Comparing the Effectiveness of group Dialectical Behavior Therapy and Solution-Focused Brief Therapy on Self-Esteem, Cognitive-Emotional Regulation and Non-Suicidal Self-Injury in daughters

Q4 Social Sciences
Ghazal Yasfard, Z. A. Azar, S. A. H. Almadani
{"title":"Comparing the Effectiveness of group Dialectical Behavior Therapy and Solution-Focused Brief Therapy on Self-Esteem, Cognitive-Emotional Regulation and Non-Suicidal Self-Injury in daughters","authors":"Ghazal Yasfard, Z. A. Azar, S. A. H. Almadani","doi":"10.29252/ijhehp.7.4.343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objective: Today, self-injury behavior has a significant prevalence among adolescents. The purpose of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) and solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT) on self-esteem, cognitive emotion regulation, and non-suicidal self-injury behavior. Materials and Methods: This study was Quasi-experimental research. The statistical population consisted of 45 students studying in junior high school in Pardis city (2017-2018). They were committed non-suicidal self-injury behavior at least for once. Using random access sampling method, the sample divided into two experimental groups and a control group (n1 = n2 = n3 = 15). The research tools included Eysenck’s self-esteem questionnaire (1976), Garnefski and Kraaij’s cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire (2006), and Klonowski and Glenn’s self-injurious behaviors and functions (2009). Experimental groups were under the dialectical behavior therapy and solution-focused (brief) therapy. The data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of covariance. Results: There was a significant difference between the effectiveness of dialectical behavior therapy with solution-focused brief therapy on reducing self-injury behavior (p <0/001) and cognitive emotion regulation (p<0/05). There wasn’t any significant difference in self-esteem variable. The mean scores of selfinjury behavior for the dialectical behavior therapy group in post-test was significantly lower than the mean scores of the solution-focused brief therapy group and the control group. The mean of the dialectical behavior therapy group after a positive reappraisal was significantly higher than the mean of the control group. Conclusion: The method of dialectical behavior therapy compared to Solutionfocused therapy has a greater impact on increasing the positive reappraisal subscale in cognitive emotion regulation and decreasing self-injury behavior.","PeriodicalId":36058,"journal":{"name":"Health Education and Health Promotion","volume":"27 1","pages":"343-358"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/ijhehp.7.4.343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background and Objective: Today, self-injury behavior has a significant prevalence among adolescents. The purpose of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) and solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT) on self-esteem, cognitive emotion regulation, and non-suicidal self-injury behavior. Materials and Methods: This study was Quasi-experimental research. The statistical population consisted of 45 students studying in junior high school in Pardis city (2017-2018). They were committed non-suicidal self-injury behavior at least for once. Using random access sampling method, the sample divided into two experimental groups and a control group (n1 = n2 = n3 = 15). The research tools included Eysenck’s self-esteem questionnaire (1976), Garnefski and Kraaij’s cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire (2006), and Klonowski and Glenn’s self-injurious behaviors and functions (2009). Experimental groups were under the dialectical behavior therapy and solution-focused (brief) therapy. The data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of covariance. Results: There was a significant difference between the effectiveness of dialectical behavior therapy with solution-focused brief therapy on reducing self-injury behavior (p <0/001) and cognitive emotion regulation (p<0/05). There wasn’t any significant difference in self-esteem variable. The mean scores of selfinjury behavior for the dialectical behavior therapy group in post-test was significantly lower than the mean scores of the solution-focused brief therapy group and the control group. The mean of the dialectical behavior therapy group after a positive reappraisal was significantly higher than the mean of the control group. Conclusion: The method of dialectical behavior therapy compared to Solutionfocused therapy has a greater impact on increasing the positive reappraisal subscale in cognitive emotion regulation and decreasing self-injury behavior.
团体辩证行为疗法与解决导向简短疗法对女儿自尊、认知情绪调节和非自杀性自伤的效果比较
背景与目的:目前,自伤行为在青少年中非常普遍。本研究的目的是比较辩证行为疗法(DBT)和专注于解决问题的简短疗法(SFBT)在自尊、认知情绪调节和非自杀性自伤行为方面的效果。材料与方法:本研究为准实验研究。统计人群为45名在Pardis市读初中的学生(2017-2018)。他们至少有过一次非自杀性自残行为。采用随机存取抽样方法,将样本分为两个实验组和一个对照组(n1 = n2 = n3 = 15)。研究工具包括Eysenck自尊问卷(1976)、Garnefski和Kraaij认知情绪调节问卷(2006)和Klonowski和Glenn自伤行为与功能问卷(2009)。实验组采用辩证行为疗法和解决焦点(简短)疗法。数据采用多变量协方差分析。结果:辩证行为疗法与以解决问题为中心的简短疗法在减少自伤行为和认知情绪调节方面的效果有显著差异(p< 0/001)。在自尊变量上没有显著差异。辩证行为治疗组自我伤害行为的后测平均分显著低于专注于解决问题的简短治疗组和对照组的平均分。辩证行为治疗组经正面重评后的均数显著高于对照组均数。结论:辩证行为疗法在提高认知情绪调节的积极重评分量表和减少自伤行为方面比解决焦点疗法有更大的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Education and Health Promotion
Health Education and Health Promotion Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信