Newton's numerator in 1685: A year of gestation

Q1 Arts and Humanities
George E. Smith
{"title":"Newton's numerator in 1685: A year of gestation","authors":"George E. Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In his “‘From the Phenomena of Motions to the Forces of Nature’: Hypothesis or Deduction?” of 1990 Howard Stein reinvigorated a centuries-old dispute over whether Newton had derived his law of gravity from phenomena. More specifically, Stein – like such notables before him as Euler – challenged whether any phenomenon involving gravity served as a basis for Newton inferring that his third law of motion applies to gravity, and with it for inferring that the mass of the attracting body belongs in the numerator of the law. Stein ends up conjecturing that Newton's conception of forces of nature as forces of interaction “was actually developed by Newton <strong><em>at the same time</em></strong> that he was discovering the law of gravitation.” This paper assesses this conjecture by examining the manuscripts – including deletions and insertions – that we have from 1685, the year during which the theory of gravity emerged and the <em>Principia</em> took shape. The conclusion is not merely that the manuscript evidence supports Stein's conjecture, but more significantly that the driving consideration behind both the Newtonian conception of forces of nature as forces of interaction and the inclusion of the mass of the attracting body in the numerator of the law was that the mass of the attracted body, as inferred from phenomena, must be included in the numerator – that is, the phenomena establishing that gravitational forces, unlike any other kind of forces, somehow “proportion themselves” to the individual bodies on which they act.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54442,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics","volume":"68 ","pages":"Pages 163-177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.08.003","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1355219818302041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In his “‘From the Phenomena of Motions to the Forces of Nature’: Hypothesis or Deduction?” of 1990 Howard Stein reinvigorated a centuries-old dispute over whether Newton had derived his law of gravity from phenomena. More specifically, Stein – like such notables before him as Euler – challenged whether any phenomenon involving gravity served as a basis for Newton inferring that his third law of motion applies to gravity, and with it for inferring that the mass of the attracting body belongs in the numerator of the law. Stein ends up conjecturing that Newton's conception of forces of nature as forces of interaction “was actually developed by Newton at the same time that he was discovering the law of gravitation.” This paper assesses this conjecture by examining the manuscripts – including deletions and insertions – that we have from 1685, the year during which the theory of gravity emerged and the Principia took shape. The conclusion is not merely that the manuscript evidence supports Stein's conjecture, but more significantly that the driving consideration behind both the Newtonian conception of forces of nature as forces of interaction and the inclusion of the mass of the attracting body in the numerator of the law was that the mass of the attracted body, as inferred from phenomena, must be included in the numerator – that is, the phenomena establishing that gravitational forces, unlike any other kind of forces, somehow “proportion themselves” to the individual bodies on which they act.

1685年牛顿分子:孕育的一年
在他的《从运动现象到自然力:假设还是演绎?》霍华德·斯坦(Howard Stein)在1990年发表的一篇文章中再次引发了一场持续了几个世纪的争论,即牛顿是否从现象中推导出了万有引力定律。更具体地说,斯坦因——就像在他之前的欧拉等名人一样——质疑是否有任何涉及引力的现象可以作为牛顿推断他的第三运动定律适用于引力的基础,并以此推断吸引物体的质量属于该定律的分子。斯坦因最后猜测,牛顿关于自然力的概念是相互作用的力,“实际上是牛顿在发现万有引力定律的同时发展起来的。”本文通过检查1685年以来的手稿(包括删除和插入的手稿)来评估这一猜想。1685年是引力理论出现和《原理》形成的一年。结论不仅仅是手稿证据支持斯坦的猜想,更重要的是,牛顿的自然力概念是相互作用的力,吸引物体的质量包含在定律的分子中,这背后的驱动考虑是,从现象中推断,被吸引物体的质量必须包含在分子中,也就是说,建立引力的现象,与任何其他种类的力不同,它以某种方式与它们所作用的单个物体“成比例”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics
Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 物理-科学史与科学哲学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics is devoted to all aspects of the history and philosophy of modern physics broadly understood, including physical aspects of astronomy, chemistry and other non-biological sciences. The primary focus is on physics from the mid/late-nineteenth century to the present, the period of emergence of the kind of theoretical physics that has come to dominate the exact sciences in the twentieth century. The journal is internationally oriented with contributions from a wide range of perspectives. In addition to purely historical or philosophical papers, the editors particularly encourage papers that combine these two disciplines. The editors are also keen to publish papers of interest to physicists, as well as specialists in history and philosophy of physics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信