SARS-Cov-2 Outbreaks in Sport and Exercise Settings: A Cross-sectional Study

Q4 Health Professions
A. Hernández-Aceituno, Laura García Hernández, Eva Rivas Wagner, E. A. Alvarez Leon, Eneko Larumbe Zabala
{"title":"SARS-Cov-2 Outbreaks in Sport and Exercise Settings: A Cross-sectional Study","authors":"A. Hernández-Aceituno, Laura García Hernández, Eva Rivas Wagner, E. A. Alvarez Leon, Eneko Larumbe Zabala","doi":"10.24018/ejsport.2022.1.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aimed to retrospectively explore the differences between COVID-19 outbreaks, based on their association with sport/exercise practice and whether expansion among confirmed cases was observed in these settings.\nMethod: Data from 5,327 COVID-19 outbreaks from the Epidemiological Surveillance Network of the Canary Islands were extracted between 31 January 2020 and 15 May 2021. We compared outbreaks in confirmed cases, close contacts, hospitalisations, admissions to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and deaths.\nResults: The median number of cases per outbreak in sport/exercise settings with transmission was significantly larger (9 [5–16]) compared with outbreaks in other settings (4 [3–7]). Similarly, age of first case (35 [25–44] vs. 42 [30–55] years) and number of close contacts (30 [10–62] vs. 10 [5–21]) presented significant differences. However, no differences were found in number of hospitalisations, admissions to ICU and deaths per outbreak.\nConclusions: Sport and exercise settings may pose a significant burden for contact tracing investigators since they tend to produce larger outbreaks. Regulations did not seem to completely control transmission. To enhance cooperation, specific recommendations and tailored advice are required according to the particular sport or exercise, the environment where it is practised and the available means of the facilities. Policies should encourage alternatives for safer sport/exercise practices.","PeriodicalId":36509,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine","volume":"481 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejsport.2022.1.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to retrospectively explore the differences between COVID-19 outbreaks, based on their association with sport/exercise practice and whether expansion among confirmed cases was observed in these settings. Method: Data from 5,327 COVID-19 outbreaks from the Epidemiological Surveillance Network of the Canary Islands were extracted between 31 January 2020 and 15 May 2021. We compared outbreaks in confirmed cases, close contacts, hospitalisations, admissions to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and deaths. Results: The median number of cases per outbreak in sport/exercise settings with transmission was significantly larger (9 [5–16]) compared with outbreaks in other settings (4 [3–7]). Similarly, age of first case (35 [25–44] vs. 42 [30–55] years) and number of close contacts (30 [10–62] vs. 10 [5–21]) presented significant differences. However, no differences were found in number of hospitalisations, admissions to ICU and deaths per outbreak. Conclusions: Sport and exercise settings may pose a significant burden for contact tracing investigators since they tend to produce larger outbreaks. Regulations did not seem to completely control transmission. To enhance cooperation, specific recommendations and tailored advice are required according to the particular sport or exercise, the environment where it is practised and the available means of the facilities. Policies should encourage alternatives for safer sport/exercise practices.
体育和运动环境中SARS-Cov-2暴发:一项横断面研究
目的:本研究旨在回顾性探讨COVID-19爆发之间的差异,基于它们与运动/锻炼的关联,以及在这些环境中是否观察到确诊病例的扩大。方法:提取2020年1月31日至2021年5月15日期间加那利群岛流行病学监测网络中5,327例COVID-19暴发的数据。我们比较了确诊病例、密切接触者、住院情况、入住重症监护病房(ICU)和死亡人数中的疫情。结果:与其他环境中的4例(3-7)相比,运动/运动环境中每次爆发的传播病例中位数明显较大(9例[5-16])。同样,首发病例年龄(35岁[25-44]vs. 42岁[30 - 55])和密切接触者人数(30岁[10 - 62]vs. 10岁[5-21])也存在显著差异。然而,在每次爆发的住院人数、ICU入院人数和死亡人数方面没有发现差异。结论:运动和运动环境可能给接触者追踪调查人员带来重大负担,因为它们往往会产生更大的疫情。法规似乎并没有完全控制病毒的传播。为了加强合作,需要根据具体的运动或运动、进行运动的环境和现有的设施,提出具体的建议和有针对性的意见。政策应该鼓励更安全的运动/锻炼方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine
Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine Business, Management and Accounting-Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信