How Malaysia Late Life Field Benefited From Well Intervention Efficiency Improvements Through Integrated Operations

S. Mokhtar, Rahmat Wibisono, M. Zakaria
{"title":"How Malaysia Late Life Field Benefited From Well Intervention Efficiency Improvements Through Integrated Operations","authors":"S. Mokhtar, Rahmat Wibisono, M. Zakaria","doi":"10.2118/195843-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In 2016, Malaysia Petroleum Management (MPM), the regulatory body of PETRONAS launched a 3 year dedicated strategy to intensify the idle wells restoration and production enhancement activities in order to maximize profitability through efficiency and success rate improvement. The basis of this strategy is the risk-sharing integrated operations in which the industry embraced it in all major well intervention activities. As the drilling activities dropped drastically over the past few years, it was crucial that the well intervention activities are carried out with high efficiency and success rate to restore the production.\n The strategy went through various development changes throughout the 3 year journey. As the well intervention scope covers a wide range of activities, the framework of this integrated risk sharing mechanism provided the flexibility that is required for the execution of the various scopes and meet specific value targets either profitability from production gain or cost saving from decommissioning and infill drilling. Each of the project carried unique Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) as the guiding principles to drive the efficiency improvement that was required. A unique process called Total Wells Management (TWM) was implemented as the overlaying guide to further improve the uncertainty of subsurface challenges, operation optimization and commercial risk exposure.\n This paper outlines the overall post mortem analysis of the 22 projects that were executed under this integrated operations strategy between MPM, ten operators and five main service companies. This strategy, known to the industry as the Integrated Idle Wells Restoration (IIWR) program, has become the new norm on how well intervention and subsurface assessments are executed to yield the best results especially in late life fields. The risk sharing integrated framework have proven to be a win-win scenario for all involved parties. The scope was also extended to cover non production adding activities such as wells decommissioning, well startups and pre drilling zonal isolation. IIWR have also opened up the opportunities for many ‘first in Malaysia’ projects such as the first subsea hydraulic intervention, first subsea decommissioning and also the reinstatement of technologies such as coiled tubing catenary. The biggest impact from this 3 years strategy implementation can be seen from the Unit Enhancement Cost (UEC) improvement where the average UEC was reduced from 14 to 17 USD per barrel of oil to about 4 to 7 USD barrel of oil.\n Although there were major challenges, the overall results have been very encouraging. This framework is also being replicated for drilling and completion activities as well. Specific to well intervention, this IIWR framework is currently being put through an enhancement process to further expand the landscape of well intervention activities without compromising safety, operational efficiency and business profitability.","PeriodicalId":10909,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/195843-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2016, Malaysia Petroleum Management (MPM), the regulatory body of PETRONAS launched a 3 year dedicated strategy to intensify the idle wells restoration and production enhancement activities in order to maximize profitability through efficiency and success rate improvement. The basis of this strategy is the risk-sharing integrated operations in which the industry embraced it in all major well intervention activities. As the drilling activities dropped drastically over the past few years, it was crucial that the well intervention activities are carried out with high efficiency and success rate to restore the production. The strategy went through various development changes throughout the 3 year journey. As the well intervention scope covers a wide range of activities, the framework of this integrated risk sharing mechanism provided the flexibility that is required for the execution of the various scopes and meet specific value targets either profitability from production gain or cost saving from decommissioning and infill drilling. Each of the project carried unique Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) as the guiding principles to drive the efficiency improvement that was required. A unique process called Total Wells Management (TWM) was implemented as the overlaying guide to further improve the uncertainty of subsurface challenges, operation optimization and commercial risk exposure. This paper outlines the overall post mortem analysis of the 22 projects that were executed under this integrated operations strategy between MPM, ten operators and five main service companies. This strategy, known to the industry as the Integrated Idle Wells Restoration (IIWR) program, has become the new norm on how well intervention and subsurface assessments are executed to yield the best results especially in late life fields. The risk sharing integrated framework have proven to be a win-win scenario for all involved parties. The scope was also extended to cover non production adding activities such as wells decommissioning, well startups and pre drilling zonal isolation. IIWR have also opened up the opportunities for many ‘first in Malaysia’ projects such as the first subsea hydraulic intervention, first subsea decommissioning and also the reinstatement of technologies such as coiled tubing catenary. The biggest impact from this 3 years strategy implementation can be seen from the Unit Enhancement Cost (UEC) improvement where the average UEC was reduced from 14 to 17 USD per barrel of oil to about 4 to 7 USD barrel of oil. Although there were major challenges, the overall results have been very encouraging. This framework is also being replicated for drilling and completion activities as well. Specific to well intervention, this IIWR framework is currently being put through an enhancement process to further expand the landscape of well intervention activities without compromising safety, operational efficiency and business profitability.
马来西亚油田如何通过综合作业提高修井效率
2016年,马来西亚国家石油公司(PETRONAS)的监管机构马来西亚石油管理公司(MPM)启动了一项为期3年的专门战略,旨在加强闲置井的恢复和增产活动,以通过提高效率和成功率来实现盈利最大化。该策略的基础是风险共担的综合作业,业界在所有主要的油井干预活动中都采用了该策略。在过去的几年里,钻井活动急剧减少,为了恢复生产,高效、成功率地进行油井干预活动至关重要。该战略在3年的历程中经历了各种发展变化。由于油井干预范围涵盖了广泛的活动,这种综合风险分担机制的框架提供了执行各种范围所需的灵活性,并满足特定的价值目标,无论是从生产中获得盈利,还是从退役和填充钻井中节省成本。每个项目都有独特的关键绩效指标(kpi)作为指导原则,以推动所需的效率改进。采用了一种独特的全井管理(TWM)工艺,作为覆盖指南,进一步改善了地下挑战的不确定性、作业优化和商业风险暴露。本文概述了在MPM、10家运营商和5家主要服务公司的综合运营策略下执行的22个项目的总体事后分析。该策略被业内称为综合闲置井恢复(IIWR)计划,已成为油井干预和地下评估的新标准,以获得最佳效果,特别是在后期油田。事实证明,风险分担综合框架对所有有关各方都是一个双赢的方案。该范围还扩展到非生产活动,如油井停产、油井启动和钻井前层间隔离。IIWR还为许多“马来西亚第一”项目开辟了机会,例如第一次海底液压干预,第一次海底退役以及连续油管悬链线等技术的恢复。这三年战略实施的最大影响可以从单位提高成本(UEC)的改善中看到,平均UEC从每桶14至17美元降至每桶约4至7美元。虽然存在重大挑战,但总体结果是非常令人鼓舞的。该框架也被复制到钻井和完井活动中。具体到修井作业,该IIWR框架目前正在进行改进,以进一步扩大修井作业的范围,同时不影响安全性、作业效率和业务盈利能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信