Trust and Participation in Online Usenet Self-Help Communities

自我保健 Pub Date : 2006-01-01 DOI:10.2190/SH.5.1.F
S. Ryan
{"title":"Trust and Participation in Online Usenet Self-Help Communities","authors":"S. Ryan","doi":"10.2190/SH.5.1.F","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vulnerability and self-disclosure make trust formation a key factor in the self-help process. However, the characteristics of online interaction challenge the development of trust. This article describes a study that explored trust and participation in two online self-help communities, one un-moderated and the other moderated. Members of the un-moderated community shared a chronic physical condition and the moderated community members had a chronic psychiatric disability. The research employed observation, analysis of online discussions, e-mail interviews, and comparisons of quantitative participation parameters. The primary difference between the two communities was the moderation process, which prevented any communication from disruptive individuals. The un-moderated community challenged disruptive or suspicious individuals, which often resulted in hostile discussions. The moderated community posted guidelines for participation and encouraged social communication, which facilitated the accumulation of history-based trust. The moderated community exhibited more participation during the","PeriodicalId":64356,"journal":{"name":"自我保健","volume":"260 1","pages":"43-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"自我保健","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2190/SH.5.1.F","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Vulnerability and self-disclosure make trust formation a key factor in the self-help process. However, the characteristics of online interaction challenge the development of trust. This article describes a study that explored trust and participation in two online self-help communities, one un-moderated and the other moderated. Members of the un-moderated community shared a chronic physical condition and the moderated community members had a chronic psychiatric disability. The research employed observation, analysis of online discussions, e-mail interviews, and comparisons of quantitative participation parameters. The primary difference between the two communities was the moderation process, which prevented any communication from disruptive individuals. The un-moderated community challenged disruptive or suspicious individuals, which often resulted in hostile discussions. The moderated community posted guidelines for participation and encouraged social communication, which facilitated the accumulation of history-based trust. The moderated community exhibited more participation during the
在线用户自助社区的信任与参与
脆弱性和自我表露使信任的形成成为自助过程中的关键因素。然而,网络互动的特点对信任的发展提出了挑战。本文描述了一项研究,探讨了两个在线自助社区的信任和参与,一个是无节制的,另一个是有节制的。非缓和社区成员共有慢性身体状况,而缓和社区成员有慢性精神残疾。本研究采用观察、在线讨论分析、电子邮件访谈、定量参与参数比较等方法。两个社区之间的主要区别在于节制过程,它阻止了破坏性个人的任何交流。不受约束的社区挑战破坏性或可疑的个人,这往往导致敌对的讨论。主持的社区发布了参与指南,并鼓励社会交流,这促进了基于历史的信任的积累。适度社区在活动期间表现出更多的参与
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20554
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书