Retrospective Study of the Distal Biceps Tendon Repair Using “All-suture” Soft Anchors

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
S. Metikala, Zena Saleh, Dov A. Bader, W. Sebastianelli, P. Sherbondy
{"title":"Retrospective Study of the Distal Biceps Tendon Repair Using “All-suture” Soft Anchors","authors":"S. Metikala, Zena Saleh, Dov A. Bader, W. Sebastianelli, P. Sherbondy","doi":"10.1097/BTO.0000000000000555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Distal biceps repair is commonly performed using various fixation devices, each having its advantages and drawbacks. All-suture soft anchor (ASSA) is a recent device mitigating some of the issues associated with previous devices. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study including 20 patients (21 ruptures) aims to evaluate the safety and functionality of ASSA by modified tension-slide technique. All operations were performed through a single-incision anterior approach using two 2.9 mm anchors. All but 1 were men with a mean age of 50.5 years. The mean duration from injury to surgery was 14 days. Results: At a mean follow-up of 11.8 months, compared with contralateral extremity, 18 (86%) of 21 regained full biceps strength with 5/5 flexion-supination power, while 3 displayed 4/5 power. All, except 1, returned to the previous level of function at an average of 24 weeks. As per the modified Mayo Elbow Performance Index, 18 (86%) achieved excellent and 3 (14%) had good results. Complications included lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve palsy in 12 (resolved in 10), superficial radial nerve palsy in 1 (resolved), and heterotopic ossification in 1. No device-related complications or reruptures were noted. Conclusion: Primary repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures through the use of the ASSA is a viable option, which in conjunction with the proposed modification of tension-slide suture fixation technique yields clinically objective and functional results. Level of Evidence: Level IV—therapeutic.","PeriodicalId":45336,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Orthopaedics","volume":"42 1","pages":"142 - 148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BTO.0000000000000555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Distal biceps repair is commonly performed using various fixation devices, each having its advantages and drawbacks. All-suture soft anchor (ASSA) is a recent device mitigating some of the issues associated with previous devices. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study including 20 patients (21 ruptures) aims to evaluate the safety and functionality of ASSA by modified tension-slide technique. All operations were performed through a single-incision anterior approach using two 2.9 mm anchors. All but 1 were men with a mean age of 50.5 years. The mean duration from injury to surgery was 14 days. Results: At a mean follow-up of 11.8 months, compared with contralateral extremity, 18 (86%) of 21 regained full biceps strength with 5/5 flexion-supination power, while 3 displayed 4/5 power. All, except 1, returned to the previous level of function at an average of 24 weeks. As per the modified Mayo Elbow Performance Index, 18 (86%) achieved excellent and 3 (14%) had good results. Complications included lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve palsy in 12 (resolved in 10), superficial radial nerve palsy in 1 (resolved), and heterotopic ossification in 1. No device-related complications or reruptures were noted. Conclusion: Primary repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures through the use of the ASSA is a viable option, which in conjunction with the proposed modification of tension-slide suture fixation technique yields clinically objective and functional results. Level of Evidence: Level IV—therapeutic.
“全缝合”软锚钉修复肱二头肌远端肌腱的回顾性研究
简介:肱二头肌远端修复通常使用各种固定装置进行,每种固定装置都有其优点和缺点。全缝合软锚(ASSA)是一种最新的设备,减轻了以前设备相关的一些问题。材料和方法:本回顾性研究包括20例患者(21例破裂),旨在通过改良张力滑动技术评估ASSA的安全性和功能。所有手术均采用单切口前路,使用两个2.9 mm锚钉。除1人外,其余均为男性,平均年龄为50.5岁。从受伤到手术的平均时间为14天。结果:平均随访11.8个月,与对侧肢体相比,21例患者中有18例(86%)恢复了完整的肱二头肌力量,屈旋力为5/5,3例恢复了4/5。除1名患者外,其余患者均在平均24周后恢复到原来的功能水平。根据改良的Mayo肘关节表现指数,18例(86%)达到优异,3例(14%)达到良好。并发症包括12例臂前外侧皮神经麻痹(10例缓解),1例桡浅神经麻痹(缓解),1例异位骨化。无器械相关并发症或复发。结论:使用ASSA对二头肌远端肌腱断裂进行一期修复是一种可行的选择,并结合所提出的张力滑动缝合固定技术的改良,可获得临床客观和功能性的结果。证据等级:iv级:治疗性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The purpose of Techniques in Orthopaedics is to provide information on the latest orthopaedic procedure as they are devised and used by top orthopaedic surgeons. The approach is technique-oriented, covering operations, manipulations, and instruments being developed and applied in such as arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and trauma. Each issue is guest-edited by an expert in the field and devoted to a single topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信