Is massage an effective intervention in the management of post-operative scarring? A scoping review.

IF 0.9 Q4 REHABILITATION
Hand Therapy Pub Date : 2022-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jht.2022.01.004
Helen C Scott, Claire Stockdale, Andrea Robinson, Luke S Robinson, Ted Brown
{"title":"Is massage an effective intervention in the management of post-operative scarring? A scoping review.","authors":"Helen C Scott, Claire Stockdale, Andrea Robinson, Luke S Robinson, Ted Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2022.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Scar massage is a widely used treatment modality in hand therapy. This intervention is thoroughly discussed in the literature relating to burns rehabilitation, however, the evidence for its use in treating linear scars following surgery is limited.</p><p><strong>Purpose of study: </strong>To collate the empirical literature on scar massage for the treatment of postsurgical cutaneous scars.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Scoping review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, and the Joanna Briggs Institute were searched from inception to December 2020. Two researchers used a data extraction tool to record key demographic, intervention and outcome data, and to apply the Oxford Levels of Evidence for each study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting on a combined sample of 1515 participants. Only two papers addressed hand or wrist scars (92 participants). While all studies reported favorable outcomes for scar massage, there were 45 different outcome measures used and a propensity towards non-standardized assessment. Intervention protocols varied from a single session to three treatments daily for 6 months. The results from 13 studies were confounded by the implementation of additional rehabilitation interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The overall findings suggest that while there may be benefits to scar massage in reducing pain, increasing movement and improving scar characteristics; there is a lack of consistent research methods, intervention protocols and outcome measures. This scoping review highlights the heterogenous nature of research into scar massage following surgery and supports the need for further research to substantiate its use in the clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":43971,"journal":{"name":"Hand Therapy","volume":"58 1","pages":"186-199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2022.01.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Scar massage is a widely used treatment modality in hand therapy. This intervention is thoroughly discussed in the literature relating to burns rehabilitation, however, the evidence for its use in treating linear scars following surgery is limited.

Purpose of study: To collate the empirical literature on scar massage for the treatment of postsurgical cutaneous scars.

Study design: Scoping review.

Methods: Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, and the Joanna Briggs Institute were searched from inception to December 2020. Two researchers used a data extraction tool to record key demographic, intervention and outcome data, and to apply the Oxford Levels of Evidence for each study.

Results: Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting on a combined sample of 1515 participants. Only two papers addressed hand or wrist scars (92 participants). While all studies reported favorable outcomes for scar massage, there were 45 different outcome measures used and a propensity towards non-standardized assessment. Intervention protocols varied from a single session to three treatments daily for 6 months. The results from 13 studies were confounded by the implementation of additional rehabilitation interventions.

Conclusions: The overall findings suggest that while there may be benefits to scar massage in reducing pain, increasing movement and improving scar characteristics; there is a lack of consistent research methods, intervention protocols and outcome measures. This scoping review highlights the heterogenous nature of research into scar massage following surgery and supports the need for further research to substantiate its use in the clinical setting.

按摩是治疗术后瘢痕形成的有效干预措施吗?范围审查。
背景:疤痕按摩是手部治疗中广泛应用的一种治疗方式。有关烧伤康复的文献中对这种干预进行了深入的讨论,然而,其用于治疗手术后线性疤痕的证据有限。研究目的:整理瘢痕按摩治疗术后皮肤瘢痕的经验文献。研究设计:范围审查。方法:检索自成立至2020年12月的Medline、EMBASE、CINAHL、AMED、Scopus、ProQuest disserthesis & Theses Global和Joanna Briggs Institute。两名研究人员使用数据提取工具记录关键的人口统计、干预和结果数据,并为每项研究应用牛津证据水平。结果:25项研究符合纳入标准,报告了1515名参与者的联合样本。只有两篇论文涉及手或手腕疤痕(92名参与者)。虽然所有的研究都报告了疤痕按摩的良好结果,但使用了45种不同的结果测量方法,并且倾向于非标准化评估。干预方案从每天一次治疗到每天三次治疗,持续6个月。13项研究的结果与实施额外的康复干预相混淆。结论:总体研究结果表明,虽然疤痕按摩在减轻疼痛、增加运动和改善疤痕特征方面可能有好处;缺乏一致的研究方法、干预方案和结果衡量标准。这一范围综述强调了手术后疤痕按摩研究的异质性,并支持需要进一步研究以证实其在临床环境中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hand Therapy
Hand Therapy REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信