An occupational exposure assessment of a perfluorooctanesulfonyl fluoride production site: biomonitoring.

G. Olsen, P. Logan, K. Hansen, C. A. Simpson, J. Burris, M. Burlew, Phanasouk P Vorarath, P. Venkateswarlu, J. C. Schumpert, J. Mandel
{"title":"An occupational exposure assessment of a perfluorooctanesulfonyl fluoride production site: biomonitoring.","authors":"G. Olsen, P. Logan, K. Hansen, C. A. Simpson, J. Burris, M. Burlew, Phanasouk P Vorarath, P. Venkateswarlu, J. C. Schumpert, J. Mandel","doi":"10.1080/15428110308984859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This investigation randomly sampled a fluorochemical manufacturing employee population to determine the distribution of serum fluorochemical levels according to employees' jobs and work areas. Previous analyses of medical surveillance data have not shown significant associations between fluorochemical production employees' clinical chemistry and hematology tests and their serum PFOS and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA, C(7)F(15)COO(-)) concentrations, but may have been subject to nonparticipation bias. A random sample of the on-site film plant employee population, where fluorochemicals are not produced, determined their serum concentrations also. Of the 232 employees randomly selected for serum sampling, 186 (80%) employees participated (n=126 chemical plant; n=60 film plant). Sera samples were extracted using an ion-pairing extraction procedure and were quantitatively analyzed for seven fluorochemicals using high-pressure liquid chromatography electrospray tandem mass spectrometry methods. Geometric means (in parts per million) and 95% confidence intervals (in parentheses) of the random sample of 126 chemical plant employees were: PFOS 0.941 (0.787-1.126); PFOA 0.899 (0.722-1.120); perfluorohexanesulfonate 0.180 (0.145-0.223); N-ethyl perfluorooctanesulfonamidoacetate 0.008 (0.006-0.011); N-methyl perfluorooctanesulfonamidoacetate 0.081 (0.067-0.098); perfluorooctanesulfonamide 0.013 (0.009-0.018); and perfluorooctanesulfonamidoacetate 0.022 (0.018-0.029). These geometric means were approximately one order of magnitude higher than those observed for the film plant employees.","PeriodicalId":83618,"journal":{"name":"AIHA journal : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety","volume":"260 1","pages":"651-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"102","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIHA journal : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15428110308984859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 102

Abstract

This investigation randomly sampled a fluorochemical manufacturing employee population to determine the distribution of serum fluorochemical levels according to employees' jobs and work areas. Previous analyses of medical surveillance data have not shown significant associations between fluorochemical production employees' clinical chemistry and hematology tests and their serum PFOS and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA, C(7)F(15)COO(-)) concentrations, but may have been subject to nonparticipation bias. A random sample of the on-site film plant employee population, where fluorochemicals are not produced, determined their serum concentrations also. Of the 232 employees randomly selected for serum sampling, 186 (80%) employees participated (n=126 chemical plant; n=60 film plant). Sera samples were extracted using an ion-pairing extraction procedure and were quantitatively analyzed for seven fluorochemicals using high-pressure liquid chromatography electrospray tandem mass spectrometry methods. Geometric means (in parts per million) and 95% confidence intervals (in parentheses) of the random sample of 126 chemical plant employees were: PFOS 0.941 (0.787-1.126); PFOA 0.899 (0.722-1.120); perfluorohexanesulfonate 0.180 (0.145-0.223); N-ethyl perfluorooctanesulfonamidoacetate 0.008 (0.006-0.011); N-methyl perfluorooctanesulfonamidoacetate 0.081 (0.067-0.098); perfluorooctanesulfonamide 0.013 (0.009-0.018); and perfluorooctanesulfonamidoacetate 0.022 (0.018-0.029). These geometric means were approximately one order of magnitude higher than those observed for the film plant employees.
全氟辛烷磺酰氟生产场所的职业接触评估:生物监测。
本调查随机抽样了一组氟化工制造业员工,根据员工的工作岗位和工作区域确定血清氟化学水平的分布。先前对医疗监测数据的分析并未显示氟化工生产员工的临床化学和血液学测试与其血清全氟辛烷磺酸和全氟辛酸(PFOA, C(7)F(15)COO(-))浓度之间存在显著关联,但可能存在非参与偏倚。对不生产氟化学品的现场薄膜厂员工进行随机抽样,也测定了他们的血清浓度。在随机抽取的232名员工中,186名(80%)员工参与了血清采样(n=126家化工厂;N =60膜厂)。采用离子配对萃取法提取血清样品,并采用高压液相色谱-电喷雾串联质谱法对7种含氟化学物质进行定量分析。126名化工厂员工随机抽样的几何平均值(以百万分之一计)和95%置信区间(括号内)为:PFOS 0.941 (0.787-1.126);Pfoa 0.899 (0.722-1.120);全氟己磺酸盐0.180 (0.145-0.223);n -乙基全氟辛烷磺酰胺乙酸酯0.008 (0.006-0.011);n -全氟辛烷磺酰胺乙酸甲酯0.081 (0.067-0.098);全氟辛烷磺酰胺0.013 (0.009-0.018);全氟辛烷磺酰胺醋酸酯0.022(0.018-0.029)。这些几何平均值大约比在电影工厂员工中观察到的高出一个数量级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信