Comparing Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms for Ambulance Allocation: An Experimental Simulation Study

Magnus Eide Schjølberg, Nicklas Paus Bekkevold, Xavier Sánchez-Díaz, O. Mengshoel
{"title":"Comparing Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms for Ambulance Allocation: An Experimental Simulation Study","authors":"Magnus Eide Schjølberg, Nicklas Paus Bekkevold, Xavier Sánchez-Díaz, O. Mengshoel","doi":"10.1145/3583131.3590345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The optimization of Emergency Medical Services is a central issue in modern healthcare systems. With this in focus, we study a data set containing medical emergencies for the years 2015--2019 from Oslo and Akershus, Norway. By developing a discrete trace-based simulation model based on the data set, we compute average response times that are used to optimize ambulance allocations to stations in the region. We study several metaheuristics, specifically genetic, stochastic local search, and memetic algorithms. These metaheuristics are tested using the simulation to optimize ambulance allocations, considering response times. The algorithms are compared against each other and a set of baseline allocation models over different time periods. The main results of our experimental simulation study are that: (i) the metaheuristics generally outperform the simpler baselines, (ii) the best-performing metaheuristic is the genetic algorithm, and (iii) the performance difference between the metaheuristics and the simpler baselines increases in situations with high demand on ambulances. Finally, we present suggestions for future work that may help to further improve upon the current state-of-the-art.","PeriodicalId":89841,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3583131.3590345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The optimization of Emergency Medical Services is a central issue in modern healthcare systems. With this in focus, we study a data set containing medical emergencies for the years 2015--2019 from Oslo and Akershus, Norway. By developing a discrete trace-based simulation model based on the data set, we compute average response times that are used to optimize ambulance allocations to stations in the region. We study several metaheuristics, specifically genetic, stochastic local search, and memetic algorithms. These metaheuristics are tested using the simulation to optimize ambulance allocations, considering response times. The algorithms are compared against each other and a set of baseline allocation models over different time periods. The main results of our experimental simulation study are that: (i) the metaheuristics generally outperform the simpler baselines, (ii) the best-performing metaheuristic is the genetic algorithm, and (iii) the performance difference between the metaheuristics and the simpler baselines increases in situations with high demand on ambulances. Finally, we present suggestions for future work that may help to further improve upon the current state-of-the-art.
比较救护车分配的元启发式优化算法:一个实验模拟研究
紧急医疗服务的优化是现代医疗体系的核心问题。以此为重点,我们研究了挪威奥斯陆和阿克斯胡斯2015- 2019年医疗紧急情况的数据集。通过开发基于数据集的离散跟踪模拟模型,我们计算了用于优化救护车分配到该地区站点的平均响应时间。我们研究了几种元启发式算法,特别是遗传算法、随机局部搜索算法和模因算法。这些元启发式测试使用模拟优化救护车分配,考虑到响应时间。这些算法相互比较,并与不同时期的一组基线分配模型进行比较。我们的实验模拟研究的主要结果是:(i)元启发式通常优于简单基线,(ii)表现最好的元启发式是遗传算法,以及(iii)在救护车高需求的情况下,元启发式与简单基线之间的性能差异增加。最后,我们提出了对未来工作的建议,这些建议可能有助于进一步改进当前的最新技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书