Secondary prevention: principles and good practice/screening tests

D. Elliman
{"title":"Secondary prevention: principles and good practice/screening tests","authors":"D. Elliman","doi":"10.1093/MED/9780198788850.003.0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Screening can be a very important means to reduce the morbidity and mortality of conditions that cannot currently be prevented. However, it also has the capacity to do harm by incorrectly labelling people as having a condition, when in reality they do not, thus causing anxiety and sometimes resulting in unnecessary interventions. The UK National Screening Committee recommends national policy on screening on the basis of the evidence of the overall effects of a potential programme and its cost-effectiveness. Once a programme is introduced, it should be carefully monitored to ensure that it lives up to expectations, coverage is appropriately high, the expected outcomes are delivered, and that it does not increase inequality. More detail can be found on the UK National Screening Committee website.","PeriodicalId":19711,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Medicine Online","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Medicine Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780198788850.003.0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Screening can be a very important means to reduce the morbidity and mortality of conditions that cannot currently be prevented. However, it also has the capacity to do harm by incorrectly labelling people as having a condition, when in reality they do not, thus causing anxiety and sometimes resulting in unnecessary interventions. The UK National Screening Committee recommends national policy on screening on the basis of the evidence of the overall effects of a potential programme and its cost-effectiveness. Once a programme is introduced, it should be carefully monitored to ensure that it lives up to expectations, coverage is appropriately high, the expected outcomes are delivered, and that it does not increase inequality. More detail can be found on the UK National Screening Committee website.
二级预防:原则和良好做法/筛选试验
筛查是降低目前无法预防的疾病的发病率和死亡率的一种非常重要的手段。然而,它也有可能造成伤害,因为它错误地将人们贴上患有某种疾病的标签,而实际上他们并没有,从而引起焦虑,有时还会导致不必要的干预。联合王国国家筛查委员会根据潜在方案的总体效果及其成本效益的证据,建议国家筛查政策。一旦实施了一项计划,就应该对其进行仔细监测,以确保其符合预期,覆盖率适当高,实现预期成果,并且不会加剧不平等。更多的细节可以在英国国家审查委员会的网站上找到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信