From Belarus to Black Lives Matter: Rethinking protests in Belarus through a transnational feminist perspective

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Tatsiana Shchurko
{"title":"From Belarus to Black Lives Matter: Rethinking protests in Belarus through a transnational feminist perspective","authors":"Tatsiana Shchurko","doi":"10.17356/ieejsp.v8i4.1007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the lack of solidarity between the Black Lives Matter protests in the U.S. and the anti-authoritarian uprising in Belarus in 2020. Specifically, I explore how distant geographies and feminist communities can relate to each other and thus challenge the rise of right-wing conservatism, white supremacy, and neoliberal authoritarianism. This article relies on auto-ethnography and the exploration of public media, political essays, and scholarly contributions discussing the meanings of the BLM and Belarusian protests. Through critical self-reflection and by deploying the concepts of ‘exile’ and ‘transnational feminist solidarity,’ this article suggests a possibility for alternative transnational feminist connections attentive to the complexities of global power relations and uneven east/west interconnections. Rethinking the current possibilities for solidarities may lead to seeing how the uprising in Belarus and the BLM protests have points of connection on the grounds of state-sanctioned violence, neoliberal enclosures, suppression of political dissent, and their racialized/colonial roots. However, forging transnational solidarities also requires a certain work of reflection on how political protests may uphold global racial/colonial logic and overshadow racial violence. Therefore, in this article, I foreground how post-Soviet vulnerability may help disrupt the status quo or the privilege of whiteness instead of reinforcing it.","PeriodicalId":31153,"journal":{"name":"Intersections","volume":"91 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intersections","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v8i4.1007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the lack of solidarity between the Black Lives Matter protests in the U.S. and the anti-authoritarian uprising in Belarus in 2020. Specifically, I explore how distant geographies and feminist communities can relate to each other and thus challenge the rise of right-wing conservatism, white supremacy, and neoliberal authoritarianism. This article relies on auto-ethnography and the exploration of public media, political essays, and scholarly contributions discussing the meanings of the BLM and Belarusian protests. Through critical self-reflection and by deploying the concepts of ‘exile’ and ‘transnational feminist solidarity,’ this article suggests a possibility for alternative transnational feminist connections attentive to the complexities of global power relations and uneven east/west interconnections. Rethinking the current possibilities for solidarities may lead to seeing how the uprising in Belarus and the BLM protests have points of connection on the grounds of state-sanctioned violence, neoliberal enclosures, suppression of political dissent, and their racialized/colonial roots. However, forging transnational solidarities also requires a certain work of reflection on how political protests may uphold global racial/colonial logic and overshadow racial violence. Therefore, in this article, I foreground how post-Soviet vulnerability may help disrupt the status quo or the privilege of whiteness instead of reinforcing it.
从白俄罗斯到黑人的命也重要:从跨国女权主义的视角重新思考白俄罗斯的抗议活动
本文探讨了美国“黑人的命也是命”抗议活动与2020年白俄罗斯反独裁起义之间缺乏团结。具体来说,我探讨了地理位置和女权主义社区之间的距离,从而挑战右翼保守主义、白人至上主义和新自由主义威权主义的兴起。这篇文章依赖于自动人种学和公共媒体的探索,政治论文,以及讨论BLM和白俄罗斯抗议意义的学术贡献。通过批判性的自我反思和运用“流亡”和“跨国女权主义团结”的概念,本文提出了另一种跨国女权主义联系的可能性,这种联系关注全球权力关系的复杂性和东西方不平衡的相互联系。重新思考当前团结的可能性,可能会让我们看到白俄罗斯的起义和BLM抗议活动如何在国家认可的暴力、新自由主义的包围、对政治异议的压制及其种族化/殖民根源的基础上有联系。然而,建立跨国团结也需要对政治抗议如何维护全球种族/殖民逻辑并掩盖种族暴力进行一定的反思。因此,在本文中,我强调后苏联时代的脆弱性可能会破坏现状或白人的特权,而不是加强它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intersections
Intersections Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Intersections is a peer-reviewed series on interdisciplinary topics in early modern studies. Contributions may come from any of the disciplines within the humanities, such as history, art history, literary history, book history, church history, social history, cultural history, and history of ideas. Each volume focuses on a single theme and consists of essays that explore new perspectives on the subject of study. The series aims to open up new areas of research on early modern culture and to address issues of interest to a wide range of disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书