Comparison between the Effects of Core Stability Exercise and Manual Therapy in Athletes with Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain

B. Dass, K. Zutshi, M. Pp, J. Munjal, SolankyA
{"title":"Comparison between the Effects of Core Stability Exercise and Manual Therapy in Athletes with Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain","authors":"B. Dass, K. Zutshi, M. Pp, J. Munjal, SolankyA","doi":"10.4172/2324-9080.1000274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare between the effects of core stability exercise and manual therapy in athletes with non-specific mechanical low back pain.Short-term pre-test posttest randomized experimental study.Setting: JLN Stadium, SAI, New Delhi.Participants: 30 subjects with non-specific low back pain divided in three groups (n=10) (mean age ± standard deviation, 19.9 ± 2.64, 21.0 ± 3.23, 19.1 ± 2.37 years for control, manual and core group respectively).Intervention: Each of the 30 subjects was randomly assigned into one of three treatment programs for 3 days per week for 5 weeks. Group A was the control group, received hot pack, along with normal warm-up and cool down that the athletes undergo during training session. Group B and C were the experimental group for manual therapy and core stability exercise group respectively. In the experimental group also, the subjects were given hot pack and warm up and cool down common as per their training programmer. Schober’s test, plank test, 30ft shuttle run test, lbp questionnaire and self-confidence questionnaire were the dependent variables and were assessed before and after the intervention.Results: There was statistically improvement in the baseline measures- plank test, 30ft shuttle run test, lbp questionnaire and self-confidence questionnaire- in the manual group.Conclusion: The data signifies that active rehabilitation approach has definitely a positive effect in decreasing the symptoms of nonspecific lbp in athletes. The experimental hypothesis regarding manual therapy being significant was valid due to the significance of values in parameters- 30ft shuttle run, plank test, LBP questionnaire and self-confidence questionnaire. No doubt, the result was more significant in manual group but the difference is not that wide. Yet that’s suggestive of core also has some significant effect but less than manual.","PeriodicalId":90574,"journal":{"name":"Journal of athletic enhancement","volume":"71 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of athletic enhancement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2324-9080.1000274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare between the effects of core stability exercise and manual therapy in athletes with non-specific mechanical low back pain.Short-term pre-test posttest randomized experimental study.Setting: JLN Stadium, SAI, New Delhi.Participants: 30 subjects with non-specific low back pain divided in three groups (n=10) (mean age ± standard deviation, 19.9 ± 2.64, 21.0 ± 3.23, 19.1 ± 2.37 years for control, manual and core group respectively).Intervention: Each of the 30 subjects was randomly assigned into one of three treatment programs for 3 days per week for 5 weeks. Group A was the control group, received hot pack, along with normal warm-up and cool down that the athletes undergo during training session. Group B and C were the experimental group for manual therapy and core stability exercise group respectively. In the experimental group also, the subjects were given hot pack and warm up and cool down common as per their training programmer. Schober’s test, plank test, 30ft shuttle run test, lbp questionnaire and self-confidence questionnaire were the dependent variables and were assessed before and after the intervention.Results: There was statistically improvement in the baseline measures- plank test, 30ft shuttle run test, lbp questionnaire and self-confidence questionnaire- in the manual group.Conclusion: The data signifies that active rehabilitation approach has definitely a positive effect in decreasing the symptoms of nonspecific lbp in athletes. The experimental hypothesis regarding manual therapy being significant was valid due to the significance of values in parameters- 30ft shuttle run, plank test, LBP questionnaire and self-confidence questionnaire. No doubt, the result was more significant in manual group but the difference is not that wide. Yet that’s suggestive of core also has some significant effect but less than manual.
核心稳定性训练与手工疗法治疗非特异性机械性腰痛的疗效比较
目的:比较核心稳定性训练与手工疗法治疗非特异性机械性腰痛的疗效。短期前测后测随机实验研究。地点:新德里SAI JLN体育场参与者:30例非特异性腰痛患者分为3组(n=10)(平均年龄±标准差,对照组、手动组和核心组分别为19.9±2.64、21.0±3.23、19.1±2.37岁)。干预:30名受试者被随机分配到三个治疗方案中的一个,每周3天,持续5周。A组是对照组,接受热敷,以及运动员在训练期间进行的正常热身和降温。B组为手工治疗试验组,C组为核心稳定性锻炼试验组。在实验组中,受试者也按照他们的训练计划进行热敷和热身和降温。以Schober测验、平板支撑测验、30英尺穿梭跑测验、lbp问卷和自信心问卷为因变量,分别在干预前后进行评估。结果:手工组在平板支撑测试、30英尺穿梭跑测试、lbp问卷和自信心问卷的基线测量上均有统计学意义上的改善。结论:积极康复方法对减轻运动员非特异性腰痛症状有明显的积极作用。30英尺穿梭跑、平板支撑测试、腰痛问卷和自信问卷等参数值的显著性证明手工疗法显著性的实验假设是有效的。毫无疑问,手工组的结果更为显著,但差异并没有那么大。然而,这也暗示了核心也有一些显着的效果,但不如手动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书