Implementation in nursing and midwifery. A scoping review / Implementationsprojekte in der Pflege und Hebammenarbeit. Scoping review

C. Loytved, Gabriele Hasenberg, K. Brendel, Cornelia Bothe-Moser, R. Eggenschwiler, D. Eigenmann, P. Graf, Kristin Hammer, Regula Hauser, Katrin Oberndörfer, Anja Pfister-Stoppa, Elisabeth Spiegel-Hefel, Andrea Stiefel
{"title":"Implementation in nursing and midwifery. A scoping review / Implementationsprojekte in der Pflege und Hebammenarbeit. Scoping review","authors":"C. Loytved, Gabriele Hasenberg, K. Brendel, Cornelia Bothe-Moser, R. Eggenschwiler, D. Eigenmann, P. Graf, Kristin Hammer, Regula Hauser, Katrin Oberndörfer, Anja Pfister-Stoppa, Elisabeth Spiegel-Hefel, Andrea Stiefel","doi":"10.1515/ijhp-2017-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Evidence-based expertise in nursing and midwifery is growing but is not automatically turned into practice. The importance of implementation research is therefore increasing. International research results on factors facilitating implementation have not yet been sufficiently presented. Objective This scoping review will explore the findings on successful preparation, realisation and maintenance of interventions in nursing and midwifery. Method Based on an existing systematic approach, relevant data bases were accessed to identify original studies relating to implementation research in nursing and midwifery. The process of study selection and the characteristics of the included studies were charted. Findings In the four reviews and 38 studies which met the inclusion criteria, various factors leading to successful implementation are identified. Based on the included studies, four facilitating factors can be pinpointed: (1) workplace culture (16 entries), (2) leadership culture (28 entries), (3) resources (4 entries), and (4) training (22 entries). Depending on the specific phase of the implementation process (preparation, realisation, or maintenance), these factors will vary in importance. Conclusion This scoping review provides an orientation for the field of implementation research and it maps the design, themes and results of the studies included. It should be noted that few studies take into consideration the relevant theories, as well as the influence that the researchers and the target group may have on the implementation process, or provide an exact description of the setting in which the implementation takes place.","PeriodicalId":91706,"journal":{"name":"International journal of health professions","volume":"422 1","pages":"122 - 136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of health professions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ijhp-2017-0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Evidence-based expertise in nursing and midwifery is growing but is not automatically turned into practice. The importance of implementation research is therefore increasing. International research results on factors facilitating implementation have not yet been sufficiently presented. Objective This scoping review will explore the findings on successful preparation, realisation and maintenance of interventions in nursing and midwifery. Method Based on an existing systematic approach, relevant data bases were accessed to identify original studies relating to implementation research in nursing and midwifery. The process of study selection and the characteristics of the included studies were charted. Findings In the four reviews and 38 studies which met the inclusion criteria, various factors leading to successful implementation are identified. Based on the included studies, four facilitating factors can be pinpointed: (1) workplace culture (16 entries), (2) leadership culture (28 entries), (3) resources (4 entries), and (4) training (22 entries). Depending on the specific phase of the implementation process (preparation, realisation, or maintenance), these factors will vary in importance. Conclusion This scoping review provides an orientation for the field of implementation research and it maps the design, themes and results of the studies included. It should be noted that few studies take into consideration the relevant theories, as well as the influence that the researchers and the target group may have on the implementation process, or provide an exact description of the setting in which the implementation takes place.
护理和助产的实施。一项范围审查/实施项目将在联合国和联合国大会上进行。范围审查
背景护理和助产学的循证专业知识正在增长,但不会自动转化为实践。因此,实施研究的重要性日益增加。关于促进执行的因素的国际研究结果尚未充分提出。目的本综述将探讨护理和助产干预措施的成功准备、实现和维持的研究结果。方法在现有系统方法的基础上,查阅相关数据库,找出与护理与助产学实施研究相关的原始研究。研究选择的过程和纳入研究的特征被绘制成图表。在四项综述和38项符合纳入标准的研究中,确定了导致成功实施的各种因素。根据纳入的研究,可以确定四个促进因素:(1)职场文化(16条),(2)领导文化(28条),(3)资源(4条),(4)培训(22条)。根据实施过程的具体阶段(准备、实现或维护),这些因素的重要性各不相同。本综述为实施研究领域提供了一个方向,并描绘了所纳入研究的设计、主题和结果。应该指出的是,很少有研究考虑到相关理论,以及研究人员和目标群体对实施过程可能产生的影响,或者对实施发生的环境进行准确描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信