Hegemony of two avian species: Black kites and Cattle egrets on two distant landfills during COVID-19 pandemic in Gujranwala, Pakistan

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Zunaira Noreen
{"title":"Hegemony of two avian species: Black kites and Cattle egrets on two distant landfills during COVID-19 pandemic in Gujranwala, Pakistan","authors":"Zunaira Noreen","doi":"10.19045/BSPAB.2022-110002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pandemic of COVID -19 has brought many changes to wildlife globally positively or negatively. During lock downs the abundance of many wild species has increased due to decease in human disturbance in area. This study is designed to compare two landfills situated 22 km apart in the Gujranwala, Punjab in terms of avifauna diversity, abundance and foraging behavior during COVID-19 pandemic. The field observations using the total count method of population census revealed the abundance of contrasting avian species at both sites with a very low values of the diversity index (H= 1.146 Chianwali & H=1.697 Gondalawala ) and species evenness (E= 0.423 Chianwali & E= 0.587 Gondalawala). A large variation in bird’s population was recorded at both landfills, i.e. N > 17,300 at one landfill (Chianwali) and N> 26,200 at the other (Gondalawala). Time dependent variation in population was also observed. Cattle egret was dominant species (~75% of population) at the Chianwali landfill site while the Black kite (~55% of population) was the dominant species at Gondalawala landfill. House crow was the second dominant species at both sites. Birds were grouped into categories based on ecological behaviors such as dominance, opportunists, insectivory etc. The study finds that each landfill has its own specific character depending upon the geographical location, accessibility of birds to landfills, and management practices such as presence of boundary wall and artificial lights. Moreover, it also finds that COVID -19 lockdown provided an opportunity to wild avian species to exploit human rehabilitated areas abundantly where there presence was very few because of dominance of human beings and their activities.","PeriodicalId":19826,"journal":{"name":"Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19045/BSPAB.2022-110002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pandemic of COVID -19 has brought many changes to wildlife globally positively or negatively. During lock downs the abundance of many wild species has increased due to decease in human disturbance in area. This study is designed to compare two landfills situated 22 km apart in the Gujranwala, Punjab in terms of avifauna diversity, abundance and foraging behavior during COVID-19 pandemic. The field observations using the total count method of population census revealed the abundance of contrasting avian species at both sites with a very low values of the diversity index (H= 1.146 Chianwali & H=1.697 Gondalawala ) and species evenness (E= 0.423 Chianwali & E= 0.587 Gondalawala). A large variation in bird’s population was recorded at both landfills, i.e. N > 17,300 at one landfill (Chianwali) and N> 26,200 at the other (Gondalawala). Time dependent variation in population was also observed. Cattle egret was dominant species (~75% of population) at the Chianwali landfill site while the Black kite (~55% of population) was the dominant species at Gondalawala landfill. House crow was the second dominant species at both sites. Birds were grouped into categories based on ecological behaviors such as dominance, opportunists, insectivory etc. The study finds that each landfill has its own specific character depending upon the geographical location, accessibility of birds to landfills, and management practices such as presence of boundary wall and artificial lights. Moreover, it also finds that COVID -19 lockdown provided an opportunity to wild avian species to exploit human rehabilitated areas abundantly where there presence was very few because of dominance of human beings and their activities.
2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,巴基斯坦古吉兰瓦拉两个遥远的垃圾填埋场上两种鸟类的霸权:黑鸢和牛白鹭
2019冠状病毒病大流行给全球野生动物带来了许多积极或消极的变化。在封禁期间,由于该地区人为干扰的减少,许多野生物种的丰度有所增加。本研究旨在比较旁遮普古杰兰瓦拉相隔22公里的两个垃圾填埋场在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的鸟类多样性、丰度和觅食行为。种群普查总计数法的野外观测结果显示,两个地点的鸟类多样性指数(H= 1.146 Chianwali和H=1.697 Gondalawala)和物种均匀度(E= 0.423 Chianwali和E= 0.587 Gondalawala)均很低。两个填埋场的鸟类种群差异较大,其中Chianwali的N> 17,300, Gondalawala的N> 26,200。还观察到种群的时间依赖性变化。Chianwali垃圾场的优势种为牛白鹭(约占种群的75%),Gondalawala垃圾场的优势种为黑鸢(约占种群的55%)。家鸦在两个地点均为第二优势种。根据生态行为将鸟类分为优势型、机会型、食虫型等。研究发现,每个垃圾填埋场都有自己的特点,这取决于地理位置、鸟类到达垃圾填埋场的可及性,以及管理实践,如边界墙和人工照明的存在。此外,该研究还发现,新冠肺炎封锁为野生鸟类提供了大量利用人类恢复地区的机会,这些地区由于人类和人类活动的主导地位而很少存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
9-18 weeks
期刊介绍: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira – PAB – is issued monthly by Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária – EMBRAPA, affiliated to Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply. PAB publishes original scientific-technological articles on Plant Physiology, Plant Pathology, Crop Science, Genetics, Soil Science, Food Technology and Animal Science. Its abbreviated title is Pesq. agropec. bras., and it should be used in bibliographies, footnotes, references and bibliographic strips.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信