arterial supply system (HAs) were estimated, then compared with those built golden standards: angiography, intraoperative diagnosis and pathological examinationss. Results Evaluation accuracy of CT and 3DR for lesion infiltration severity, vascular morphology & function and predicting vascular surgeries respectively were 68.1%, 71.9%, 78.9% and 57.5%, 89.2%, 71.1% and all paired data had statistical significance (all P<0.05). Furthermore, CT had a higher certainty of predicting the use of vascular prosthesis during surgery than 3DR (77.5% and 70.0%, P<0.05). Conclusions Pre-ELRA CT is recommended for evaluating lesion infiltration severity and predicting corresponding vascular surgery. However, 3DR has more certainty in evaluating vascular morphology & function. Furthermore, CT is more reliable than 3DR in predicting vascular prosthesis during ELRA. However, optional better solutions should be studied for higher assurance. Key words: Liver transplantation; Echinococcosis; Three-dimensional computer-aided design
肝泡包虫病离体肝切除自体移植术前计算机断层扫描及主要血管结构三维重建的价值
目的评价终末期肝肺泡包虫病(AE)术前CT及主要血管三维重建(3DR)对病变浸润程度、血管形态及功能的应用价值,预测终末期肝肺泡包虫病(AE)离体肝切除与自体移植(ELRA)中血管手术。方法回顾性收集2017年1月至2019年1月连续40例终末期肝泡包虫病行ELRA治疗的患者术前影像学、血管造影、术中摄影及病理资料。评估肝静脉系统(HVs)、下腔静脉(IVC)、门静脉系统(pv)、肝动脉供应系统(HAs)病变浸润程度、形态功能状况及对手术计划的预测价值,并与已建立的金标准:血管造影、术中诊断、病理检查进行比较。结果CT和3DR对病变浸润严重程度、血管形态功能、预测血管手术的准确率分别为68.1%、71.9%、78.9%和57.5%、89.2%、71.1%,配对数据均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。CT预测术中血管假体使用的确定性高于3DR(77.5%和70.0%,P<0.05)。结论推荐采用Pre-ELRA CT评估病变浸润严重程度,预测相应的血管手术。而3DR在评价血管形态和功能方面更有确定性。此外,CT对ELRA中血管假体的预测比3DR更可靠。但是,应该研究可选的更好的解决方案,以获得更高的保证。关键词:肝移植;包虫病;三维计算机辅助设计
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信