“I haven’t earned the right to just play around with my literacy programme”: strategies, tactics and policy actors/subjects

IF 0.8 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jane Tilson, Susan Sandretto
{"title":"“I haven’t earned the right to just play around with my literacy programme”: strategies, tactics and policy actors/subjects","authors":"Jane Tilson, Susan Sandretto","doi":"10.1108/etpc-11-2020-0152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this New Zealand study is to analyse the influence of the literacy course from an initial teacher education degree, to support beginning teachers to view themselves as policy actors, not mere policy subjects. In our role as teacher educators, we sought to support beginning teachers to find freedom within the constraints of official literacy policy to include multiliteracies.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nUsing de Certeau’s dialectic of strategies and tactics, the authors critically analysed the influence of the literacy course. The data included an assignment from the literacy course, an end-of-literacy course survey and a follow-up interview six months into their first teaching position with a group of five beginning primary school teachers.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings shed light on our apparent inability to support beginning teachers to see themselves as policy actors/subjects. The analysis reveals the beginning teachers’ tactical responses to our strategies intended to position them as policy actors. The analysis also illustrates how the tactics the authors deployed were viewed as strategies by the beginning teachers, ironically further solidifying the literacy policy they had sought to critique and destabilise and (re)positioning them as policy subjects.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nde Certeau’s framework supported the illumination of the complex interplay of strategies and tactics deployed by ourselves and beginning teachers as the authors sought to support them to identify the freedoms within the constraints of official literacy policy. Any future attempt to develop beginning teachers as policy actors/subjects will benefit from the careful examination of the strategies and tactics at play in initial teacher education.\n","PeriodicalId":45885,"journal":{"name":"English Teaching-Practice and Critique","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Teaching-Practice and Critique","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/etpc-11-2020-0152","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this New Zealand study is to analyse the influence of the literacy course from an initial teacher education degree, to support beginning teachers to view themselves as policy actors, not mere policy subjects. In our role as teacher educators, we sought to support beginning teachers to find freedom within the constraints of official literacy policy to include multiliteracies. Design/methodology/approach Using de Certeau’s dialectic of strategies and tactics, the authors critically analysed the influence of the literacy course. The data included an assignment from the literacy course, an end-of-literacy course survey and a follow-up interview six months into their first teaching position with a group of five beginning primary school teachers. Findings The findings shed light on our apparent inability to support beginning teachers to see themselves as policy actors/subjects. The analysis reveals the beginning teachers’ tactical responses to our strategies intended to position them as policy actors. The analysis also illustrates how the tactics the authors deployed were viewed as strategies by the beginning teachers, ironically further solidifying the literacy policy they had sought to critique and destabilise and (re)positioning them as policy subjects. Originality/value de Certeau’s framework supported the illumination of the complex interplay of strategies and tactics deployed by ourselves and beginning teachers as the authors sought to support them to identify the freedoms within the constraints of official literacy policy. Any future attempt to develop beginning teachers as policy actors/subjects will benefit from the careful examination of the strategies and tactics at play in initial teacher education.
“我还没有赢得玩弄我的扫盲计划的权利”:战略、战术和政策参与者/主题
这项新西兰研究的目的是从最初的教师教育程度来分析扫盲课程的影响,以支持初级教师将自己视为政策参与者,而不仅仅是政策主体。作为教师教育者,我们试图支持初任教师在官方扫盲政策的限制下找到自由,包括多种文字。运用德塞托的战略与战术辩证法,作者批判性地分析了扫盲课的影响。这些数据包括扫盲课程的作业、扫盲课程结束时的调查,以及他们在第一个教学岗位上六个月对五名小学初任教师的跟踪采访。这些发现揭示了我们在支持初学教师将自己视为政策参与者/主体方面的明显无能。分析揭示了初学教师对我们旨在将他们定位为政策参与者的策略的战术反应。分析还说明了作者所采用的策略是如何被初学教师视为策略的,具有讽刺意味的是,这进一步巩固了他们试图批评和动摇的扫盲政策,并(重新)将他们定位为政策主体。原创性/价值观Certeau的框架支持了我们和初学教师部署的战略和战术的复杂相互作用的阐释,因为作者试图支持他们在官方识字政策的约束下识别自由。未来任何将初任教师培养为政策参与者/主体的尝试,都将受益于对初任教师教育中发挥作用的策略和策略的仔细研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: English Teaching: Practice and Critique seeks to promote research and theory related to English literacy that is grounded in a range of contexts: classrooms, schools and wider educational constituencies. The journal has as its main focus English teaching in L1 settings. Submissions focused on EFL will be considered only if they have clear pertinence to English literacy in L1 settings. It provides a place where authors from a range of backgrounds can identify matters of common concern and thereby foster broad professional communities and networks. Where possible, English Teaching: Practice and Critique encourages comparative approaches to topics and issues. The journal published three types of manuscripts: research articles, essays (theoretical papers, reviews, and responses), and teacher narratives. Often special issues of the journal focus on distinct topics; however, unthemed manuscript submissions are always welcome and published in most issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信