Attrition – A Criteria in Estimating the Age

A. Prakash, A. Reddy, M. Rajinikanth, G. Sreenath, S. Hussain, D. P. S. Harsha
{"title":"Attrition – A Criteria in Estimating the Age","authors":"A. Prakash, A. Reddy, M. Rajinikanth, G. Sreenath, S. Hussain, D. P. S. Harsha","doi":"10.18311/jfds/13/1/2021.699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: With respect to the recognition of an individual in forensic circumstances age assessment is an essential aspect. Teeth are considered to be least destructible part of the body under most conditions occurring in the nature like mass disasters. As the age advances, there will be physiological wearing away of the tooth due to tooth - tooth contacts, as in case of mastication. By knowing the level of attrition, age of an individual can be estimated. Microscopic investigation may not be achievable in certain instances and assessment of age relies on the sole examination of tooth by attrition. Aims: The aim of the research was meant to evaluate the age of individuals using Average Stage of Attrition (ASA) and Gustafson’s method and comparing efficacy of both the methods. Methods and Material: The study sample constituted 60 participants. Dental caries, restored crowns and patients with bruxism were excluded. The patients examined were in the age group of 35-60 years. Scores were evaluated by using Gustafson’s method and Average stage of attrition method. Statistical Analysis used: Regression Analysis. Results: The average stages of attrition and Gustafson’s scoring criteria were evaluated by conferring with the graduation standards. The data was collected and regression analyses were carried out for both the methods. By regression analysis, four regression equations for each method were obtained. Evaluation of attrition level and its accuracy in estimating the age by ASA method is more reliable than Gustafson’s attrition scoring.","PeriodicalId":89172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic dental sciences","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic dental sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18311/jfds/13/1/2021.699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: With respect to the recognition of an individual in forensic circumstances age assessment is an essential aspect. Teeth are considered to be least destructible part of the body under most conditions occurring in the nature like mass disasters. As the age advances, there will be physiological wearing away of the tooth due to tooth - tooth contacts, as in case of mastication. By knowing the level of attrition, age of an individual can be estimated. Microscopic investigation may not be achievable in certain instances and assessment of age relies on the sole examination of tooth by attrition. Aims: The aim of the research was meant to evaluate the age of individuals using Average Stage of Attrition (ASA) and Gustafson’s method and comparing efficacy of both the methods. Methods and Material: The study sample constituted 60 participants. Dental caries, restored crowns and patients with bruxism were excluded. The patients examined were in the age group of 35-60 years. Scores were evaluated by using Gustafson’s method and Average stage of attrition method. Statistical Analysis used: Regression Analysis. Results: The average stages of attrition and Gustafson’s scoring criteria were evaluated by conferring with the graduation standards. The data was collected and regression analyses were carried out for both the methods. By regression analysis, four regression equations for each method were obtained. Evaluation of attrition level and its accuracy in estimating the age by ASA method is more reliable than Gustafson’s attrition scoring.
磨损-估计年龄的一个标准
背景:关于在法医情况下对个人的识别,年龄评估是一个重要方面。牙齿被认为是在自然灾害等大多数情况下最不容易损坏的身体部位。随着年龄的增长,由于牙齿与牙齿的接触,就像咀嚼一样,牙齿会出现生理性磨损。通过了解损耗水平,就可以估计一个人的年龄。在某些情况下,显微镜检查可能无法实现,年龄的评估依赖于牙齿磨损的唯一检查。目的:本研究的目的是利用平均消耗阶段法(ASA)和古斯塔夫森法(Gustafson 's)对个体年龄进行评估,并比较两种方法的有效性。方法与材料:研究样本共60人。排除龋齿、修复牙冠及磨牙患者。患者年龄在35-60岁之间。采用Gustafson法和平均耗损阶段法进行评分。采用的统计分析:回归分析。结果:以毕业标准为参照,对平均磨耗阶段和Gustafson评分标准进行评价。收集数据并对两种方法进行回归分析。通过回归分析,得到每种方法的4个回归方程。ASA法估计年龄的磨损水平及其准确性比Gustafson的磨损评分更可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书