Politicization from Below? The Deportation Issue in Public Discourse in Austria, Switzerland, and Germany

D. Ruedin, S. Meyer
{"title":"Politicization from Below? The Deportation Issue in Public Discourse in Austria, Switzerland, and Germany","authors":"D. Ruedin, S. Meyer","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2480614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deportation has become a central element of immigration control, particularly of asylum seekers whose application has been rejected. For a long time deportation has been a non-issue in public discourse, implemented without significant public opposition or publicity. More recently, however, feelings of unease and moral outrage have emerged among certain sections of the population and the general public, manifesting themselves in various forms of protest against the deportation of individuals: deportation has become contested and politicized. We analyse the politicization of deportation in three countries – Austria, Germany, Switzerland – between 1993 and 2013 drawing on media coverage on the issue. Different from immigration, which is top-down politicized by governmental and party actors, it seems that the politicization of deportation is mainly bottom-up. Individuals threatened by deportation and NGOs and churches are the dominant actors in protests against deportations. Protest is about as likely to focus on individual deportation cases than policy. Unconventional forms of political participation are common, but once the issue of deportation has become politicized political parties increasingly join the debate.","PeriodicalId":81320,"journal":{"name":"Georgetown immigration law journal","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgetown immigration law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2480614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Deportation has become a central element of immigration control, particularly of asylum seekers whose application has been rejected. For a long time deportation has been a non-issue in public discourse, implemented without significant public opposition or publicity. More recently, however, feelings of unease and moral outrage have emerged among certain sections of the population and the general public, manifesting themselves in various forms of protest against the deportation of individuals: deportation has become contested and politicized. We analyse the politicization of deportation in three countries – Austria, Germany, Switzerland – between 1993 and 2013 drawing on media coverage on the issue. Different from immigration, which is top-down politicized by governmental and party actors, it seems that the politicization of deportation is mainly bottom-up. Individuals threatened by deportation and NGOs and churches are the dominant actors in protests against deportations. Protest is about as likely to focus on individual deportation cases than policy. Unconventional forms of political participation are common, but once the issue of deportation has become politicized political parties increasingly join the debate.
自下而上的政治化?奥地利、瑞士和德国公共话语中的驱逐问题
驱逐出境已成为移民管制的中心内容,特别是对申请被拒绝的寻求庇护者而言。长期以来,驱逐出境一直不是公共话语中的一个问题,在没有明显的公众反对或宣传的情况下实施。然而,最近在人口的某些部分和一般公众中出现了不安和道义上的愤怒,表现为对驱逐个人的各种形式的抗议:驱逐已成为争议和政治化。我们分析了1993年至2013年间三个国家——奥地利、德国和瑞士——驱逐出境的政治化情况,并借鉴了媒体对该问题的报道。与移民问题由政府和政党自上而下的政治化不同,驱逐出境问题的政治化似乎主要是自下而上的。受到驱逐威胁的个人以及非政府组织和教会是抗议驱逐的主要行为者。抗议活动关注个人驱逐案件的可能性与关注政策的可能性差不多。非常规的政治参与形式很常见,但一旦驱逐出境问题变得政治化,政党就会越来越多地加入辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信