Marginal bone loss associated with unilateral free end mandibular implant supporting superstructures constructed with different occlusal schemes

Sara Tamimi, M. Mandour
{"title":"Marginal bone loss associated with unilateral free end mandibular implant supporting superstructures constructed with different occlusal schemes","authors":"Sara Tamimi, M. Mandour","doi":"10.4103/tdj.tdj_71_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims This study was designed to evaluate the amount of bone resorption related to implant in free end saddle in response to different occlusal designs. Patients and methods Twenty patients with unilateral free end saddle in the lower arch till the second premolar were selected and received delayed single dental implants replacing the first molar tooth. They were divided into two main groups according to the implant superstructure deign (n = 10). Group 1: implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis which follow the principals of implant protected occlusion, and with the occlusal contact area of the crown smaller than the occlusal contact area of adjacent tooth. Group 2: implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis which follow the principals of implant protected occlusion, and with the occlusal contact area of the crown larger than the occlusal contact area of adjacent tooth. Patients were evaluated for the amount of marginal bone level at the time of crown insertion, after 3 and 6 months of function. Results There was a statistically significant change by time in marginal bone loss in both groups especially during the first 3 months. However, there was no statistically significant difference between marginal bone loss regarding the two groups. Conclusion It was concluded that increasing the occlusal contact area of the implant superstructure has no effect on marginal bone loss.","PeriodicalId":22324,"journal":{"name":"Tanta Dental Journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"84 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tanta Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tdj.tdj_71_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims This study was designed to evaluate the amount of bone resorption related to implant in free end saddle in response to different occlusal designs. Patients and methods Twenty patients with unilateral free end saddle in the lower arch till the second premolar were selected and received delayed single dental implants replacing the first molar tooth. They were divided into two main groups according to the implant superstructure deign (n = 10). Group 1: implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis which follow the principals of implant protected occlusion, and with the occlusal contact area of the crown smaller than the occlusal contact area of adjacent tooth. Group 2: implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis which follow the principals of implant protected occlusion, and with the occlusal contact area of the crown larger than the occlusal contact area of adjacent tooth. Patients were evaluated for the amount of marginal bone level at the time of crown insertion, after 3 and 6 months of function. Results There was a statistically significant change by time in marginal bone loss in both groups especially during the first 3 months. However, there was no statistically significant difference between marginal bone loss regarding the two groups. Conclusion It was concluded that increasing the occlusal contact area of the implant superstructure has no effect on marginal bone loss.
不同咬合方案下单侧游离端下颌种植体支撑上部结构的边缘骨丢失
目的本研究旨在评估不同牙合设计对游离端鞍座种植体骨吸收的影响。患者与方法选择20例下弓至第二前磨牙单侧游离端鞍位患者,采用延迟单牙种植体替代第一磨牙。根据种植体上部结构设计分为两组(n = 10)。第一组:种植支撑型固定义齿,遵循种植保护咬合原则,冠的咬合接触面积小于邻牙的咬合接触面积。第2组:采用种植体保护咬合原则,冠的咬合接触面积大于邻牙的咬合接触面积的种植体支持固定义齿。评估患者在冠植入时、功能恢复3个月和6个月后的边缘骨水平。结果两组患者的边缘骨质流失随时间的变化有统计学意义,尤其是在治疗前3个月。然而,两组的边缘骨质流失无统计学差异。结论增加种植体上部结构的咬合接触面积对边缘骨丢失无明显影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信