{"title":"The interface between grammar and bodily enactment in ASL and English","authors":"D. Quinto-Pozos, Fey Parrill, Caitie Coons","doi":"10.1075/lic.00023.qui","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Users of signed and spoken languages regularly engage bodily enactment (commonly referred to as\n constructed action [CA] for signers and character viewpoint gestures [CVPT] for speakers)\n for the creation of meaning, but comparatively few studies have addressed how linguistic grammar interfaces with such gestural\n depictive devices across language modalities. CVPT gestures have been shown to co-occur with spoken language transitive verbs, and\n when a reference is definite or more accessible in the discourse. In sign, CA often alternates sequentially with fully\n conventionalized signs. In both CVPT and CA demonstrations, syntactic and pragmatic factors appear to be important. In this work,\n we consider these patterns by examining short retellings of video-based elicitation stimuli (silent-movie segments) from 10 deaf\n users of ASL (American Sign Language) and 20 hearing speakers of English. We describe examples of signs and words that co-occur\n with or precede specific instances of CA and CVPT. We also examine distributions and degrees of enactment across participants in\n order to consider the question of gesture threshold (Hostetter and Alibali, 2008, 2019). We provide various examples of how gestural material interfaces with linguistic grammar, which has implications for syntactic theory and possible grammatical constraints on such communicative devices.","PeriodicalId":43502,"journal":{"name":"Languages in Contrast","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Languages in Contrast","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.00023.qui","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Users of signed and spoken languages regularly engage bodily enactment (commonly referred to as
constructed action [CA] for signers and character viewpoint gestures [CVPT] for speakers)
for the creation of meaning, but comparatively few studies have addressed how linguistic grammar interfaces with such gestural
depictive devices across language modalities. CVPT gestures have been shown to co-occur with spoken language transitive verbs, and
when a reference is definite or more accessible in the discourse. In sign, CA often alternates sequentially with fully
conventionalized signs. In both CVPT and CA demonstrations, syntactic and pragmatic factors appear to be important. In this work,
we consider these patterns by examining short retellings of video-based elicitation stimuli (silent-movie segments) from 10 deaf
users of ASL (American Sign Language) and 20 hearing speakers of English. We describe examples of signs and words that co-occur
with or precede specific instances of CA and CVPT. We also examine distributions and degrees of enactment across participants in
order to consider the question of gesture threshold (Hostetter and Alibali, 2008, 2019). We provide various examples of how gestural material interfaces with linguistic grammar, which has implications for syntactic theory and possible grammatical constraints on such communicative devices.
期刊介绍:
Languages in Contrast aims to publish contrastive studies of two or more languages. Any aspect of language may be covered, including vocabulary, phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, pragmatics, text and discourse, stylistics, sociolinguistics and psycholinguistics. Languages in Contrast welcomes interdisciplinary studies, particularly those that make links between contrastive linguistics and translation, lexicography, computational linguistics, language teaching, literary and linguistic computing, literary studies and cultural studies.