Effect of different bonding techniques on the bond strength of two different fiber posts

Kanşad Pala, S. Demirbuğa, H. Gümüş, S. Arslan, Y. Zorba
{"title":"Effect of different bonding techniques on the bond strength of two different fiber posts","authors":"Kanşad Pala, S. Demirbuğa, H. Gümüş, S. Arslan, Y. Zorba","doi":"10.4103/2321-4619.129019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of three different bonding techniques on the bond strength of two different fiber posts to root dentin with push out test. Materials and Methods: A total of 30 extracted teeth were sectioned at the cement-enamel junction using a diamond disc under water-coolant to obtain 18 mm root length. All roots were treated endodontically and filled with sealer and Gutta-percha points. The roots were randomly divided into two groups according to chosen post systems (Rebilda DC [VOCO, Cuxhaven, Germany] or UniCore [Ultradent, South Jordan, UT]). Following preparation specimens were randomly divided into three subgroups of 3 teeth each. Luting of the posts were completed with Rebilda DC (self-etch); BisCem (self-adhesive, Bisco, Schaumburg, IL) Duo-Link (etch and rinse Bisco). Specimens were transversally sectioned into 2 ± 0.05 mm thick discs and push-out test was performed. The data was analyzed statistically by using three-way ANOVA and Tukey tests. Results: The bond strengths between fiber posts and root dentin were affected by type of resin cement and post ( P < 0.05). Push out bond strengths of Rebilda groups was lower than UniCore groups ( P < 0.05). Push out bond strength of DuoLink and Rebilda DC cement groups were higher than BisCem groups. There were no statistically differences between root region. Conclusion: It can be concluded that, bond strength between fiber post and root dentin affected by the using of different post and cement types. Self-adhesion techniques were showed lower bond strength than both self-etch and etch and rinse techniques","PeriodicalId":17076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Restorative Dentistry","volume":"18 1","pages":"32 - 36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-4619.129019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of three different bonding techniques on the bond strength of two different fiber posts to root dentin with push out test. Materials and Methods: A total of 30 extracted teeth were sectioned at the cement-enamel junction using a diamond disc under water-coolant to obtain 18 mm root length. All roots were treated endodontically and filled with sealer and Gutta-percha points. The roots were randomly divided into two groups according to chosen post systems (Rebilda DC [VOCO, Cuxhaven, Germany] or UniCore [Ultradent, South Jordan, UT]). Following preparation specimens were randomly divided into three subgroups of 3 teeth each. Luting of the posts were completed with Rebilda DC (self-etch); BisCem (self-adhesive, Bisco, Schaumburg, IL) Duo-Link (etch and rinse Bisco). Specimens were transversally sectioned into 2 ± 0.05 mm thick discs and push-out test was performed. The data was analyzed statistically by using three-way ANOVA and Tukey tests. Results: The bond strengths between fiber posts and root dentin were affected by type of resin cement and post ( P < 0.05). Push out bond strengths of Rebilda groups was lower than UniCore groups ( P < 0.05). Push out bond strength of DuoLink and Rebilda DC cement groups were higher than BisCem groups. There were no statistically differences between root region. Conclusion: It can be concluded that, bond strength between fiber post and root dentin affected by the using of different post and cement types. Self-adhesion techniques were showed lower bond strength than both self-etch and etch and rinse techniques
不同粘接工艺对两种纤维桩粘接强度的影响
目的:通过推出试验,研究三种不同的粘接技术对两种不同纤维桩与牙根质的粘接强度的影响。材料与方法:拔牙30颗,在牙髓-牙釉质结合处用水冷剂下的金刚石盘切片,获得根长18mm。所有的牙根都进行了牙髓治疗,并用封口剂和杜仲胶填充。根据所选的邮政系统,树根被随机分为两组(Rebilda DC [VOCO,库克斯海文,德国]或UniCore [Ultradent,南约旦])。预备标本随机分为3个亚组,每组3颗牙。用Rebilda DC(自蚀刻)完成了帖子的雕刻;BisCem(不干胶,Bisco, Schaumburg, IL) Duo-Link(蚀刻和冲洗Bisco)。将标本横切成2±0.05 mm厚的圆盘,进行推出试验。采用三向方差分析和Tukey检验对数据进行统计学分析。结果:纤维桩与根本质的结合强度受树脂胶结和桩型的影响(P < 0.05)。Rebilda组的推出键强度低于UniCore组(P < 0.05)。DuoLink和Rebilda DC水泥组的推出粘结强度高于BisCem组。不同根区间无统计学差异。结论:纤维桩与牙根本质的结合强度受不同桩和水泥类型的影响。自粘接技术的结合强度低于自蚀刻技术和蚀刻和冲洗技术
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信