English textbooks evaluation for the seventh grade

Diba Ratu Vidari Jannah, Rr. Hasti Robiasih
{"title":"English textbooks evaluation for the seventh grade","authors":"Diba Ratu Vidari Jannah, Rr. Hasti Robiasih","doi":"10.36597/jelp.v2i1.3749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study are to: (1) find out whether the English textbooks of Mandiri and Solatif for seventh grade have fulfilled the criteria of good textbook, (2) reveal the suitability of the two textbooks with the 2013 Curriculum. This research was conducted using evaluation research. The design was employed to obtain information about the conformity between the basic competences in syllabus of 2013 Curriculum with the materials in the English textbooks and also between the criteria of a good textbook by Cunningsworth with the English textbooks. In this study, two English textbooks; Mandiri and Solatif for seventh grade of junior high school were taken to be analyzed. The results showed that Solatif meets three criteria of a good textbook by Cunningsworth. They are aim and approaches, topics, and methodology. It is partly suitable with four categories: design and organization, language content, skills, and political consideration. However it fails to meet one criterion, which is teacher’s book. Mandiri meets none of the criteria of a good textbook by Cunningsworth. It is partly suitable in seven criteria which are aims and approaches, design and organization, language content, skills, topics, methodology, and political consideration. It fails to meet one criterion; teacher’s book. Based on the data got from the conformity of Solatif with the 2013 Curriculum, it can be summarized that the materials in Solatif covers eight KDs for the seventh grade of junior high school, meaning that it accommodates all what is needed by the students for seventh grade of junior high school. Mandiri. It covers seven KDs for the seventh grade of junior high school. Unfortunately, it does not cover one of the last KD.","PeriodicalId":32887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36597/jelp.v2i1.3749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The objective of this study are to: (1) find out whether the English textbooks of Mandiri and Solatif for seventh grade have fulfilled the criteria of good textbook, (2) reveal the suitability of the two textbooks with the 2013 Curriculum. This research was conducted using evaluation research. The design was employed to obtain information about the conformity between the basic competences in syllabus of 2013 Curriculum with the materials in the English textbooks and also between the criteria of a good textbook by Cunningsworth with the English textbooks. In this study, two English textbooks; Mandiri and Solatif for seventh grade of junior high school were taken to be analyzed. The results showed that Solatif meets three criteria of a good textbook by Cunningsworth. They are aim and approaches, topics, and methodology. It is partly suitable with four categories: design and organization, language content, skills, and political consideration. However it fails to meet one criterion, which is teacher’s book. Mandiri meets none of the criteria of a good textbook by Cunningsworth. It is partly suitable in seven criteria which are aims and approaches, design and organization, language content, skills, topics, methodology, and political consideration. It fails to meet one criterion; teacher’s book. Based on the data got from the conformity of Solatif with the 2013 Curriculum, it can be summarized that the materials in Solatif covers eight KDs for the seventh grade of junior high school, meaning that it accommodates all what is needed by the students for seventh grade of junior high school. Mandiri. It covers seven KDs for the seventh grade of junior high school. Unfortunately, it does not cover one of the last KD.
七年级英语教材评价
本研究的目的是:(1)了解Mandiri和Solatif七年级英语教材是否达到了优秀教材的标准,(2)揭示这两本教材与2013年课程的适用性。本研究采用评价研究方法进行。本设计旨在了解2013年课程大纲中的基本能力与英语教材中的材料之间的一致性,以及Cunningsworth的好教材的标准与英语教材之间的一致性。本研究选取了两本英语教材;选取初中七年级的Mandiri和Solatif进行分析。结果表明,《Solatif》符合坎宁斯沃思编写的优秀教科书的三个标准。它们是目标和方法、主题和方法论。它部分适用于四个类别:设计和组织、语言内容、技能和政治考虑。然而,它没有达到一个标准,那就是教师的书。《曼迪丽》不符合坎宁斯沃斯所写的一本好教科书的任何标准。它在目标和方法、设计和组织、语言内容、技能、主题、方法和政治考虑这七个标准中部分适用。它不符合一个标准;老师的书。根据Solatif与2013年课程的一致性数据,可以总结出Solatif的材料涵盖了初中七年级的八个KDs,这意味着它容纳了初中七年级学生所需要的所有内容。Mandiri。它涵盖了初中七年级的七个学科。不幸的是,它不包括最后一个KD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信