Wall-Modeled Large-Eddy Simulation of a High Reynolds Number Separating and Reattaching Flow.

G. Park
{"title":"Wall-Modeled Large-Eddy Simulation of a High Reynolds Number Separating and Reattaching Flow.","authors":"G. Park","doi":"10.2514/1.J055745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The performance of two wall models based on Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes is compared in large-eddy simulation of a high Reynolds number separating and reattaching flow over the NASA wall-mounted hump. Wall modeling significantly improves flow prediction on a coarse grid where the large-eddy simulation with the no-slip wall boundary condition fails. Low-order statistics from the wall-modeled large-eddy simulation are in good agreement with the experiment. Wall-pressure fluctuations from the resolved-scale solution are in good agreement with the experiment, whereas wall shear-stress fluctuations modeled entirely through the wall models appear to be significantly underpredicted. Although the two wall models produce comparable results in the upstream attached flow region, the nonequilibrium wall model outperforms the equilibrium wall model in the separation bubble and recovery region where the key assumptions in the equilibrium model are shown to be invalid.","PeriodicalId":80384,"journal":{"name":"AIAA student journal. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"52","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIAA student journal. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J055745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

Abstract

The performance of two wall models based on Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes is compared in large-eddy simulation of a high Reynolds number separating and reattaching flow over the NASA wall-mounted hump. Wall modeling significantly improves flow prediction on a coarse grid where the large-eddy simulation with the no-slip wall boundary condition fails. Low-order statistics from the wall-modeled large-eddy simulation are in good agreement with the experiment. Wall-pressure fluctuations from the resolved-scale solution are in good agreement with the experiment, whereas wall shear-stress fluctuations modeled entirely through the wall models appear to be significantly underpredicted. Although the two wall models produce comparable results in the upstream attached flow region, the nonequilibrium wall model outperforms the equilibrium wall model in the separation bubble and recovery region where the key assumptions in the equilibrium model are shown to be invalid.
高雷诺数分离与再附着流动的壁型大涡模拟。
比较了基于Reynolds-average Navier-Stokes的两种壁面模型在NASA壁挂式驼峰高雷诺数分离与再附着流大涡模拟中的性能。在粗糙网格条件下,壁面建模显著改善了无滑移壁面边界条件下大涡模拟的流动预测效果。壁式大涡模拟的低阶统计量与实验结果吻合较好。解析尺度解的壁面压力波动与实验结果吻合较好,而完全通过壁面模型模拟的壁面剪切应力波动似乎被严重低估。尽管两种壁面模型在上游附著流区产生的结果相当,但非平衡壁面模型在分离泡和恢复区优于平衡壁面模型,在分离泡和恢复区,平衡模型的关键假设被证明是无效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信