For Your Library

{"title":"For Your Library","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/00274321231180217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mary Cohen and Stuart Duncan offer a fascinating book in Music-Making in U.S. Prisons: Listening to Incarcerated Voices. I was drawn in by book’s cover, with its bold and bright colors from the painting Jazz Band by artist Jason Chengrian. An overwhelming number of midtwentieth-century prison wardens and other officials in the United States were powerful proponents of music education programs within their facilities. For instance, at a strict reform school in Morganza, Pennsylvania, music supervisor Vetold Sporny taught choral music to prisoners under the age of twentyone. In the early 1940s, for the purpose of deciding what type of music educational opportunities could succeed in prison, Sporny asked for suggestions from various institutions across twentyfour states. Cohen and Duncan found it intriguing that Sporny prioritized vocal groups over instrumental ensembles. He also advocated for community singing as “one means for those in custody to gather as a community” (p. 50). The authors note that many of such music programs offered opportunities for prisoners to establish connections with the community, especially when they performed in public gatherings. The part of the research that most speaks to me is found in Cohen’s ins ight fu l in teract ions wi th the Oakdale Choir, called “The Insiders and Outsiders.” Using Stephen King’s memoir On Writing, Cohen developed a technique to enable choir members to create deeper and more open relations with fellow incarcerated people and their family members. He did this by using the writing prompts in King’s book for reflective writing exercises that were exchanged between the prisoners or used to introduce songs at rehearsals. I was also impressed by the program started by Duncan during his time as a teacher of an appreciation class at an adult correctional facility, where he used a unique form of assessment: He established a one-to-one grading contract with each incarcerated student, thereby empowering them through negotiation rather than conflict. This, he said, is a way to flip the power dynamic on its head. With Duncan’s approach, the students played a role in determining their grade points and took responsibility for their learning. The primary argument made by Cohen and Duncan throughout the book is that the rise of the prison industrial complex along with mass incarceration in the United States strips individuals in custodial care of their self-esteem. Current American prisons use numbers instead of names in reference to prisoners, and there are many cages inside most of these institutions, giving them the look of warehouses. Twenty-first-century prisons are a shift away from earlier ones, in which music-making was a regular practice. Early research shows how the applied music instruction of both Cohen and Duncan have been impactful on the lives of the incarcerated, although music doesn’t heal all the harms that this population suffers. I would give this book a rating of five out of five. Ideas are logically presented, and the authors’ views are backed by credible research. There is also an excellent introduction: The authors do not assume that all readers are music educators and that some may come from disciplines such as criminal justice and correctional systems, psychology, psychiatry, and even peace building. The theme of this book especially resonates with me because of my academic background in behavioral health. The book also encourages readers to consciously “de-label” individuals in custody by paying attention to the language we use. By adopting peoplecentered language, they help create awareness of the situation in which these individuals find themselves. The authors discourage the use of words like felons, inmates, or criminals when referring to the incarcerated. I would recommend this book first to family members who have loved ones who are incarcerated or in custody. Furthermore, I strongly recommend this book to arts instructors who desire to be agents of change. Last, I recommend it to anyone working for positive and transformative changes, such as researchers. The book is also recommended to formerly incarcerated individuals so that they may be equipped to create collaborative communities.","PeriodicalId":18823,"journal":{"name":"Music Educators Journal","volume":"5 1","pages":"10 - 12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Music Educators Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00274321231180217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mary Cohen and Stuart Duncan offer a fascinating book in Music-Making in U.S. Prisons: Listening to Incarcerated Voices. I was drawn in by book’s cover, with its bold and bright colors from the painting Jazz Band by artist Jason Chengrian. An overwhelming number of midtwentieth-century prison wardens and other officials in the United States were powerful proponents of music education programs