Critical Review of Plate Anchorage Stresses in Premature Debonding Failures of Plate Bonded Reinforced Concrete Beams

玻璃钢 Pub Date : 1999-08-01 DOI:10.14359/5637
P. Mukhopadhyaya, R. N. Swamy
{"title":"Critical Review of Plate Anchorage Stresses in Premature Debonding Failures of Plate Bonded Reinforced Concrete Beams","authors":"P. Mukhopadhyaya, R. N. Swamy","doi":"10.14359/5637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the major disadvantages of the plate bonding technology is the premature and brittle debonding failure of the bonded plate. It has been assumed, quite logically, that the stress concentration at the plate end is the primary cause of such premature plate debonding failure. However, there is no direct evidence of the validity of these stresses agree with the experimental data or not. Also there is concern if they can form the basis and criteria for the design and prevention of debonding failures. This paper presents a critical analysis of the calculated peak shear and normal stress values at the plate end using Roberts' approximate model, and derived from a wide range of published data involving steel, glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) and carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) plates. It is shown that these calculated stresses are far too high, and cover unacceptably wide range of values, without any consistent pattern of variation with the plate stiffness. It is clear that the peak stresses are influenced by other parameters which are not taken into account in the approximate model used in the calculations. The wide range of the peak stresses cannot form a reliable basis to explain or design the prevention of premature plate debonding failures.","PeriodicalId":68258,"journal":{"name":"玻璃钢","volume":"403 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"玻璃钢","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14359/5637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

One of the major disadvantages of the plate bonding technology is the premature and brittle debonding failure of the bonded plate. It has been assumed, quite logically, that the stress concentration at the plate end is the primary cause of such premature plate debonding failure. However, there is no direct evidence of the validity of these stresses agree with the experimental data or not. Also there is concern if they can form the basis and criteria for the design and prevention of debonding failures. This paper presents a critical analysis of the calculated peak shear and normal stress values at the plate end using Roberts' approximate model, and derived from a wide range of published data involving steel, glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) and carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) plates. It is shown that these calculated stresses are far too high, and cover unacceptably wide range of values, without any consistent pattern of variation with the plate stiffness. It is clear that the peak stresses are influenced by other parameters which are not taken into account in the approximate model used in the calculations. The wide range of the peak stresses cannot form a reliable basis to explain or design the prevention of premature plate debonding failures.
钢板粘结钢筋混凝土梁过早脱粘破坏中钢板锚固应力的评述
板粘接技术的主要缺点之一是粘接板的过早和脆性脱粘失效。很有逻辑地认为,板端应力集中是这种板过早脱粘破坏的主要原因。然而,没有直接的证据证明这些应力的有效性与实验数据是否一致。此外,它们是否可以作为设计和防止脱粘失效的基础和标准也值得关注。本文采用罗伯茨近似模型对计算出的板端峰值剪切和法向应力值进行了批判性分析,该模型来源于大量已发表的数据,涉及钢、玻璃纤维增强聚合物(GFRP)和碳纤维增强聚合物(CFRP)板。结果表明,这些计算出的应力太高了,并且覆盖了令人难以接受的大范围值,没有任何与板刚度一致的变化模式。很明显,峰值应力受到其他参数的影响,而这些参数在计算中使用的近似模型中没有考虑到。较大的峰值应力范围不能成为解释或设计防止板过早脱粘破坏的可靠依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
357
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信