Views from Australian osteopaths and industry stakeholders about the profession: A qualitative study

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
C. Mastronardo, L. Muddle, A. Fazalbhoy
{"title":"Views from Australian osteopaths and industry stakeholders about the profession: A qualitative study","authors":"C. Mastronardo,&nbsp;L. Muddle,&nbsp;A. Fazalbhoy","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The future health and longevity of the osteopathy<span> profession relies heavily on its practitioners and industry stakeholders to support it. Possessing a deeper understanding of practitioner and stakeholder views of the profession may provide crucial insights into the wellbeing of the workforce and their perceived skills and expertise in the wider healthcare landscape.</span></p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To provide a review of current and emerging attitudes, beliefs and behaviours of Australian osteopaths and supportive external stakeholders towards the profession.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A qualitative approach using grounded theory explored the attitudes, beliefs and behaviours of Australian osteopaths and supportive external stakeholders. Purposive sampling identified 18 practitioners (Victoria 10, Western Australia 5, and New South Wales 3) and 6 external stakeholders. All participated in semi-structured focus groups. A constant comparative method followed data collection whereby repeated ideas formed the extraction of the emerging themes presented.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Central themes for each group included: 1) practitioner wellbeing and 2) osteopathic skills and expertise. Subthemes included: 1) career sustainability and longevity for practitioners, and 2) osteopathy within the broader context of allied healthcare in Australia.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Threats to practitioner wellbeing included lack of early career support, limited career pathways, and uncertainty surrounding the future of the profession. External stakeholders echoed similar concerns regarding the future of the profession, acknowledging whilst osteopathy may play a sustainable role in managing the health and wellbeing of Australians, their skills and expertise are not unique nor exclusive to the profession, are under-evidenced, and undervalued by other healthcare professionals. Fostering a healthy and fulfilled workforce lies in securing a sustainable role for the profession by addressing these limitations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 100676"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746068923000202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The future health and longevity of the osteopathy profession relies heavily on its practitioners and industry stakeholders to support it. Possessing a deeper understanding of practitioner and stakeholder views of the profession may provide crucial insights into the wellbeing of the workforce and their perceived skills and expertise in the wider healthcare landscape.

Objective

To provide a review of current and emerging attitudes, beliefs and behaviours of Australian osteopaths and supportive external stakeholders towards the profession.

Methods

A qualitative approach using grounded theory explored the attitudes, beliefs and behaviours of Australian osteopaths and supportive external stakeholders. Purposive sampling identified 18 practitioners (Victoria 10, Western Australia 5, and New South Wales 3) and 6 external stakeholders. All participated in semi-structured focus groups. A constant comparative method followed data collection whereby repeated ideas formed the extraction of the emerging themes presented.

Results

Central themes for each group included: 1) practitioner wellbeing and 2) osteopathic skills and expertise. Subthemes included: 1) career sustainability and longevity for practitioners, and 2) osteopathy within the broader context of allied healthcare in Australia.

Conclusion

Threats to practitioner wellbeing included lack of early career support, limited career pathways, and uncertainty surrounding the future of the profession. External stakeholders echoed similar concerns regarding the future of the profession, acknowledging whilst osteopathy may play a sustainable role in managing the health and wellbeing of Australians, their skills and expertise are not unique nor exclusive to the profession, are under-evidenced, and undervalued by other healthcare professionals. Fostering a healthy and fulfilled workforce lies in securing a sustainable role for the profession by addressing these limitations.

来自澳大利亚整骨治疗师和行业利益相关者对该职业的看法:一项定性研究
骨科专业的未来健康和长寿在很大程度上依赖于其从业人员和行业利益相关者的支持。对从业者和利益相关者对专业的看法有更深入的了解,可以为更广泛的医疗保健领域的劳动力福利及其感知技能和专业知识提供重要见解。目的回顾当前和新兴的态度,信念和行为的澳大利亚整骨治疗师和支持外部利益相关者对职业。方法采用扎根理论的定性方法探讨了澳大利亚整骨治疗师和支持性外部利益相关者的态度、信念和行为。有目的抽样确定了18名从业人员(维多利亚州10名,西澳大利亚州5名,新南威尔士州3名)和6名外部利益相关者。所有人都参加了半结构化的焦点小组。在数据收集之后,经常采用比较方法,通过重复的想法形成对所提出的新主题的提取。结果各组的中心主题包括:1)从业者健康和2)整骨疗法技能和专业知识。副主题包括:1)从业人员的职业可持续性和寿命,以及2)在澳大利亚联合医疗保健的更广泛背景下的整骨疗法。结论:对从业人员健康的威胁包括缺乏早期职业支持、有限的职业路径和职业未来的不确定性。外部利益相关者对该行业的未来也表达了类似的担忧,他们承认,虽然整骨疗法可能在管理澳大利亚人的健康和福祉方面发挥着可持续的作用,但他们的技能和专业知识并不是该行业独有的,也不是排他性的,没有得到充分证明,被其他医疗保健专业人员低估了。培养一支健康和充实的劳动力队伍取决于通过解决这些限制,确保该专业发挥可持续的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.80%
发文量
42
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine is a peer-reviewed journal that provides for the publication of high quality research articles and review papers that are as broad as the many disciplines that influence and underpin the principles and practice of osteopathic medicine. Particular emphasis is given to basic science research, clinical epidemiology and health social science in relation to osteopathy and neuromusculoskeletal medicine. The Editorial Board encourages submission of articles based on both quantitative and qualitative research designs. The Editorial Board also aims to provide a forum for discourse and debate on any aspect of osteopathy and neuromusculoskeletal medicine with the aim of critically evaluating existing practices in regard to the diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with neuromusculoskeletal disorders and somatic dysfunction. All manuscripts submitted to the IJOM are subject to a blinded review process. The categories currently available for publication include reports of original research, review papers, commentaries and articles related to clinical practice, including case reports. Further details can be found in the IJOM Instructions for Authors. Manuscripts are accepted for publication with the understanding that no substantial part has been, or will be published elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信