The neglected welfare statue of working donkeys in Ethiopia: The case of Dale district in Southern Ethiopia

B. Tanga, A. Gebremeskel
{"title":"The neglected welfare statue of working donkeys in Ethiopia: The case of Dale district in Southern Ethiopia","authors":"B. Tanga, A. Gebremeskel","doi":"10.5897/JVMAH2018.0717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A cross sectional study was conducted on A total of 246 working donkeys from October 2015 to May 2016 with the objectives of assessing the welfare problem and harness related wound in dale district of Sidama Zone. The data were collected using direct (animal-based, using the hand tool) and indirect (owners resource-based, through questionnaire survey) methods. Indirect data was collected on the working management of donkeys whereas direct data was collected through observation of behavior (emotion and energy state), body condition score, wound, lameness and other signs of diseases. The qualitative behavior assessment (QBA) was employed to assess the behavior and communication of donkeys. The overall prevalence of wound occurrence was 43.1% whereas; prevalence of lameness was 22.7%. Majority of donkeys examined for emotional and energy state by QBA showed 39.8% with high-energy state, reflecting poor behavior and communication. The common sites of wound in donkey’s were back sore, tail sore, chest wound, bit, girth and bite. From the total of 246 donkeys working, only 57 (23.1) were using improved harness. The occurrence of wounds was found to be statistically significantly associated with age (P=0.000) and use of improved harness (P=0.002). In conclusion, illiteracy and not using of improved harness contributed to the compromised welfare. Therefore, there should be massive awareness creation on animal welfare, sentient being and health management. There should be also significant endeavor at multiple stages; community, local service providers and policy level to improve the welfare statue of working donkeys in the area in particular and in the country in general. \n \n Key words: Dale District, harness, welfare problems, working donkey, wound.","PeriodicalId":17608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health","volume":"474 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5897/JVMAH2018.0717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A cross sectional study was conducted on A total of 246 working donkeys from October 2015 to May 2016 with the objectives of assessing the welfare problem and harness related wound in dale district of Sidama Zone. The data were collected using direct (animal-based, using the hand tool) and indirect (owners resource-based, through questionnaire survey) methods. Indirect data was collected on the working management of donkeys whereas direct data was collected through observation of behavior (emotion and energy state), body condition score, wound, lameness and other signs of diseases. The qualitative behavior assessment (QBA) was employed to assess the behavior and communication of donkeys. The overall prevalence of wound occurrence was 43.1% whereas; prevalence of lameness was 22.7%. Majority of donkeys examined for emotional and energy state by QBA showed 39.8% with high-energy state, reflecting poor behavior and communication. The common sites of wound in donkey’s were back sore, tail sore, chest wound, bit, girth and bite. From the total of 246 donkeys working, only 57 (23.1) were using improved harness. The occurrence of wounds was found to be statistically significantly associated with age (P=0.000) and use of improved harness (P=0.002). In conclusion, illiteracy and not using of improved harness contributed to the compromised welfare. Therefore, there should be massive awareness creation on animal welfare, sentient being and health management. There should be also significant endeavor at multiple stages; community, local service providers and policy level to improve the welfare statue of working donkeys in the area in particular and in the country in general. Key words: Dale District, harness, welfare problems, working donkey, wound.
埃塞俄比亚被忽视的驴福利雕像:以埃塞俄比亚南部戴尔地区为例
2015年10月至2016年5月,我们对246头工作驴进行了横断面研究,目的是评估Sidama区dale区的福利问题和马具相关伤口。采用直接(以动物为基础,使用手工工具)和间接(以所有者资源为基础,通过问卷调查)方法收集数据。间接收集驴的工作管理数据,直接收集驴的行为(情绪和能量状态)、身体状况评分、伤口、跛行和其他疾病迹象。采用定性行为评价法(QBA)对驴的行为和交流进行评价。伤口总发生率为43.1%;跛行发生率为22.7%。QBA对大多数驴的情绪和能量状态进行了测试,39.8%的驴处于高能状态,反映出驴的行为和沟通能力较差。驴的常见伤口部位为背部、尾部、胸部、咬伤、腰部和咬伤。在246头驴中,只有57头(23.1头)使用了改良的马具。伤口的发生与年龄(P=0.000)和使用改良的马具(P=0.002)有显著的统计学意义。总之,文盲和不使用改进的工具导致了福利的损害。因此,应该在动物福利、众生和健康管理方面进行大规模的意识创造。还应该在多个阶段作出重大努力;社区、当地服务提供者和政策层面,以改善该地区和整个国家工作驴的福利状况。关键词:河谷区;马具;福利问题;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信