Comparison of surgical versus endovascular occlusion models in pig femoral arteries.

M. Engelmann, M. Shimizu, J. Pelisek, A. Fuchs, A. Golda, C. Mekkaoui, P. Fraunberger, P. Rolland, S. Nikol
{"title":"Comparison of surgical versus endovascular occlusion models in pig femoral arteries.","authors":"M. Engelmann, M. Shimizu, J. Pelisek, A. Fuchs, A. Golda, C. Mekkaoui, P. Fraunberger, P. Rolland, S. Nikol","doi":"10.1583/1545-1550(2004)011<0071:COSVEO>2.0.CO;2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nTo compare an endovascular technique with a well established surgical approach to achieve long-term occlusions of large porcine arteries while preserving the integrity of periarterial tissue.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe femoral arteries in 11 pigs were occluded using surgical techniques on one side and blinded stent-grafts in the contralateral vessel. Feasibility, safety, primary and long-term success, and the extent of vascularization were determined over a 3-month period by conventional angiography and histological analysis. A subgroup of animals (n=5) was treated with a locally administered plasmid coding for vascular endothelial growth factor (pVEGF165) to compare both occlusion techniques under conditions of collateral growth induction.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe primary and long-term success rates for both occlusion models were 100%. Surgical occlusion of arteries resulted in a significant amount of scar dehiscence and local groin infection compared to the endograft-occluded side. There was no significant difference in capillary densities and collateralization of periarterial areas in a comparison of the occlusion technique: the cross-sectional area of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) was 300 +/- 24 mm2 for endovascular occlusion versus 320 +/- 23 mm2 for surgical occlusion (p=0.559). In the profunda femoris artery, respective values were 418 +/- 35 and 448 +/- 18 mm2 (p=0.474). The local delivery of pVEGF165 resulted in a significant increase in collateral growth in both occlusion models with comparable neovascularization: cross-sectional SFA area increased from 310 +/- 16 to 428 +/- 13 mm2 (p<0.0001); in the PFA, the area increased from 422 +/- 19 to 658 +/- 49 mm2 (p<0.0001).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nEndovascular arterial occlusions using blinded stent-grafts allow easy and safe creation of long-term occlusions. Previously described collateralization following surgical occlusions was not observed, indicating that those collaterals may be associated with wound healing rather than ischemia. The occlusion of arteries using blinded stent-grafts in pigs may therefore be an appropriate model for assessing the effects of angiogenic factors in vivo.","PeriodicalId":60152,"journal":{"name":"血管与腔内血管外科杂志","volume":"65 1","pages":"71-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"血管与腔内血管外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1583/1545-1550(2004)011<0071:COSVEO>2.0.CO;2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

PURPOSE To compare an endovascular technique with a well established surgical approach to achieve long-term occlusions of large porcine arteries while preserving the integrity of periarterial tissue. METHODS The femoral arteries in 11 pigs were occluded using surgical techniques on one side and blinded stent-grafts in the contralateral vessel. Feasibility, safety, primary and long-term success, and the extent of vascularization were determined over a 3-month period by conventional angiography and histological analysis. A subgroup of animals (n=5) was treated with a locally administered plasmid coding for vascular endothelial growth factor (pVEGF165) to compare both occlusion techniques under conditions of collateral growth induction. RESULTS The primary and long-term success rates for both occlusion models were 100%. Surgical occlusion of arteries resulted in a significant amount of scar dehiscence and local groin infection compared to the endograft-occluded side. There was no significant difference in capillary densities and collateralization of periarterial areas in a comparison of the occlusion technique: the cross-sectional area of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) was 300 +/- 24 mm2 for endovascular occlusion versus 320 +/- 23 mm2 for surgical occlusion (p=0.559). In the profunda femoris artery, respective values were 418 +/- 35 and 448 +/- 18 mm2 (p=0.474). The local delivery of pVEGF165 resulted in a significant increase in collateral growth in both occlusion models with comparable neovascularization: cross-sectional SFA area increased from 310 +/- 16 to 428 +/- 13 mm2 (p<0.0001); in the PFA, the area increased from 422 +/- 19 to 658 +/- 49 mm2 (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Endovascular arterial occlusions using blinded stent-grafts allow easy and safe creation of long-term occlusions. Previously described collateralization following surgical occlusions was not observed, indicating that those collaterals may be associated with wound healing rather than ischemia. The occlusion of arteries using blinded stent-grafts in pigs may therefore be an appropriate model for assessing the effects of angiogenic factors in vivo.
猪股动脉手术与血管内闭塞模型的比较。
目的比较血管内技术与成熟的外科手术方法在保持动脉周围组织完整性的同时实现猪大动脉的长期闭塞。方法对11头猪进行单侧股动脉闭塞术和对侧盲目支架移植。在3个月的时间里,通过常规血管造影和组织学分析来确定可行性、安全性、初步和长期成功以及血管化程度。一组动物(n=5)接受局部给药的血管内皮生长因子编码质粒(pVEGF165)治疗,比较两种闭塞技术在侧支生长诱导条件下的差异。结果两种牙合模型的初、远期成功率均为100%。手术闭塞的动脉导致瘢痕开裂和局部腹股沟感染的显著量相比,内移植物闭塞的一侧。在闭塞技术的比较中,毛细血管密度和动脉周围区域的侧支无显著差异:血管内闭塞股浅动脉(SFA)的横截面积为300 +/- 24 mm2,手术闭塞为320 +/- 23 mm2 (p=0.559)。股深动脉分别为418 +/- 35和448 +/- 18 mm2 (p=0.474)。pVEGF165的局部递送导致两种具有相似新生血管的闭塞模型的侧枝生长显著增加:横截SFA面积从310 +/- 16增加到428 +/- 13 mm2 (p<0.0001);在PFA中,面积从422 +/- 19增加到658 +/- 49 mm2 (p<0.0001)。结论采用盲法支架植入血管动脉闭塞术可以方便、安全地建立长期闭塞。先前描述的手术闭塞后侧枝未被观察到,这表明这些侧枝可能与伤口愈合有关,而不是与缺血有关。因此,在猪体内使用盲法支架移植的动脉闭塞可能是评估血管生成因子在体内影响的合适模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
947
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信