Global health, human rights, and neoliberalism: The need for structural frameworks when addressing mental health disparities.

IF 1 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Farahdeba Herrawi, J. Logan, Chia-Po Cheng, Lisa Cosgrove
{"title":"Global health, human rights, and neoliberalism: The need for structural frameworks when addressing mental health disparities.","authors":"Farahdeba Herrawi, J. Logan, Chia-Po Cheng, Lisa Cosgrove","doi":"10.1037/teo0000192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we argue that the field of psychology-and the psy-disciplines generally-need to embrace an interdisciplinary approach if they are to be relevant and contribute to global social justice initiatives. We focus on two such initiatives: The Global Mental Health movement and calls for increasing access to mental health services for immigrants. We suggest that a stronger focus on the upstream causes of ill-health, a deeper appreciation for the ways in which neoliberalism deflects attention away from these upstream determinants, and a greater engagement with the field of human rights and other disciplines will lead to more substantive gains in population mental health. Public Significance Statement This paper discusses the ways in which neoliberal ideology advances the medicalization of distress, by emphasizing individual responsibility. For immigrants, refugees, and asylum-seekers, increasing the provision of psychological services and/or psychotropic drugs in response to structural violence is an insufficient response by the psy-disciplines. Committing to an interdisciplinary and human rights approach to Global Mental Health and to immigrant and refugee health issues will allow us to advance psychology's social justice initiatives.","PeriodicalId":17332,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this paper we argue that the field of psychology-and the psy-disciplines generally-need to embrace an interdisciplinary approach if they are to be relevant and contribute to global social justice initiatives. We focus on two such initiatives: The Global Mental Health movement and calls for increasing access to mental health services for immigrants. We suggest that a stronger focus on the upstream causes of ill-health, a deeper appreciation for the ways in which neoliberalism deflects attention away from these upstream determinants, and a greater engagement with the field of human rights and other disciplines will lead to more substantive gains in population mental health. Public Significance Statement This paper discusses the ways in which neoliberal ideology advances the medicalization of distress, by emphasizing individual responsibility. For immigrants, refugees, and asylum-seekers, increasing the provision of psychological services and/or psychotropic drugs in response to structural violence is an insufficient response by the psy-disciplines. Committing to an interdisciplinary and human rights approach to Global Mental Health and to immigrant and refugee health issues will allow us to advance psychology's social justice initiatives.
全球健康、人权和新自由主义:解决心理健康差异时需要结构框架。
在本文中,我们认为心理学领域——以及心理学科——如果要与全球社会正义倡议相关并做出贡献,就需要采用跨学科的方法。我们重点关注两项此类举措:全球精神卫生运动和呼吁增加移民获得精神卫生服务的机会。我们建议,更加关注健康不良的上游原因,更深入地了解新自由主义将注意力从这些上游决定因素上转移的方式,并更多地参与人权领域和其他学科,将在人口心理健康方面取得更实质性的成果。本文讨论了新自由主义意识形态如何通过强调个人责任来推进痛苦的医疗化。对于移民、难民和寻求庇护者来说,增加心理服务和/或精神药物的提供以应对结构性暴力是心理学科的不足之处。致力于对全球心理健康以及移民和难民健康问题采取跨学科和人权的做法,将使我们能够推进心理学的社会正义倡议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信