A comparative study of voice outcomes and complication rates in patients undergoing injection laryngoplasty performed under local versus general anaesthesia: an Adelaide voice specialist's experience

D. Chandran, Charmaine Woods, Shahid Ullah, Eng H. Ooi, T. Athanasiadis
{"title":"A comparative study of voice outcomes and complication rates in patients undergoing injection laryngoplasty performed under local versus general anaesthesia: an Adelaide voice specialist's experience","authors":"D. Chandran, Charmaine Woods, Shahid Ullah, Eng H. Ooi, T. Athanasiadis","doi":"10.1017/S0022215116009221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: To compare clinical outcomes and complication rates in patients undergoing injection laryngoplasty performed under local versus general anaesthesia. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent injection laryngoplasty performed by a single laryngologist in a tertiary Australian laryngology centre, between February 2013 and December 2014. Patient demographics, anaesthetic modality and complications were recorded. Voice Handicap Index 10 and the Grade, Breathiness, Roughness, Asthenia, Strain scale were evaluated. Results: Thirty-four laryngoplasties were performed under general anaesthesia and 41 under local anaesthesia, with mean patient ages of 59.5 and 68.8 years, respectively. Voice Handicap Index 10 scores were significantly improved post-injection (p < 0.001), with no significant difference between general anaesthesia and local anaesthesia (p > 0.05). All aspects of the Grade, Breathiness, Roughness, Asthenia, Strain scale showed significant improvement post-injection, except asthenia. There were seven (9.3 per cent) minor complications (five in the general anaesthesia group, two in the local anaesthesia group), all managed conservatively. Conclusion: Injection laryngoplasties performed under general anaesthesia and local anaesthesia offer similar voice outcomes, with comparable complication rates. Hence, development of a management algorithm for injection laryngoplasties performed under local anaesthesia is recommended.","PeriodicalId":22781,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Laryngology &#x0026; Otology","volume":"144 1","pages":"S41 - S46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Laryngology &#x0026; Otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215116009221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Abstract Objective: To compare clinical outcomes and complication rates in patients undergoing injection laryngoplasty performed under local versus general anaesthesia. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent injection laryngoplasty performed by a single laryngologist in a tertiary Australian laryngology centre, between February 2013 and December 2014. Patient demographics, anaesthetic modality and complications were recorded. Voice Handicap Index 10 and the Grade, Breathiness, Roughness, Asthenia, Strain scale were evaluated. Results: Thirty-four laryngoplasties were performed under general anaesthesia and 41 under local anaesthesia, with mean patient ages of 59.5 and 68.8 years, respectively. Voice Handicap Index 10 scores were significantly improved post-injection (p < 0.001), with no significant difference between general anaesthesia and local anaesthesia (p > 0.05). All aspects of the Grade, Breathiness, Roughness, Asthenia, Strain scale showed significant improvement post-injection, except asthenia. There were seven (9.3 per cent) minor complications (five in the general anaesthesia group, two in the local anaesthesia group), all managed conservatively. Conclusion: Injection laryngoplasties performed under general anaesthesia and local anaesthesia offer similar voice outcomes, with comparable complication rates. Hence, development of a management algorithm for injection laryngoplasties performed under local anaesthesia is recommended.
阿德莱德语音专家的经验:在局部麻醉和全身麻醉下进行注射喉部成形术患者的语音结果和并发症发生率的比较研究
摘要目的:比较局部麻醉和全身麻醉下注射喉部成形术患者的临床结果和并发症发生率。方法:回顾性分析2013年2月至2014年12月在澳大利亚一家三级喉科中心由一位喉科医生进行注射喉成形术的患者。记录患者人口统计、麻醉方式和并发症。对声障指数10及声障等级、呼吸度、粗糙度、虚弱度、应变度进行评价。结果:全麻下喉成形术34例,局部麻醉下喉成形术41例,平均年龄59.5岁,平均年龄68.8岁。注射后语音障碍指数10评分显著提高(p < 0.001),全麻与局麻无显著差异(p > 0.05)。注射后,除乏力外,品级、呼吸、粗糙度、乏力、应变等指标均有显著改善。有7例(9.3%)轻微并发症(全麻组5例,局部麻醉组2例),均采用保守治疗。结论:在全身麻醉和局部麻醉下进行的注射喉成形术可提供相似的语音结果,并发症发生率相当。因此,建议开发一种局部麻醉下进行注射喉部成形术的管理算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信