Exploring the Barriers to Implementing the Integrated Project Delivery Method

Q1 Chemical Engineering
Rudhab S. Buk'hail, Ruqaya S. Al-Sabah
{"title":"Exploring the Barriers to Implementing the Integrated Project Delivery Method","authors":"Rudhab S. Buk'hail,&nbsp;Ruqaya S. Al-Sabah","doi":"10.1016/j.jksues.2022.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The willingness of Kuwait’s construction industry to implement the new and emerging delivery system, the Integrated Project Delivery method (IPD), was explored in this research. As general conclusions to the barriers to IPD are already established by existing literature, this research aims to identify the specific barriers to IPD by evaluating the willingness of non-IPD teams to implement the principles of IPD. Data was collected from members engaged in multiple construction projects located in Kuwait. Statistical analyses were performed on the collected data to examine differences and similarities in their responses. A Delay Index variable revealed that ongoing Design-Bid-Build (DBB) projects are suffering a delay that amounts to half their original construction duration and that is almost double the delay incurred on Design-Build (DB) projects, which suffered a lesser delay. The data was further analyzed based on the respondents’ project delivery system, project sector, years of experience, and project party. The results indicated that the majority of the respondents working in Kuwait were willing to implement most of IPD’s principles. Astonishingly, respondents working on DBB projects were more willing to implement the principles of IPD than those working on DB projects. The respondents from both the public and private sectors were equally willing. The main contractors were found to be less willing to implement IPD than all the other project parties. Moreover, the most prominent barriers prohibiting most respondents from implementing IPD was their unwillingness to sign a contract that includes liability waivers and one that includes IPD’s organizational hierarchical structure. The findings of this research contribute to the current body of knowledge by exploring the construction industry’s willingness to implement IPD and by simultaneously identifying the specific barriers to its implementation, as well as identifying where these barriers lie.  These findings may be used as evidence by owners or industry pioneers in promoting the implementation of IPD in their respective organizations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of King Saud University, Engineering Sciences","volume":"36 8","pages":"Pages 543-551"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of King Saud University, Engineering Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1018363922000344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Chemical Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The willingness of Kuwait’s construction industry to implement the new and emerging delivery system, the Integrated Project Delivery method (IPD), was explored in this research. As general conclusions to the barriers to IPD are already established by existing literature, this research aims to identify the specific barriers to IPD by evaluating the willingness of non-IPD teams to implement the principles of IPD. Data was collected from members engaged in multiple construction projects located in Kuwait. Statistical analyses were performed on the collected data to examine differences and similarities in their responses. A Delay Index variable revealed that ongoing Design-Bid-Build (DBB) projects are suffering a delay that amounts to half their original construction duration and that is almost double the delay incurred on Design-Build (DB) projects, which suffered a lesser delay. The data was further analyzed based on the respondents’ project delivery system, project sector, years of experience, and project party. The results indicated that the majority of the respondents working in Kuwait were willing to implement most of IPD’s principles. Astonishingly, respondents working on DBB projects were more willing to implement the principles of IPD than those working on DB projects. The respondents from both the public and private sectors were equally willing. The main contractors were found to be less willing to implement IPD than all the other project parties. Moreover, the most prominent barriers prohibiting most respondents from implementing IPD was their unwillingness to sign a contract that includes liability waivers and one that includes IPD’s organizational hierarchical structure. The findings of this research contribute to the current body of knowledge by exploring the construction industry’s willingness to implement IPD and by simultaneously identifying the specific barriers to its implementation, as well as identifying where these barriers lie.  These findings may be used as evidence by owners or industry pioneers in promoting the implementation of IPD in their respective organizations.
探索实施一体化项目交付方法的障碍
本研究探讨了科威特建筑行业实施新兴交付系统的意愿,即综合项目交付方法(IPD)。由于现有文献已经对IPD障碍做出了一般性结论,本研究旨在通过评估非IPD团队实施IPD原则的意愿来识别IPD的具体障碍。数据是从在科威特从事多个建筑项目的成员那里收集的。对收集的数据进行统计分析,以检查他们的回答的差异和相似之处。一项延迟指数变量显示,正在进行的设计-投标-建造(DBB)项目的延迟相当于其原始施工时间的一半,几乎是设计-建造(DB)项目延迟的两倍,后者的延迟较小。根据受访者的项目交付体系、项目部门、经验年数和项目方,进一步分析了数据。结果表明,在科威特工作的大多数答复者愿意执行IPD的大部分原则。令人惊讶的是,从事DBB项目的受访者比从事DB项目的受访者更愿意实施IPD原则。公营和私营机构的受访者都表示愿意。发现主要承包商比所有其他项目当事方更不愿意执行IPD。此外,大多数受访者实施IPD的最主要障碍是他们不愿意签署包括责任豁免和包括IPD组织等级结构的合同。这项研究的结果通过探索建筑行业实施IPD的意愿,同时确定实施IPD的具体障碍,以及确定这些障碍所在,为当前的知识体系做出了贡献。这些发现可能被业主或行业先驱用作在各自组织中促进IPD实施的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of King Saud University, Engineering Sciences
Journal of King Saud University, Engineering Sciences Chemical Engineering-Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences (JKSUES) is a peer-reviewed journal published quarterly. It is hosted and published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. JKSUES is devoted to a wide range of sub-fields in the Engineering Sciences and JKSUES welcome articles of interdisciplinary nature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信