Altruism and the Transfer Paradox

Kojun Hamada
{"title":"Altruism and the Transfer Paradox","authors":"Kojun Hamada","doi":"10.5652/INTERNATIONALECONOMY.IE2012.08.K.H","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper examines whether altruism causes the transfer paradox in the model with two countries and two goods. Unlike the existing literature on the subject in which the people in the donor country maximize their own utility and do not care about the people in the recipient country, we analyze a situation in which the consumers of the donor and recipient countries have altruistic utility. We demonstrate that if the Walrasian stability condition is satisfied in the general equilibrium, the transfer paradox can never take place irrespective of the definition of utility. The result suggests that the motivation for transfer cannot be explained by the donor’s enrichment because it is not caused by the introduction of altruism into the model.","PeriodicalId":22492,"journal":{"name":"The International economy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5652/INTERNATIONALECONOMY.IE2012.08.K.H","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper examines whether altruism causes the transfer paradox in the model with two countries and two goods. Unlike the existing literature on the subject in which the people in the donor country maximize their own utility and do not care about the people in the recipient country, we analyze a situation in which the consumers of the donor and recipient countries have altruistic utility. We demonstrate that if the Walrasian stability condition is satisfied in the general equilibrium, the transfer paradox can never take place irrespective of the definition of utility. The result suggests that the motivation for transfer cannot be explained by the donor’s enrichment because it is not caused by the introduction of altruism into the model.
利他主义与转移悖论
本文考察了两国两品模型中是否存在利他主义导致的转移悖论。与现有文献中关于援助国人民最大化自己的效用而不关心受援国人民的问题不同,我们分析了援助国和受援国的消费者都具有利他效用的情况。我们证明了在一般均衡中,如果瓦尔拉斯稳定条件满足,无论效用的定义如何,转移悖论都不会发生。结果表明,转移的动机不能用捐赠者的富裕来解释,因为它不是由利他主义引入模型引起的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信