Application of Geographically Weighted Regression to Model the Effect of Completion Parameters on Oil Production – Case Study on Unconventional Wells

M. Wigwe, M. Watson, A. Giussani, E. Nasir, S. Dambani
{"title":"Application of Geographically Weighted Regression to Model the Effect of Completion Parameters on Oil Production – Case Study on Unconventional Wells","authors":"M. Wigwe, M. Watson, A. Giussani, E. Nasir, S. Dambani","doi":"10.2118/198847-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Spatial data exists practically everywhere, including the oil and gas industry. Several factors drive the distribution of the location of oil and gas wells: performance of existing wells, available acreage, need for operators to maintain a certain amount of production and to stay competitive. Some of the important parameters to consider in the design of a completion job for an unconventional oil and gas well are the length of lateral (and by extension perforated interval), number of stages, total pounds of proppants, total volume of fluid pumped, injection pressure and injection rate.\n In big data analytics and building of a regression model to capture the effects of these parameters on oil production, the practice has been to analyze wells in similar formations or similar basins, even when these wells are miles apart. Due to the presence of spatial autocorrelation and non-stationarity in such data, the recommended practice should be to take these spatial dependencies into account by using geographically weighted regression (GWR).\n In this paper, we present an application of GWR in location-based regression modeling to capture the effect of these completion parameters on the first six months of oil production in 5700 wells in the Bakken and Three Forks formation in North Dakota. GWR builds different models for every location, leading to a spatial distribution of variable coefficients. This model is well suited to capture both local and global variations in our dependent variable. We also compare the results obtained with that of three other models: multiple regression model, artificial neural network model and universal kriging. Just like the use of kriging, GWR model resulted in a much-improved prediction of oil production as captured by the goodness-of-fit diagnostics (R squared, AIC, and RMSPE), compared to the other two non-location-based models. We recommend the use of the GWR model in the prediction of oil or gas production when spatial non-stationarity exists.","PeriodicalId":11110,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, August 06, 2019","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, August 06, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/198847-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Spatial data exists practically everywhere, including the oil and gas industry. Several factors drive the distribution of the location of oil and gas wells: performance of existing wells, available acreage, need for operators to maintain a certain amount of production and to stay competitive. Some of the important parameters to consider in the design of a completion job for an unconventional oil and gas well are the length of lateral (and by extension perforated interval), number of stages, total pounds of proppants, total volume of fluid pumped, injection pressure and injection rate. In big data analytics and building of a regression model to capture the effects of these parameters on oil production, the practice has been to analyze wells in similar formations or similar basins, even when these wells are miles apart. Due to the presence of spatial autocorrelation and non-stationarity in such data, the recommended practice should be to take these spatial dependencies into account by using geographically weighted regression (GWR). In this paper, we present an application of GWR in location-based regression modeling to capture the effect of these completion parameters on the first six months of oil production in 5700 wells in the Bakken and Three Forks formation in North Dakota. GWR builds different models for every location, leading to a spatial distribution of variable coefficients. This model is well suited to capture both local and global variations in our dependent variable. We also compare the results obtained with that of three other models: multiple regression model, artificial neural network model and universal kriging. Just like the use of kriging, GWR model resulted in a much-improved prediction of oil production as captured by the goodness-of-fit diagnostics (R squared, AIC, and RMSPE), compared to the other two non-location-based models. We recommend the use of the GWR model in the prediction of oil or gas production when spatial non-stationarity exists.
应用地理加权回归方法模拟完井参数对原油产量的影响——以非常规井为例
空间数据几乎无处不在,包括石油和天然气行业。影响油气井位置分布的因素有:现有井的性能、可用面积、作业者维持一定产量和保持竞争力的需求。在设计非常规油气井完井作业时,需要考虑的一些重要参数包括水平段长度(以及通过扩大射孔段)、段数、支撑剂总重量、泵送流体总量、注入压力和注入速率。在大数据分析和建立回归模型以获取这些参数对石油产量的影响时,通常的做法是分析类似地层或类似盆地中的井,即使这些井相距数英里。由于这些数据存在空间自相关和非平稳性,建议的做法应该是通过使用地理加权回归(GWR)来考虑这些空间依赖性。在本文中,我们介绍了GWR在基于位置的回归模型中的应用,以捕获这些完井参数对北达科他州Bakken和Three Forks地层5700口井前六个月产油量的影响。GWR为每个位置建立不同的模型,导致变量系数的空间分布。这个模型非常适合捕捉因变量的局部和全局变化。并将所得结果与多元回归模型、人工神经网络模型和通用克里格模型进行了比较。与kriging方法一样,GWR模型通过拟合适应度诊断(R平方、AIC和RMSPE)对产油量进行了预测,与其他两种非基于位置的模型相比,GWR模型对产油量的预测得到了极大的改进。我们建议在存在空间非平稳性的情况下,使用GWR模型来预测油气产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信