Unifying genetic association tests via regression: Prospective and retrospective, parametric and nonparametric, and genotype- and allele-based tests

Pub Date : 2022-09-23 DOI:10.1002/cjs.11729
Lin Zhang, Lei Sun
{"title":"Unifying genetic association tests via regression: Prospective and retrospective, parametric and nonparametric, and genotype- and allele-based tests","authors":"Lin Zhang,&nbsp;Lei Sun","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Genetic association analysis, which evaluates relationships between genetic markers and complex, heritable traits, is the basis of genome-wide association studies. The many association tests that have been developed can generally be classified as prospective versus retrospective, parametric versus nonparametric, and genotype- versus allele-based. While method classifications are useful, it can be confusing and challenging for practitioners to decide on the “optimal” test to use for their data. We go beyond known differences between some popular association tests and provide new results that show analytical connections between tests, for both population- and family-based study designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cjs.11729","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjs.11729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Genetic association analysis, which evaluates relationships between genetic markers and complex, heritable traits, is the basis of genome-wide association studies. The many association tests that have been developed can generally be classified as prospective versus retrospective, parametric versus nonparametric, and genotype- versus allele-based. While method classifications are useful, it can be confusing and challenging for practitioners to decide on the “optimal” test to use for their data. We go beyond known differences between some popular association tests and provide new results that show analytical connections between tests, for both population- and family-based study designs.

Abstract Image

分享
查看原文
通过回归统一遗传关联测试:前瞻性和回顾性,参数化和非参数化,以及基于基因型和等位基因的测试
遗传关联分析评估遗传标记与复杂遗传性状之间的关系,是全基因组关联研究的基础。已开发的许多关联检测通常可分为前瞻性与回顾性、参数化与非参数化、基因型与等位基因型。虽然方法分类是有用的,但是对于从业者来说,决定为他们的数据使用“最佳”测试可能是令人困惑和具有挑战性的。我们超越了一些流行的关联测试之间已知的差异,并提供了新的结果,显示了基于人群和基于家庭的研究设计的测试之间的分析联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信