Methodology and methods: the difference between tools and interpretive frameworks and what this means in practice

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY
Morten Brænder
{"title":"Methodology and methods: the difference between tools and interpretive frameworks and what this means in practice","authors":"Morten Brænder","doi":"10.7146/politica.v54i4.134838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is two-fold. First, it introduces the distinction between methods and methodology. Second, it briefly describes the three methodologies prevailing within the social sciences: the variance-oriented, the process-oriented and the meaning-oriented methodology. These are illustrated with a recurring example. Methods are tools. They may be qualitative or quantitative. Methodologies are interpretive frameworks, best understood as languages. As you cannot expect to be understood in another language if you translate word by word, you cannot transfer the underlying logic from one methodology to another. Notably, this does not imply that translations are impossible, but that it is extremely difficult to translate without recognizing linguistic or – as in this case – methodological differences.","PeriodicalId":40761,"journal":{"name":"Filosofia Politica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofia Politica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v54i4.134838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this article is two-fold. First, it introduces the distinction between methods and methodology. Second, it briefly describes the three methodologies prevailing within the social sciences: the variance-oriented, the process-oriented and the meaning-oriented methodology. These are illustrated with a recurring example. Methods are tools. They may be qualitative or quantitative. Methodologies are interpretive frameworks, best understood as languages. As you cannot expect to be understood in another language if you translate word by word, you cannot transfer the underlying logic from one methodology to another. Notably, this does not imply that translations are impossible, but that it is extremely difficult to translate without recognizing linguistic or – as in this case – methodological differences.
方法论和方法:工具和解释框架之间的差异及其在实践中的意义
本文的目的有两个。首先,介绍了方法和方法论的区别。其次,简要介绍了社会科学中流行的三种方法论:方差导向、过程导向和意义导向方法论。用一个反复出现的例子来说明这些问题。方法是工具。它们可能是定性的,也可能是定量的。方法学是解释性框架,最好理解为语言。由于如果逐字翻译,就不能指望用另一种语言理解,因此无法将基础逻辑从一种方法转移到另一种方法。值得注意的是,这并不意味着翻译是不可能的,但如果不认识到语言上的差异,或者——就像在这种情况下——方法上的差异,翻译是极其困难的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Filosofia Politica
Filosofia Politica PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信