Is Traditional Low-Dose Chemotherapy (Cytarabine/Melphalan) Still an Option for the Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes?

Annika M. Whittle, David T. Bowen
{"title":"Is Traditional Low-Dose Chemotherapy (Cytarabine/Melphalan) Still an Option for the Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes?","authors":"Annika M. Whittle,&nbsp;David T. Bowen","doi":"10.3816/CLK.2008.n.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the United Kingdom, low-dose cytarabine (Ara-C) is now considered the standard of care for nonintensive therapy of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with &gt; 10% blasts and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). It remains an inexpensive and effective therapy in older patients with AML or MDS who are not fit for intensive chemotherapy. Low-dose Ara-C is ineffective for adverse-risk karyotype, and the early death rate is high (9%). The incidence of grade 3/4 infection and hemorrhage is as high as 17% and 9%, respectively. A more favorable outcome is linked to the administration of ≥ 4 courses and to the achievement of complete remission (CR). The largest published series showed an overall response rate of 44% in 180 patients with refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB) and RAEB in transformation and a progression-free survival time of 9 months. Low-dose melphalan cannot be routinely recommended but should be considered in a subgroup of elderly patients with MDS with &gt; 10% blasts or AML, normal karyotype, and hypocellular bone marrow, where durable CR rates of 30% are reported with minimal side effects. Preliminary phase III trial data suggest that demethylating agents produce superior overall survival compared with other low-dose options.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100271,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Leukemia","volume":"2 3","pages":"Pages 187-192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3816/CLK.2008.n.023","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Leukemia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931692513600285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the United Kingdom, low-dose cytarabine (Ara-C) is now considered the standard of care for nonintensive therapy of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with > 10% blasts and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). It remains an inexpensive and effective therapy in older patients with AML or MDS who are not fit for intensive chemotherapy. Low-dose Ara-C is ineffective for adverse-risk karyotype, and the early death rate is high (9%). The incidence of grade 3/4 infection and hemorrhage is as high as 17% and 9%, respectively. A more favorable outcome is linked to the administration of ≥ 4 courses and to the achievement of complete remission (CR). The largest published series showed an overall response rate of 44% in 180 patients with refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB) and RAEB in transformation and a progression-free survival time of 9 months. Low-dose melphalan cannot be routinely recommended but should be considered in a subgroup of elderly patients with MDS with > 10% blasts or AML, normal karyotype, and hypocellular bone marrow, where durable CR rates of 30% are reported with minimal side effects. Preliminary phase III trial data suggest that demethylating agents produce superior overall survival compared with other low-dose options.

传统的低剂量化疗(阿糖胞苷/美法兰)仍然是治疗骨髓增生异常综合征的选择吗?
在英国,低剂量阿糖胞苷(Ara-C)目前被认为是骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)非强化治疗的标准治疗方案。10%原细胞和急性髓性白血病(AML)。对于不适合强化化疗的老年AML或MDS患者,它仍然是一种廉价而有效的治疗方法。低剂量Ara-C对不良风险核型无效,早期死亡率高(9%)。3/4级感染和出血的发生率分别高达17%和9%。更有利的结果与≥4个疗程的治疗和完全缓解(CR)的实现有关。已发表的最大系列研究显示,180例难治性贫血伴过多原细胞(RAEB)和RAEB转化患者的总有效率为44%,无进展生存期为9个月。低剂量美法兰不能常规推荐,但应考虑在老年MDS患者亚组中使用。10%原细胞或AML,正常核型和低细胞骨髓,其中持久CR率为30%,副作用最小。初步的III期试验数据表明,与其他低剂量药物相比,去甲基化药物可产生更高的总生存期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信