Clinicians perception and assessment of risk factors for surgical site infections in small animal practice in South-West, Nigeria

O. Eyarefe, I. M. Adeyemi
{"title":"Clinicians perception and assessment of risk factors for surgical site infections in small animal practice in South-West, Nigeria","authors":"O. Eyarefe, I. M. Adeyemi","doi":"10.5897/JVMAH2019.0791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluated the prevalence of Surgical Site Infections (SSIs), the enhancing risk factors in small animal hospitals and clinics, and clinicians’ perception of SSIs in South-west, Nigeria. Ten years (2007-2017) surgical patients’ case records from four government veterinary hospitals were initially studied. Fifty-seven copies of structured pre-tested questionnaires were further administered to practice representatives in government and private small animal facilities in 6 states of South-West, Nigeria. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and Pearson Chi-square at 95% confidence intervals. One hundred and twenty-six out of 584 small animal surgical patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. Eight (6.3%) cases from the case records had SSIs. Fifty out of 57 retrieved questionnaires satisfied the inclusion criteria for analysis. Sixty-four percent of respondents had the Doctor of Veterinary Medicine (DVM) degree while 36% had additional degrees. The majority (64%) of respondents had 1 to 3 years practice experience with the rest having above 3 years. Most of the respondents (96%) had good knowledge of SSI, 78.7% usually manage SSI cases and 18% had lost patients due to SSIs. Only 48% of the practices perform surgery in designated operating rooms. The environment (94%), hands of clinicians/caregiver (80%) and patients’ skin (62%) were the main sources of SSIs in respondents’ practice. Few respondents (19.1%) administer prophylactic antibiotics for all surgeries, 6.1% discontinue within 24 h post-surgery, while 75.5% continue antibiotic therapy for 3 to 7 days post-surgery. Lack of facilities (40%) and funds (54%) prevented some clinicians from keeping up with SSIs prevention measures. There was an association between the risk factors of post-operative wound dehiscence (P=0.006), classification of the surgical procedures (P=0.032) and SSI occurrence. Although many small animal practitioners are aware of SSIs risk factors, only few adhere to prevention protocols. \n \n Key words: Surgical site infection (SSI), risk factors, small animal clinicians, perception.","PeriodicalId":17608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health","volume":"40 1","pages":"66-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5897/JVMAH2019.0791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the prevalence of Surgical Site Infections (SSIs), the enhancing risk factors in small animal hospitals and clinics, and clinicians’ perception of SSIs in South-west, Nigeria. Ten years (2007-2017) surgical patients’ case records from four government veterinary hospitals were initially studied. Fifty-seven copies of structured pre-tested questionnaires were further administered to practice representatives in government and private small animal facilities in 6 states of South-West, Nigeria. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and Pearson Chi-square at 95% confidence intervals. One hundred and twenty-six out of 584 small animal surgical patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. Eight (6.3%) cases from the case records had SSIs. Fifty out of 57 retrieved questionnaires satisfied the inclusion criteria for analysis. Sixty-four percent of respondents had the Doctor of Veterinary Medicine (DVM) degree while 36% had additional degrees. The majority (64%) of respondents had 1 to 3 years practice experience with the rest having above 3 years. Most of the respondents (96%) had good knowledge of SSI, 78.7% usually manage SSI cases and 18% had lost patients due to SSIs. Only 48% of the practices perform surgery in designated operating rooms. The environment (94%), hands of clinicians/caregiver (80%) and patients’ skin (62%) were the main sources of SSIs in respondents’ practice. Few respondents (19.1%) administer prophylactic antibiotics for all surgeries, 6.1% discontinue within 24 h post-surgery, while 75.5% continue antibiotic therapy for 3 to 7 days post-surgery. Lack of facilities (40%) and funds (54%) prevented some clinicians from keeping up with SSIs prevention measures. There was an association between the risk factors of post-operative wound dehiscence (P=0.006), classification of the surgical procedures (P=0.032) and SSI occurrence. Although many small animal practitioners are aware of SSIs risk factors, only few adhere to prevention protocols. Key words: Surgical site infection (SSI), risk factors, small animal clinicians, perception.
临床医生对尼日利亚西南部小动物手术部位感染危险因素的认识和评估
本研究评估了尼日利亚西南部小动物医院和诊所手术部位感染(ssi)的患病率、增强危险因素以及临床医生对ssi的认知。初步研究了四家政府兽医院10年(2007-2017年)外科患者病例记录。进一步向尼日利亚西南部6个州的政府和私人小动物设施的执业代表发放了57份结构化预测试问卷。数据分析采用描述性统计和皮尔逊卡方在95%置信区间。584例小动物手术患者中有126例符合纳入标准。病例记录中有8例(6.3%)存在ssi。57份回收问卷中有50份符合纳入标准进行分析。64%的受访者拥有兽医博士(DVM)学位,36%的受访者拥有额外学位。大多数(64%)受访者有1至3年执业经验,其余则有3年以上。大多数受访者(96%)对SSI有良好的了解,78.7%的人通常处理SSI病例,18%的人因SSI而失去患者。只有48%的诊所在指定的手术室进行手术。环境(94%)、临床医生/护理人员的手(80%)和患者的皮肤(62%)是受访者实践中ssi的主要来源。少数受访者(19.1%)在所有手术中都使用预防性抗生素,6.1%在术后24小时内停药,而75.5%在术后3至7天内继续使用抗生素。缺乏设施(40%)和资金(54%)使一些临床医生无法跟上ssi预防措施的步伐。术后伤口裂开的危险因素(P=0.006)、手术方式的分类(P=0.032)与SSI的发生存在相关性。虽然许多小动物从业者都意识到ssi的风险因素,但只有少数人坚持预防方案。关键词:手术部位感染,危险因素,小动物临床医生,认知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信