{"title":"Rethinking the Affordable Care Act's \"Cadillac tax\": A More Equitable Way to Encourage \"Chevy\" Consumption.","authors":"S. Nowak, C. Eibner","doi":"10.15868/socialsector.25057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Affordable Care Act's \"Cadillac tax\" will apply a 40 percent excise tax on total employer health insurance premiums in excess of $10,200 for single coverage and $27,500 for family coverage, starting in 2018. Employer spending on premiums is currently excluded from income and payroll taxes. Economists argue that this encourages overconsumption of health care, favors high-income workers, and reduces federal revenue. This issue brief suggests that the Cadillac tax is a \"blunt instrument\" for addressing these concerns because it will affect workers on a rolling timetable, does relatively little to address the regressive nature of the current exclusion, and may penalize firms and workers for cost variation that is outside their control. Replacing the current exclusion with tax credits for employer coverage that scale inversely with income might allow for regional adjustments in health care costs and eliminate aspects of the tax exclusion that favor high-income over low-income workers.","PeriodicalId":85087,"journal":{"name":"LDI issue brief","volume":"71 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LDI issue brief","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15868/socialsector.25057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
The Affordable Care Act's "Cadillac tax" will apply a 40 percent excise tax on total employer health insurance premiums in excess of $10,200 for single coverage and $27,500 for family coverage, starting in 2018. Employer spending on premiums is currently excluded from income and payroll taxes. Economists argue that this encourages overconsumption of health care, favors high-income workers, and reduces federal revenue. This issue brief suggests that the Cadillac tax is a "blunt instrument" for addressing these concerns because it will affect workers on a rolling timetable, does relatively little to address the regressive nature of the current exclusion, and may penalize firms and workers for cost variation that is outside their control. Replacing the current exclusion with tax credits for employer coverage that scale inversely with income might allow for regional adjustments in health care costs and eliminate aspects of the tax exclusion that favor high-income over low-income workers.
《平价医疗法案》(Affordable Care Act)的“凯迪拉克税”(Cadillac tax)将从2018年开始,对个人医疗保险保费总额超过10200美元、家庭医疗保险保费总额超过27500美元的雇主医疗保险征收40%的消费税。目前,雇主在保费上的支出不包括在所得税和工资税中。经济学家认为,这鼓励了医疗保健的过度消费,有利于高收入工人,并减少了联邦收入。这个问题简要表明,凯迪拉克税是解决这些问题的“钝器”,因为它将影响到滚动时间表上的工人,相对而言,它对解决当前排除的累退性质几乎没有作用,并且可能会惩罚企业和工人,因为他们无法控制成本的变化。用与收入成反比的雇主保险的税收抵免取代目前的税收抵免,可能会允许医疗保健成本的区域调整,并消除税收抵免中有利于高收入工人而不是低收入工人的方面。