Comparison of Punching Shear Design in Finland According to the Current and the Former Method

IF 0.7 Q4 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Tuomas M. S. Lehtonen, Matias Hirvikoski, Julius Rajamäki
{"title":"Comparison of Punching Shear Design in Finland According to the Current and the Former Method","authors":"Tuomas M. S. Lehtonen, Matias Hirvikoski, Julius Rajamäki","doi":"10.2478/ncr-2019-0092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the beginning of 2017 the design method for punching shear in Finland was changed. The method presented in Eurocode 2 was adopted with some nationally determined parameters and rules. During 2016 and 2017 computational analyses were conducted to compare the previous national design method and the new one. Comparison setups were created in which different parameters were varied. The results were presented the predicted punching resistances differ differences are significant and can be almost 60% in some cases.","PeriodicalId":42762,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Concrete Research","volume":"4 1","pages":"131 - 144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Concrete Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ncr-2019-0092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In the beginning of 2017 the design method for punching shear in Finland was changed. The method presented in Eurocode 2 was adopted with some nationally determined parameters and rules. During 2016 and 2017 computational analyses were conducted to compare the previous national design method and the new one. Comparison setups were created in which different parameters were varied. The results were presented the predicted punching resistances differ differences are significant and can be almost 60% in some cases.
芬兰冲孔剪切设计与现有方法的比较
2017年初,芬兰改变了冲剪设计方法。采用欧洲规范2中提出的方法,并采用一些国家确定的参数和规则。在2016年和2017年进行了计算分析,比较了以前的国家设计方法和新的设计方法。创建了不同参数的比较设置。结果表明,预测的冲孔阻力差异很大,在某些情况下几乎可以达到60%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nordic Concrete Research
Nordic Concrete Research CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-
自引率
20.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信