Phenotypic detection of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae using combined disk diffusion, ESBL HiCrome agar, and E-test: A comparative study

S. Dash, S. Sahu, B. Paty
{"title":"Phenotypic detection of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae using combined disk diffusion, ESBL HiCrome agar, and E-test: A comparative study","authors":"S. Dash, S. Sahu, B. Paty","doi":"10.4103/jdrntruhs.jdrntruhs_105_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) are in a rising trend in recent years, creating confusion for physicians to choose appropriate antimicrobials for treatment. Aim: The aim of the study is to detect ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae by using rapid detection tests such as combined disk diffusion, ESBL E-test strips (based on cefotaxime and cefotaxime+clavulanate), and ESBL HiCrome agar and compare the efficacy of these tests. Materials and Methods: Samples were processed using conventional methods. Bacterial antibiotic susceptibility testing was done on Mueller-Hinton agar according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. All Enterobacteriaceae isolates were subjected to ESBL HiCrome agar, combined disk diffusion, and E-test. Results: Out of 5299 samples, 2097 (39.57%) were culture-positive, and 200 (9.5%) Enterobacteriaceae isolates were obtained. The majority of the isolates were Escherichia coli (67.5%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (25%), Proteus mirabilis (3.5%), Proteus vulgaris (2%), and Citrobacter freundii (2%). 29.5% of all Enterobacteriaceae isolates were found to be ESBL producers by combined disk diffusion, ESBL HiCrome agar, and E-test methods, which showed 100% concordance. Conclusion: It is important to identify ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae from clinical samples for the judicious use of antibiotics. For early detection of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates, combined disk diffusion, ESBL HiCrome agar, and E tests were found to be equally effective in detecting ESBL production.","PeriodicalId":15571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences","volume":"207 1","pages":"200 - 207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jdrntruhs.jdrntruhs_105_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) are in a rising trend in recent years, creating confusion for physicians to choose appropriate antimicrobials for treatment. Aim: The aim of the study is to detect ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae by using rapid detection tests such as combined disk diffusion, ESBL E-test strips (based on cefotaxime and cefotaxime+clavulanate), and ESBL HiCrome agar and compare the efficacy of these tests. Materials and Methods: Samples were processed using conventional methods. Bacterial antibiotic susceptibility testing was done on Mueller-Hinton agar according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. All Enterobacteriaceae isolates were subjected to ESBL HiCrome agar, combined disk diffusion, and E-test. Results: Out of 5299 samples, 2097 (39.57%) were culture-positive, and 200 (9.5%) Enterobacteriaceae isolates were obtained. The majority of the isolates were Escherichia coli (67.5%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (25%), Proteus mirabilis (3.5%), Proteus vulgaris (2%), and Citrobacter freundii (2%). 29.5% of all Enterobacteriaceae isolates were found to be ESBL producers by combined disk diffusion, ESBL HiCrome agar, and E-test methods, which showed 100% concordance. Conclusion: It is important to identify ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae from clinical samples for the judicious use of antibiotics. For early detection of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates, combined disk diffusion, ESBL HiCrome agar, and E tests were found to be equally effective in detecting ESBL production.
利用圆盘扩散、ESBL琼脂和E-test联合检测产ESBL肠杆菌科的表型:比较研究
背景:近年来,广谱β -内酰胺酶(ESBLs)呈上升趋势,给医生选择合适的抗菌素治疗带来了困惑。目的:采用联合纸片扩散法、ESBL e试纸条(以头孢噻肟和头孢噻肟+克拉维酸盐为基础)、ESBL HiCrome琼脂快速检测方法检测产ESBL肠杆菌科细菌,并比较这些检测方法的效果。材料和方法:样品采用常规方法处理。根据临床和实验室标准协会的指导方针,对穆勒-辛顿琼脂进行细菌抗生素敏感性测试。所有分离的肠杆菌科菌株进行了ESBL - hrome琼脂、联合圆盘扩散和e检验。结果:5299份样本中培养阳性2097份(39.57%),分离出肠杆菌科200株(9.5%)。以大肠埃希菌(67.5%)最多,其次为肺炎克雷伯菌(25%)、奇异变形杆菌(3.5%)、寻常变形杆菌(2%)和弗伦地柠檬酸杆菌(2%)。采用圆盘扩散法、琼脂膜法和E-test联合检测,发现29.5%的enterobacteraceae菌株为ESBL产生菌,一致性为100%。结论:从临床样品中鉴定产esbl肠杆菌科对合理使用抗生素具有重要意义。对于产生ESBL的肠杆菌科分离物的早期检测,发现联合圆盘扩散、ESBL HiCrome琼脂和E试验在检测ESBL产生方面同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信