within their facilities. For instance, at a strict reform school in Morganza, Pennsylvania, music supervisor Vetold Sporny taught choral music to prisoners under the age of twentyone. In the early 1940s, for the purpose of deciding what type of music educational opportunities could succeed in prison, Sporny asked for suggestions from various institutions across twentyfour states. Cohen and Duncan found it intriguing that Sporny prioritized vocal groups over instrumental ensembles. He also advocated for community singing as “one means for those in custody to gather as a community” (p. 50). The authors note that many of such music programs offered opportunities for prisoners to establish connections with the community, especially when they performed in public gatherings. The part of the research that most speaks to me is found in Cohen’s ins ight fu l in teract ions wi th the Oakdale Choir, called “The Insiders and Outsiders.” Using Stephen King’s memoir On Writing, Cohen developed a technique to enable choir members to create deeper and more open relations with fellow incarcerated people and their family members. He did this by using the writing prompts in King’s book for reflective writing exercises that were exchanged between the prisoners or used to introduce songs at rehearsals. I was also impressed by the program started by Duncan during his time as a teacher of an appreciation class at an adult correctional facility, where he used a unique form of assessment: He established a one-to-one grading contract with each incarcerated student, thereby empowering them through negotiation rather than conflict. This, he said, is a way to flip the power dynamic on its head. With Duncan’s approach, the students played a role in determining their grade points and took responsibility for their learning. The primary argument made by Cohen and Duncan throughout the book is that the rise of the prison industrial complex along with mass incarceration in the United States strips individuals in custodial care of their self-esteem. Current American prisons use numbers instead of names in reference to prisoners, and there are many cages inside most of these institutions, giving them the look of warehouses. Twenty-first-century prisons are a shift away from earlier ones, in which music-making was a regular practice. Early research shows how the applied music instruction of both Cohen and Duncan have been impactful on the lives of the incarcerated, although music doesn’t heal all the harms that this population suffers. I would give this book a rating of five out of five. Ideas are logically presented, and the authors’ views are backed by credible research. There is also an excellent introduction: The authors do not assume that all readers are music educators and that some may come from disciplines such as criminal justice and correctional systems, psychology, psychiatry, and even peace building. The theme of this book especially resonates with me because of my academic background in behavioral health. The book also encourages readers to consciously “de-label” individuals in custody by paying attention to the language we use. By adopting peoplecentered language, they help create awareness of the situation in which these individuals find themselves. The authors discourage the use of words like felons, inmates, or criminals when referring to the incarcerated. I would recommend this book first to family members who have loved ones who are incarcerated or in custody. Furthermore, I strongly recommend this book to arts instructors who desire to be agents of change. Last, I recommend it to anyone working for positive and transformative changes, such as researchers. The book is also recommended to formerly incarcerated individuals so that they may be equipped to create collaborative communities.
给你的图书馆
玛丽·科恩和斯图尔特·邓肯在《美国监狱中的音乐制作:倾听被监禁的声音》一书中提供了一本引人入胜的书。我被书的封面吸引住了,它大胆而明亮的色彩来自艺术家Jason Chengrian的画作《爵士乐队》。20世纪中期,美国监狱的监狱长和其他官员中,绝大多数都大力支持在监狱内开展音乐教育项目。例如,在宾夕法尼亚州摩根萨的一所严格的改造学校,音乐主管Vetold Sporny教21岁以下的囚犯合唱。在20世纪40年代早期,为了确定哪种类型的音乐教育机会可以在监狱中取得成功,斯波尼向24个州的不同机构征求了建议。科恩和邓肯发现,斯波尼优先考虑声乐组合而不是器乐合奏,这很有趣。他还提倡社区歌唱,作为“被拘留者作为一个社区聚集的一种手段”(第50页)。作者指出,许多这样的音乐节目为囚犯提供了与社区建立联系的机会,特别是当他们在公共集会上表演时。研究中最让我感兴趣的部分是科恩与奥克代尔合唱团的互动,名为“圈内人与圈外人”。科恩利用斯蒂芬·金的回忆录《写作》,开发了一种技术,使唱诗班成员能够与狱友及其家人建立更深入、更开放的关系。他通过使用金的书中的写作提示来进行反思性写作练习,这些练习在囚犯之间交换,或者用来在排练时介绍歌曲。我还对邓肯在一家成人惩教机构担任欣赏班老师期间启动的项目印象深刻,他在那里使用了一种独特的评估形式:他与每个在押学生建立了一对一的评分合同,从而使他们能够通过谈判而不是冲突来授权。他说,这是一种颠覆权力格局的方式。通过邓肯的方法,学生们在决定自己的成绩方面发挥了作用,并对自己的学习负责。科恩和邓肯在书中提出的主要论点是,美国监狱工业综合体的兴起以及大规模监禁剥夺了被监禁者的自尊。目前的美国监狱用数字而不是名字来称呼囚犯,而且大多数监狱里都有很多笼子,使它们看起来像仓库。21世纪的监狱与早期的监狱不同,在早期的监狱里,音乐制作是一种常规的做法。早期的研究表明,科恩和邓肯的应用音乐教学如何对被监禁者的生活产生影响,尽管音乐并不能治愈这一人群遭受的所有伤害。我给这本书打五分(满分五分)。观点是合乎逻辑的,作者的观点有可信的研究支持。还有一个很好的介绍:作者并没有假设所有的读者都是音乐教育家,有些人可能来自刑事司法和惩教系统、心理学、精神病学甚至和平建设等学科。这本书的主题特别能引起我的共鸣,因为我的学术背景是行为健康。这本书还鼓励读者通过注意我们使用的语言,有意识地“去标签”被拘留的人。通过采用以人为中心的语言,他们帮助人们意识到这些人所处的处境。作者不鼓励使用像重罪犯、囚犯或罪犯这样的词来指代被监禁的人。我首先会把这本书推荐给那些有亲人被监禁或拘留的家庭成员。此外,我强烈推荐这本书给那些渴望成为变革推动者的艺术教师。最后,我把它推荐给任何致力于积极和变革的人,比如研究人员。这本书也被推荐给以前被监禁的人,这样他们就可以建立合作社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信