Comparison of Three Small-Signal Stability Analysis Methods for Grid-Following Inverter

Liangwei Huang, Chao Wu, Dao Zhou, F. Blaabjerg
{"title":"Comparison of Three Small-Signal Stability Analysis Methods for Grid-Following Inverter","authors":"Liangwei Huang, Chao Wu, Dao Zhou, F. Blaabjerg","doi":"10.1109/OPTIM-ACEMP50812.2021.9590036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conventional vector current control (VCC) based grid-following inverters suffer from stability issues under weak grid, which attracts a lot of attention in recent years. Small-signal linearized model is an effective tool to analyze the stability of such nonlinear systems. In this paper, three small-signal stability analysis methods are compared, which are the state-space method, impedance analysis method, and equivalent single-input single-output (SISO) stability analysis method. These three methods are based on the same primitive system but with different input-output relations. Through strict analysis, it is found that the three methods basically predict the same stability boundary. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of three methods are summarized and compared.","PeriodicalId":32117,"journal":{"name":"Bioma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/OPTIM-ACEMP50812.2021.9590036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Conventional vector current control (VCC) based grid-following inverters suffer from stability issues under weak grid, which attracts a lot of attention in recent years. Small-signal linearized model is an effective tool to analyze the stability of such nonlinear systems. In this paper, three small-signal stability analysis methods are compared, which are the state-space method, impedance analysis method, and equivalent single-input single-output (SISO) stability analysis method. These three methods are based on the same primitive system but with different input-output relations. Through strict analysis, it is found that the three methods basically predict the same stability boundary. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of three methods are summarized and compared.
并网逆变器三种小信号稳定性分析方法的比较
传统的基于矢量电流控制(VCC)的随网逆变器在弱电网条件下存在稳定性问题,近年来备受关注。小信号线性化模型是分析此类非线性系统稳定性的有效工具。本文比较了三种小信号稳定性分析方法,即状态空间法、阻抗分析法和等效单输入单输出(SISO)稳定性分析法。这三种方法都是基于相同的原语系统,但具有不同的输入输出关系。通过严格的分析,发现三种方法预测的稳定边界基本一致。最后,对三种方法的优缺点进行了总结和比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
24 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信