TRANSFORMATION OF SOVIET ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: UZBEKISTAN’S CASE STUDY IN JUDICIAL REVIEW OVER ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS

J. Nematov
{"title":"TRANSFORMATION OF SOVIET ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: UZBEKISTAN’S CASE STUDY IN JUDICIAL REVIEW OVER ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS","authors":"J. Nematov","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2020.1.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Judicial protection against individual and normative acts of the public administration continues to be problematic in Uzbekistan. One central reason for this mischief is the continuing prevalence of Soviet-style ideas and patterns in legal thinking as well as the legal practice. This article describes the problems of jurisdictions face when trying to overcome their Soviet heritage by developing legal protection in administrative matters, and analyses the strategies for the improvement of this situation. Key factors are a comprehensive and harmonised development of administrative procedure and administrative litigation in the field of legislation, and what might be termed a “constitutionalisation” of legal thinking, theory and teaching – i.e. the respect for values enshrined in Constitution such as the rule of law and access to judicial protection against the public administration – in the field of legal science. Uzbekistan is a good example how foreign partners and donors of international legal assistance can help strengthen these factors. This paper explores (1) to what extent Soviet thinking on judicial review over administrative acts has been set aside or to what extent is it still alive in today’s Uzbekistan, and (2) what are the transformation points of judicial review. Overall, I argue that Soviet thinking on judicial review over administrative acts has big change in legislation level under new regime of Uzbekistan, however legal reforms are not still accepted by legal practice, doctrine and legal education. To analyse these statements, the first step is to describe the main characteristics and legal reforms on judicial review over administrative acts taken in Soviet period (part II). Part III and IV analyses the current legal system and judicial practise of Uzbekistan. Lastly, I map out recent steps taken to introduce some reforms in the field of judicial review over administrative acts in Uzbekistan (part V).","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"129 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative law and process","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2020.1.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Judicial protection against individual and normative acts of the public administration continues to be problematic in Uzbekistan. One central reason for this mischief is the continuing prevalence of Soviet-style ideas and patterns in legal thinking as well as the legal practice. This article describes the problems of jurisdictions face when trying to overcome their Soviet heritage by developing legal protection in administrative matters, and analyses the strategies for the improvement of this situation. Key factors are a comprehensive and harmonised development of administrative procedure and administrative litigation in the field of legislation, and what might be termed a “constitutionalisation” of legal thinking, theory and teaching – i.e. the respect for values enshrined in Constitution such as the rule of law and access to judicial protection against the public administration – in the field of legal science. Uzbekistan is a good example how foreign partners and donors of international legal assistance can help strengthen these factors. This paper explores (1) to what extent Soviet thinking on judicial review over administrative acts has been set aside or to what extent is it still alive in today’s Uzbekistan, and (2) what are the transformation points of judicial review. Overall, I argue that Soviet thinking on judicial review over administrative acts has big change in legislation level under new regime of Uzbekistan, however legal reforms are not still accepted by legal practice, doctrine and legal education. To analyse these statements, the first step is to describe the main characteristics and legal reforms on judicial review over administrative acts taken in Soviet period (part II). Part III and IV analyses the current legal system and judicial practise of Uzbekistan. Lastly, I map out recent steps taken to introduce some reforms in the field of judicial review over administrative acts in Uzbekistan (part V).
苏联行政法的转型:乌兹别克斯坦行政行为司法审查的个案研究
在乌兹别克斯坦,针对个人和公共行政规范行为的司法保护仍然存在问题。造成这种危害的一个主要原因是苏联式的思想和模式在法律思维和法律实践中继续盛行。本文描述了司法管辖区在试图通过发展行政事务中的法律保护来克服苏联遗产时所面临的问题,并分析了改善这种情况的策略。关键因素是行政程序和行政诉讼在立法领域的全面和协调发展,以及法律思想、理论和教学的“宪制化”,即尊重宪法所载的价值观,如法治和在公共行政方面获得司法保护。乌兹别克斯坦是国际法律援助的外国伙伴和捐助者如何帮助加强这些因素的一个很好的例子。本文探讨(1)苏联关于行政行为司法审查的思想在多大程度上被搁置,或者在多大程度上仍然存在于今天的乌兹别克斯坦;(2)司法审查的转型点是什么。总体而言,笔者认为在乌兹别克斯坦新政权下,苏联关于行政行为司法审查的思想在立法层面发生了较大的变化,但法律改革仍未被法律实践、法律理论和法律教育所接受。为了分析这些说法,第一步是描述苏联时期行政行为司法审查的主要特征和法律改革(第二部分)。第三和第四部分分析了乌兹别克斯坦目前的法律制度和司法实践。最后,我列出最近为在乌兹别克斯坦对行政行为进行司法审查方面进行一些改革而采取的步骤(第五部分)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信