Indigenous Populations: Decision Making and Informed Consent to Research

P. Marshall
{"title":"Indigenous Populations: Decision Making and Informed Consent to Research","authors":"P. Marshall","doi":"10.1080/21507716.2012.740969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Taken together, Tupara’s (2012) article on decision making for health research in Aotearoa, New Zealand, and Sherman and colleagues’ (2012) case study from the Peruvian Amazon examining indigenous principles and ethical guidelines for informed consent, speak truth to the difficulties faced by investigators conducting research involving indigenous populations. Their detailed analyses of the ongoing and myriad challenges associated with informed consent to research with indigenous groups call attention to three interrelated issues: first, the history of colonization of indigenous people and its implications for health research in their communities; second, the application of western ideologies about informed consent in communities with different beliefs about the process of decision making; and third, the pragmatic constraints that researchers face in developing strategies to identify culturally appropriate models for implementing the process of informed consent. Application of the process of informed consent to research with indigenous people has received increased attention in the last decade. Challenges associated with informed consent such as lengthy forms and the use of scientific language that can be confusing are not unique to research involving indigenous populations. However, the legacy and negative effects of western colonization and its implications for implementing informed consent to health research with indigenous people is profound. Trust is an essential ingredient of the informed consent process in any cultural setting. Long histories of domination, subjugation, and discrimination by colonial powers diminish the potential for establishing trust with individuals or institutions representing “foreign” interests. In their arguments for the need to tailor informed consent to research, Rotimi and Marshall (2010) highlight issues associated with conducting research involving indigenous populations. Although Rotimi and Marshall’s (2010) paper focuses on international genetic and genomic research, the concerns they raise are applicable to health research generally. Both academic and industry investigators have been","PeriodicalId":89316,"journal":{"name":"AJOB primary research","volume":"50 1","pages":"69 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB primary research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507716.2012.740969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Taken together, Tupara’s (2012) article on decision making for health research in Aotearoa, New Zealand, and Sherman and colleagues’ (2012) case study from the Peruvian Amazon examining indigenous principles and ethical guidelines for informed consent, speak truth to the difficulties faced by investigators conducting research involving indigenous populations. Their detailed analyses of the ongoing and myriad challenges associated with informed consent to research with indigenous groups call attention to three interrelated issues: first, the history of colonization of indigenous people and its implications for health research in their communities; second, the application of western ideologies about informed consent in communities with different beliefs about the process of decision making; and third, the pragmatic constraints that researchers face in developing strategies to identify culturally appropriate models for implementing the process of informed consent. Application of the process of informed consent to research with indigenous people has received increased attention in the last decade. Challenges associated with informed consent such as lengthy forms and the use of scientific language that can be confusing are not unique to research involving indigenous populations. However, the legacy and negative effects of western colonization and its implications for implementing informed consent to health research with indigenous people is profound. Trust is an essential ingredient of the informed consent process in any cultural setting. Long histories of domination, subjugation, and discrimination by colonial powers diminish the potential for establishing trust with individuals or institutions representing “foreign” interests. In their arguments for the need to tailor informed consent to research, Rotimi and Marshall (2010) highlight issues associated with conducting research involving indigenous populations. Although Rotimi and Marshall’s (2010) paper focuses on international genetic and genomic research, the concerns they raise are applicable to health research generally. Both academic and industry investigators have been
土著居民:研究决策和知情同意
图帕拉(2012)关于新西兰奥特罗阿健康研究决策的文章,以及谢尔曼及其同事(2012)关于秘鲁亚马逊地区关于知情同意的土著原则和伦理准则的案例研究,都揭示了调查人员在开展涉及土著人口的研究时所面临的困难。他们详细分析了目前与知情同意对土著群体进行研究有关的无数挑战,提请人们注意三个相互关联的问题:第一,土著人民的殖民化历史及其对土著社区卫生研究的影响;第二,西方的知情同意意识形态在对决策过程有不同信仰的社区中的应用;第三,研究人员在制定策略以确定实施知情同意过程的文化适当模式时面临的实用限制。在过去十年中,将知情同意程序应用于与土著人民进行的研究受到了越来越多的关注。与知情同意相关的挑战,如冗长的表格和使用可能令人困惑的科学语言,并不是涉及土著人口的研究所独有的。然而,西方殖民的遗产和负面影响及其对土著人民开展健康研究知情同意的影响是深远的。信任是任何文化背景下知情同意过程的基本要素。殖民列强长期统治、征服和歧视的历史,削弱了与代表“外国”利益的个人或机构建立信任的潜力。Rotimi和Marshall(2010)在论证需要为研究量身定制知情同意时,强调了与开展涉及土著人口的研究相关的问题。虽然Rotimi和Marshall(2010)的论文侧重于国际遗传和基因组研究,但他们提出的问题一般适用于健康研究。学术界和产业界的调查人员都在研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信